<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary Doesn&#8217;t Concede Tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/06/03/hillary-doesnt-concede-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/03/hillary-doesnt-concede-tonight/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:07:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pico</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/03/hillary-doesnt-concede-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-408941</link>
		<dc:creator>pico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=5890#comment-408941</guid>
		<description>I kind of liked her line: &quot;What does Hillary Clinton want?&quot; Usually such transparent and bloated egotism spoken in the third person is reserved for professional wrestlers trying to antagonize a crowd.

In any case...

Obama should call Hillary&#039;s bluff. If a large number of her supporters--say, 3-5 percent of the electorate--cast a write-in ballot for HRC and that turns out to be the difference in an Obama loss, she can kiss her 2012 prospects goodbye; in such an event, she would be blamed for not doing enough to rally her supporters to Obama and essentially become the new Ralph Nader to the majority of Democrats. There&#039;s no chance in hell that she&#039;d get close to the nomination after that. She wouldn&#039;t even be able keep her senate seat.

It&#039;s just a game of chicken at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of liked her line: &#8220;What does Hillary Clinton want?&#8221; Usually such transparent and bloated egotism spoken in the third person is reserved for professional wrestlers trying to antagonize a crowd.</p>
<p>In any case&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama should call Hillary&#8217;s bluff. If a large number of her supporters&#8211;say, 3-5 percent of the electorate&#8211;cast a write-in ballot for HRC and that turns out to be the difference in an Obama loss, she can kiss her 2012 prospects goodbye; in such an event, she would be blamed for not doing enough to rally her supporters to Obama and essentially become the new Ralph Nader to the majority of Democrats. There&#8217;s no chance in hell that she&#8217;d get close to the nomination after that. She wouldn&#8217;t even be able keep her senate seat.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a game of chicken at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
