<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jim Webb For VP?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Democratic Ticket?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-409168</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Democratic Ticket?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-409168</guid>
		<description>[...] far as chatter goes, the talk around Webb as VP has cooled a bit since it was first raised, but since Obama essentially started his campaign in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] far as chatter goes, the talk around Webb as VP has cooled a bit since it was first raised, but since Obama essentially started his campaign in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kenny jb</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407828</link>
		<dc:creator>kenny jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407828</guid>
		<description>this is a great Idea. I love Jim Web. He bring balance and a real feeling of Change to the discussion.  
An Obama/ WEb ticket officially turns the page in the democratic party.  Bloggers and grass roots org. should 
really push this idea</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a great Idea. I love Jim Web. He bring balance and a real feeling of Change to the discussion.<br />
An Obama/ WEb ticket officially turns the page in the democratic party.  Bloggers and grass roots org. should<br />
really push this idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jim Webb Isn&#8217;t &#8220;That&#8221; Interested In VP</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407616</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Jim Webb Isn&#8217;t &#8220;That&#8221; Interested In VP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407616</guid>
		<description>[...] too long ago, I outlined the pluses and minuses of a Webb VP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] too long ago, I outlined the pluses and minuses of a Webb VP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maj Ernie Richardson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407212</link>
		<dc:creator>Maj Ernie Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 07:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407212</guid>
		<description>Fast Barry has too many PLO friends. Dems go up in the House. Dems go up in the Senate. McCain wins the Presidency. Not too hard to figure out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fast Barry has too many PLO friends. Dems go up in the House. Dems go up in the Senate. McCain wins the Presidency. Not too hard to figure out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ireneinmass</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407204</link>
		<dc:creator>ireneinmass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 05:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407204</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been enthusiastic about an Obama/Webb ticket for months. Even before the Wright and &quot;bitter&quot; eruptions, and even before HRC did all that weird shape shifting and kneecapping. In light of all that, I like the match even more. All the commenters here have listed the reasons the match up works so well. It&#039;s great balance and I think it would cancel out the appeal of McCain to conservative dems and independents. Although Obama is clearly (and thankfully)an even tempered thoughtful man who considers options and works towards consensus, qualities I think are good in a President, he is perceived as slow to act and his reserve comes across to many as flat or passionless. Hard to get that read from Webb who even when silent comes across as a coiled spring. I think Webb would bring a lot to the ticket, and I think he&#039;d like working with Obama&#039;s team, which is clearly a well oiled, incredibly tight and efficient organization. Richardson would be great at State. But Webb is underappreciated for his ideas on economics and a VP slot would allow him to address issues other than just military/veterans/national security.
I figure if I thought about it months ago, team Obama was on it a year before that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been enthusiastic about an Obama/Webb ticket for months. Even before the Wright and &#8220;bitter&#8221; eruptions, and even before HRC did all that weird shape shifting and kneecapping. In light of all that, I like the match even more. All the commenters here have listed the reasons the match up works so well. It&#8217;s great balance and I think it would cancel out the appeal of McCain to conservative dems and independents. Although Obama is clearly (and thankfully)an even tempered thoughtful man who considers options and works towards consensus, qualities I think are good in a President, he is perceived as slow to act and his reserve comes across to many as flat or passionless. Hard to get that read from Webb who even when silent comes across as a coiled spring. I think Webb would bring a lot to the ticket, and I think he&#8217;d like working with Obama&#8217;s team, which is clearly a well oiled, incredibly tight and efficient organization. Richardson would be great at State. But Webb is underappreciated for his ideas on economics and a VP slot would allow him to address issues other than just military/veterans/national security.<br />
I figure if I thought about it months ago, team Obama was on it a year before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Music Day</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407197</link>
		<dc:creator>Music Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 03:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407197</guid>
		<description>As a VERY liberal (to the left of Kucinich) Obama supporter let me just say I am voting for Obama no matter who he picks as VP. I want him to pick a VP that will help him win. If he has to pick a more conservative person to do that. Fine. Webb is an interesting choice. I just hope it&#039;s not Clinton. At this point she&#039;d be my least favorite pick. I just don&#039;t really trust her &amp; I think she brings way too much baggage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a VERY liberal (to the left of Kucinich) Obama supporter let me just say I am voting for Obama no matter who he picks as VP. I want him to pick a VP that will help him win. If he has to pick a more conservative person to do that. Fine. Webb is an interesting choice. I just hope it&#8217;s not Clinton. At this point she&#8217;d be my least favorite pick. I just don&#8217;t really trust her &amp; I think she brings way too much baggage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimBob</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407179</link>
		<dc:creator>JimBob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407179</guid>
		<description>So glad to see this piece.  I&#039;ve thought Webb would be a good pick for some time, esp. now that BHO seems firmly in control of the nomination.  McCain is such a lame candidate, I really can&#039;t get serious about &quot;We need this guy (or that guy or that girl) to beat McCain.  McCain is going to beat himself, so let&#039;s be thinking about who we really want for VP over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad to see this piece.  I&#8217;ve thought Webb would be a good pick for some time, esp. now that BHO seems firmly in control of the nomination.  McCain is such a lame candidate, I really can&#8217;t get serious about &#8220;We need this guy (or that guy or that girl) to beat McCain.  McCain is going to beat himself, so let&#8217;s be thinking about who we really want for VP over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max A</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407177</link>
		<dc:creator>Max A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407177</guid>
		<description>Webb and Richardson are the apparent top choices for Obama.  I like Webb, his politics are much closer to mine than Obama&#039;s are.  
 
We have a war on and Webb has the history to be able to criticize it without being called out of touch.  Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld: none of those dopes were ever shot at.  Webb wasn&#039;t just shot at, he was hit, and he kept fighting, and won.  Kinda hard to undersell that story to the heart land.

I actually have to say that I prefer Richardson.  Nicer.  Much better experience in diplomacy.  Hispanic.  &#039;Nuff said.

Edwards it too young.  Clinton would rather eat a live rat on national TV.  I think it&#039;ll be Richardson.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webb and Richardson are the apparent top choices for Obama.  I like Webb, his politics are much closer to mine than Obama&#8217;s are.  </p>
<p>We have a war on and Webb has the history to be able to criticize it without being called out of touch.  Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld: none of those dopes were ever shot at.  Webb wasn&#8217;t just shot at, he was hit, and he kept fighting, and won.  Kinda hard to undersell that story to the heart land.</p>
<p>I actually have to say that I prefer Richardson.  Nicer.  Much better experience in diplomacy.  Hispanic.  &#8216;Nuff said.</p>
<p>Edwards it too young.  Clinton would rather eat a live rat on national TV.  I think it&#8217;ll be Richardson.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pdx632</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407174</link>
		<dc:creator>Pdx632</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407174</guid>
		<description>Webb is one of the few VP candidates that could actually get me to vote for Obama. I think he is exactly the type of bulldog a more softspoken person like Obama needs. Let him chew on McCains butt for a couple of months and see how electable McCain is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webb is one of the few VP candidates that could actually get me to vote for Obama. I think he is exactly the type of bulldog a more softspoken person like Obama needs. Let him chew on McCains butt for a couple of months and see how electable McCain is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaigeinPhilly</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407170</link>
		<dc:creator>PaigeinPhilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 23:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407170</guid>
		<description>Webb would balance out the ticket...I wouldnt be surprised if he wasn&#039;t the pick all this time...the GI education bill....the book release?....

all is good.

Obama/Webb 08</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webb would balance out the ticket&#8230;I wouldnt be surprised if he wasn&#8217;t the pick all this time&#8230;the GI education bill&#8230;.the book release?&#8230;.</p>
<p>all is good.</p>
<p>Obama/Webb 08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eternal Optimish</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407154</link>
		<dc:creator>Eternal Optimish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407154</guid>
		<description>Webb is my personal pick, as well.  His military background and cold pragmatism (imho) would directly counter the &quot;Elitist&quot; label the right (+HRC) seems determined to pin on him.  This is also good for speaking to military families in middle America.  Webb has only seen a few opportunities to be seen nationally - the last being a response to a State of the Union (I believe) a few years back.  However, the response from the left, as well as the MSM (sadly important) have been very good.  Barack could really use someone on his team who could punch back directly at McBush&#039;s military record.  

Plus, delivering Virgina would be a nice housewarming gift.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webb is my personal pick, as well.  His military background and cold pragmatism (imho) would directly counter the &#8220;Elitist&#8221; label the right (+HRC) seems determined to pin on him.  This is also good for speaking to military families in middle America.  Webb has only seen a few opportunities to be seen nationally &#8211; the last being a response to a State of the Union (I believe) a few years back.  However, the response from the left, as well as the MSM (sadly important) have been very good.  Barack could really use someone on his team who could punch back directly at McBush&#8217;s military record.  </p>
<p>Plus, delivering Virgina would be a nice housewarming gift.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 21:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407146</guid>
		<description>Alan assumes that Obama&#039;s base is solidly liberal instead of the liberal/centrist mix I view it as. Of course there would be some people unhappy with Webb as VP but I doubt that they&#039;d be unhappy enough to change their vote or not show up to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan assumes that Obama&#8217;s base is solidly liberal instead of the liberal/centrist mix I view it as. Of course there would be some people unhappy with Webb as VP but I doubt that they&#8217;d be unhappy enough to change their vote or not show up to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Gould</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407141</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Gould</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407141</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;is Webb too conservative for Obamaâ€™s liberal base&lt;/i&gt;

In the general election, the ability to piss off the base a little bit is likely to be an advantage.  A lot of independents could be reassured by the base&#039;s discomfort, and it&#039;s independents that will be crucial to this election.

For the general election Obama is going to have to prove that &quot;change&quot; doesn&#039;t just mean &quot;hyper-leftism&quot;; a Webb pick could conceivably help with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>is Webb too conservative for Obamaâ€™s liberal base</i></p>
<p>In the general election, the ability to piss off the base a little bit is likely to be an advantage.  A lot of independents could be reassured by the base&#8217;s discomfort, and it&#8217;s independents that will be crucial to this election.</p>
<p>For the general election Obama is going to have to prove that &#8220;change&#8221; doesn&#8217;t just mean &#8220;hyper-leftism&#8221;; a Webb pick could conceivably help with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Stewart Carl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407136</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Stewart Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 20:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407136</guid>
		<description>I could see Webb being a very good attack dog for Obama. If the last two elections taught us anything, it&#039;s that a candidate can win without having an affable VP.

But is Webb too conservative for Obama&#039;s liberal base?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could see Webb being a very good attack dog for Obama. If the last two elections taught us anything, it&#8217;s that a candidate can win without having an affable VP.</p>
<p>But is Webb too conservative for Obama&#8217;s liberal base?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerryf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/05/14/jim-webb-for-vp/comment-page-1/#comment-407134</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5644#comment-407134</guid>
		<description>Why exactly does he have &quot;massive foreign policy credibility&quot;?

He has loads of experience in the military (marines, congressional staff person on matters relating to vets, secretary of navy), but that is not the same thing.

When we talk foreign policy expertise, I would prefer a person with experience in diplomacy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why exactly does he have &#8220;massive foreign policy credibility&#8221;?</p>
<p>He has loads of experience in the military (marines, congressional staff person on matters relating to vets, secretary of navy), but that is not the same thing.</p>
<p>When we talk foreign policy expertise, I would prefer a person with experience in diplomacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
