Candidates’ Signatures Analyzed
By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in 2008 ElectionIf you believe there’s any validity in handwriting analysis, this is interesting.
Graphologists analyzed the signatures of John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. What did they learn? McCain is proud and volatile. Obama is private and plays well with others. Clinton is intelligent and a perfectionist. I don’t know if it takes an analysis of handwriting to draw those conclusions, but it’s intriguing to think how we sign our names could say so much about who we are.
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 20th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.












May 20th, 2008 at 9:12 am
Slow news day, huh?
What rubbish; you should be ashamed for parading this pseudo-scientific, 19th-century tripe.
Whats next? An analysis of the lines in the hands of the candidates?
See: http://skepdic.com/graphol.html
…Speaking of pseudo-science, McCain’s support of Intelligent Design could be worthy of analysis, however.