A whole less drama and opportunities for overacting. But the same result for the nomination.

If I were Dean, I’d be really embarrassed at what a sloppy example of managing a party he was demonstrating. Anyone who supports the Democratic Party can only hope that Obama spares a moment to inject some new blood into the DNC as soon as the opportunity presents itself.

If she’d said she won more states that will actually be contested in November, it’d mean something. Her “legitimate case” is that she is more electable in crucial swing states. But at this point, the truth is that the intra-mural fighting has reduced the ability of either Clinton or Obama to win in November, so electability arguments in general are getting dumb.

The DNC really needs to consider reforming their primary process. It’s hurting them this round.

But she has a legitimate case when it comes to the question of who has truly shown his or her self to have greater appeal. Especially when it comes to the question of who would have more overall appeal in the general election, and even more especially when it comes top important battleground states.

Now personally, I tend to think the dems will come home to roost for Obama in November. But if Obama loses because he got creamed in FL, could not carry Ohio and barely got by in places like MI and PA, remember how you and many other Obama supporters routinely dismissed such concerns. I’ll be there to remind you Justin, so don’t worry. I hope Obama wins, and I prefer him to Hillary, but I am not so foolish as to suggest that there no reason for serious concern about Obama’s gen elec prospects. He has not exactly closed strongly, now has he? We can expect a widespread outbreak of handwringing and buyer’s remorse soon after Hillary officially bows out.