<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All Of McCain&#8217;s Investments Are In His Wife&#8217;s Name?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quote Of The Day</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-407142</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Quote Of The Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-407142</guid>
		<description>[...] out some of our other posts for and against releasing her tax returns: All Of McCainâ€™s Investments Are In His Wifeâ€™s Name? Do Cindy McCainâ€™s Tax Returns Matter? Cindy McCain Wonâ€™t Release Tax Returns   This entry was [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out some of our other posts for and against releasing her tax returns: All Of McCainâ€™s Investments Are In His Wifeâ€™s Name? Do Cindy McCainâ€™s Tax Returns Matter? Cindy McCain Wonâ€™t Release Tax Returns   This entry was [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whim</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406730</link>
		<dc:creator>whim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406730</guid>
		<description>I highly recommend reading this short blog post about this issue.

http://nitpicker.blogspot.com/2008/05/right-wing-magazines-attack-cindy.html?view=print

Be sure to read to the end -- it is hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly recommend reading this short blog post about this issue.</p>
<p><a href="http://nitpicker.blogspot.com/2008/05/right-wing-magazines-attack-cindy.html?view=print" rel="nofollow">http://nitpicker.blogspot.com/2008/05/right-wing-magazines-attack-cindy.html?view=print</a></p>
<p>Be sure to read to the end &#8212; it is hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406668</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 05:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406668</guid>
		<description>Alan,

I&#039;m not suggesting that Cindy has anything to hide. But for the McCains to claim that income after 28 years and 3 children is actually separate is stretching credibility. He&#039;s running for the POTUS after all, and it should be public record. Trust me, this will be standard operating procedure in the future.

And to add to that idea, shouldn&#039;t we be demanding more transparency from our candidates instead of less?

One last note, I think Theresa should have disclosed her income in 2004. It&#039;s only fair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting that Cindy has anything to hide. But for the McCains to claim that income after 28 years and 3 children is actually separate is stretching credibility. He&#8217;s running for the POTUS after all, and it should be public record. Trust me, this will be standard operating procedure in the future.</p>
<p>And to add to that idea, shouldn&#8217;t we be demanding more transparency from our candidates instead of less?</p>
<p>One last note, I think Theresa should have disclosed her income in 2004. It&#8217;s only fair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avinash_Tyagi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406666</link>
		<dc:creator>Avinash_Tyagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406666</guid>
		<description>@Alan:

Keating five; that&#039;s reason enough, the man has proven he isn&#039;t trustworthy, and since she holds his assets I want to see what he&#039;s wheeled and dealed over the years</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan:</p>
<p>Keating five; that&#8217;s reason enough, the man has proven he isn&#8217;t trustworthy, and since she holds his assets I want to see what he&#8217;s wheeled and dealed over the years</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nelson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406660</link>
		<dc:creator>Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406660</guid>
		<description>If they ever divorce, he&#039;s out of luck because all of those assets are in her name.

Journalists and bloggers want the data because it will give them fodder for a few (or many) stories. I doubt highly they&#039;re calling for this for altruistic reasons.

From the McCain family point of view: 
If nothing funny is going on, he gains nothing and his wife loses her privacy (which doesn&#039;t tend to make people happy, generally speaking). If something funny is going on, he loses a lot.

Therefore the sensible action is to not do it. Much like testifying in one&#039;s one criminal trial. If you&#039;re guilty you gain nothing, if you&#039;re innocent you lose privacy and digging deep enough, everyone has secrets they&#039;d rather not reveal (even legal ones).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they ever divorce, he&#8217;s out of luck because all of those assets are in her name.</p>
<p>Journalists and bloggers want the data because it will give them fodder for a few (or many) stories. I doubt highly they&#8217;re calling for this for altruistic reasons.</p>
<p>From the McCain family point of view:<br />
If nothing funny is going on, he gains nothing and his wife loses her privacy (which doesn&#8217;t tend to make people happy, generally speaking). If something funny is going on, he loses a lot.</p>
<p>Therefore the sensible action is to not do it. Much like testifying in one&#8217;s one criminal trial. If you&#8217;re guilty you gain nothing, if you&#8217;re innocent you lose privacy and digging deep enough, everyone has secrets they&#8217;d rather not reveal (even legal ones).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Stewart Carl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406640</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Stewart Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:10:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406640</guid>
		<description>Unless there is any real reason to expect financial wrongdoings on the part of the McCains, I don&#039;t see how forcing a woman to disclose personal income is a matter of public interest or furthers governmental &quot;transparency.&quot; Government transparency is about GOVERNMENT action, not private action. There has to be a line of privacy, even for spouses of presidential candidates.

I had no problem with Kerry&#039;s wife wanting to keep her finances private and I have no problem with Mrs. McCain&#039;s choice now.

Until someone has some credible reason to assume they&#039;re hiding something, I think calls for her to disclose her taxes is taking the idea of &quot;transparency&quot; further than it really needs to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless there is any real reason to expect financial wrongdoings on the part of the McCains, I don&#8217;t see how forcing a woman to disclose personal income is a matter of public interest or furthers governmental &#8220;transparency.&#8221; Government transparency is about GOVERNMENT action, not private action. There has to be a line of privacy, even for spouses of presidential candidates.</p>
<p>I had no problem with Kerry&#8217;s wife wanting to keep her finances private and I have no problem with Mrs. McCain&#8217;s choice now.</p>
<p>Until someone has some credible reason to assume they&#8217;re hiding something, I think calls for her to disclose her taxes is taking the idea of &#8220;transparency&#8221; further than it really needs to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406636</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406636</guid>
		<description>Haha, well actually, yes...this is the very definition of post-partisan because I&#039;m asking for the McCains to be open and transparent.

Good call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, well actually, yes&#8230;this is the very definition of post-partisan because I&#8217;m asking for the McCains to be open and transparent.</p>
<p>Good call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dos</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406633</link>
		<dc:creator>Dos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 23:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406633</guid>
		<description>Hey look everybody!! More of that post-partisan, unifying focus on the important issues coming from an Obamamite.  They truly do transcend don&#039;t they.  I&#039;m so look forward to the &quot;fixing&quot; of Washington by these good folks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey look everybody!! More of that post-partisan, unifying focus on the important issues coming from an Obamamite.  They truly do transcend don&#8217;t they.  I&#8217;m so look forward to the &#8220;fixing&#8221; of Washington by these good folks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becky</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406630</link>
		<dc:creator>Becky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406630</guid>
		<description>This really shouldn&#039;t be all that baffling--look at the source of Cindy McCain&#039;s money: http://girlinshortshorts.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-mccain-and-mob.html

~Becky</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really shouldn&#8217;t be all that baffling&#8211;look at the source of Cindy McCain&#8217;s money: <a href="http://girlinshortshorts.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-mccain-and-mob.html" rel="nofollow">http://girlinshortshorts.blogspot.com/2008/02/john-mccain-and-mob.html</a></p>
<p>~Becky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Gould</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/all-of-mccains-investments-are-in-his-wifes-name/comment-page-1/#comment-406626</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5576#comment-406626</guid>
		<description>Yowch.  I&#039;m against all of this tax disclosure in principle, but this looks an awful lot like deliberate obfuscation.  I&#039;m eager to see the &quot;straight talk&quot; on this one.  And to see what it is they considered sufficiently important to be worth hiding this way.

Plus the hint of a juicy story just off-stage might be enough to get the press to stop the whole ridiculous &quot;integrity&quot; line with McCain and actually, y&#039;know, investigate something more than what he tells them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yowch.  I&#8217;m against all of this tax disclosure in principle, but this looks an awful lot like deliberate obfuscation.  I&#8217;m eager to see the &#8220;straight talk&#8221; on this one.  And to see what it is they considered sufficiently important to be worth hiding this way.</p>
<p>Plus the hint of a juicy story just off-stage might be enough to get the press to stop the whole ridiculous &#8220;integrity&#8221; line with McCain and actually, y&#8217;know, investigate something more than what he tells them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
