<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did McCain Vote For Bush In 2000?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/did-mccain-vote-for-bush-in-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/did-mccain-vote-for-bush-in-2000/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pico</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/did-mccain-vote-for-bush-in-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-406680</link>
		<dc:creator>pico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5582#comment-406680</guid>
		<description>After the disgusting tactics Bush employed to beat McCain in the primaries, I don&#039;t see how anyone could blame McCain for not giving Bush his vote. I also don&#039;t see how this rumor will hurt McCain; Republicans won&#039;t believe it or WILL suspect it but will vote for him anyway, and Independents will hear it and gain a more favorable opinion of McCain since it only serves to make linking McCain with Bush&#039;s tenure more difficult.  

Avinash is right, McCain circa 2000 and McCain circa 2008 are two very different politicians, but polls seem to show he still has his image as a maverick intact despite his recent flip flopping and embracing the far right. I think it&#039;s safe to presume the average voter doesn&#039;t pay quite so much attention to these sorts of things as people who routinely check political blogs like us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the disgusting tactics Bush employed to beat McCain in the primaries, I don&#8217;t see how anyone could blame McCain for not giving Bush his vote. I also don&#8217;t see how this rumor will hurt McCain; Republicans won&#8217;t believe it or WILL suspect it but will vote for him anyway, and Independents will hear it and gain a more favorable opinion of McCain since it only serves to make linking McCain with Bush&#8217;s tenure more difficult.  </p>
<p>Avinash is right, McCain circa 2000 and McCain circa 2008 are two very different politicians, but polls seem to show he still has his image as a maverick intact despite his recent flip flopping and embracing the far right. I think it&#8217;s safe to presume the average voter doesn&#8217;t pay quite so much attention to these sorts of things as people who routinely check political blogs like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avinash_Tyagi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/09/did-mccain-vote-for-bush-in-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-406664</link>
		<dc:creator>Avinash_Tyagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5582#comment-406664</guid>
		<description>I disagree, we all know that McCain back in 2000 was a braver man then he is now, since then he&#039;s flip flopped on everything, and he was ticked off at Bush for all the smears he used on McCain.

Its very believable, if it wasn&#039;t people would dismiss it without even a second look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, we all know that McCain back in 2000 was a braver man then he is now, since then he&#8217;s flip flopped on everything, and he was ticked off at Bush for all the smears he used on McCain.</p>
<p>Its very believable, if it wasn&#8217;t people would dismiss it without even a second look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
