<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Won&#8217;t Pay The AP One Red Cent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: dispundit</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/#comment-410025</link>
		<dc:creator>dispundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6040#comment-410025</guid>
		<description>the AP is so hypocritical.  Journalists and bloggers have had their stuff "excerpted" and lifted by AP reporters all the time.

I guess the AP feels that it is somehow special and the laws, and their own practices don't apply to them.

Shame Shame Shame</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the AP is so hypocritical.  Journalists and bloggers have had their stuff &#8220;excerpted&#8221; and lifted by AP reporters all the time.</p>
<p>I guess the AP feels that it is somehow special and the laws, and their own practices don&#8217;t apply to them.</p>
<p>Shame Shame Shame</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/#comment-409959</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6040#comment-409959</guid>
		<description>I agree with the spirit of your notion of completely ignoring the AP. However, the fact that you've bothered with this post will make that a difficult story to tell if they try to hassle you.

Nevertheless, I think you're on solid ground so long as you make can make a continually demonstrable good faith effort to follow a serious working definition of what constitutes fair use. That would mean keeping your verbatim excerpts to 2 or 3 paragraphs, even when 4 or 5 seems tasty.

It would also mean taking the time to write summaries and paraphrases in order to avoid breaking the bounds of fair use propriety. When you do this, the AP is immediately cast on far shakier ground.

Showing that you have a reasonable policy and that you follow it seriously is a very good defense. At the very least, it would encourage the AP to chase after someone they think they can bully with their new policy, which does NOT accord with established protocol. And make no mistake, that's how big orgs can operate, by using lawyers to bully bit players.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the spirit of your notion of completely ignoring the AP. However, the fact that you&#8217;ve bothered with this post will make that a difficult story to tell if they try to hassle you.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, I think you&#8217;re on solid ground so long as you make can make a continually demonstrable good faith effort to follow a serious working definition of what constitutes fair use. That would mean keeping your verbatim excerpts to 2 or 3 paragraphs, even when 4 or 5 seems tasty.</p>
<p>It would also mean taking the time to write summaries and paraphrases in order to avoid breaking the bounds of fair use propriety. When you do this, the AP is immediately cast on far shakier ground.</p>
<p>Showing that you have a reasonable policy and that you follow it seriously is a very good defense. At the very least, it would encourage the AP to chase after someone they think they can bully with their new policy, which does NOT accord with established protocol. And make no mistake, that&#8217;s how big orgs can operate, by using lawyers to bully bit players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Idiocy From The Associated Press</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/#comment-409954</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; More Idiocy From The Associated Press</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6040#comment-409954</guid>
		<description>[...] Gardner, for example, has joined the crowd of those who will not link to another Associated Press article if the present p... First, it’s a complete perversion of the fair use laws to suggest that quoting more than 4 words [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gardner, for example, has joined the crowd of those who will not link to another Associated Press article if the present p&#8230; First, it’s a complete perversion of the fair use laws to suggest that quoting more than 4 words [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Associated Press (AP) Versus The Blogosphere Proves Bloggers Are Winning The Battle For The Title Of &#8220;The Press&#8221; Our Founders Risked Their Lives To Protect &#124; THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/#comment-409941</link>
		<dc:creator>The Associated Press (AP) Versus The Blogosphere Proves Bloggers Are Winning The Battle For The Title Of &#8220;The Press&#8221; Our Founders Risked Their Lives To Protect &#124; THE GUN TOTING LIBERAL™</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6040#comment-409941</guid>
		<description>[...] Hot Air (Says it better than moi &#8212; and that&#8217;s sayin&#8217; somethin&#8217;); Donklephant; Little Green Footballs; Hot Air; Comments From Left Field; The Impolitic (Libby Spencer); The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hot Air (Says it better than moi &#8212; and that&#8217;s sayin&#8217; somethin&#8217;); Donklephant; Little Green Footballs; Hot Air; Comments From Left Field; The Impolitic (Libby Spencer); The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMiddle</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/#comment-409938</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6040#comment-409938</guid>
		<description>Ef the AP. This is complete BS. Good for you Justin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ef the AP. This is complete BS. Good for you Justin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S.W. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/06/17/why-i-wont-pay-the-ap-one-red-cent/#comment-409936</link>
		<dc:creator>S.W. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 03:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6040#comment-409936</guid>
		<description>The AP had better hope it doesn't prevail with this idiocy. Because, if it does prevail, in very short order some AP member news organization is going to quote from a blog, and the wire service is going to pick up and disseminate the story. Then, the blogger whose work was quoted is going to slap the AP with  a big, fat fee — and the threat of a lawsuit if the fee isn't paid.

Never mind having to defend the lawsuit. Having been hoist on its own petard, the AP is going to come off looking so pathetically lame its executives are going to wish they had never started this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AP had better hope it doesn&#8217;t prevail with this idiocy. Because, if it does prevail, in very short order some AP member news organization is going to quote from a blog, and the wire service is going to pick up and disseminate the story. Then, the blogger whose work was quoted is going to slap the AP with  a big, fat fee — and the threat of a lawsuit if the fee isn&#8217;t paid.</p>
<p>Never mind having to defend the lawsuit. Having been hoist on its own petard, the AP is going to come off looking so pathetically lame its executives are going to wish they had never started this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.353 seconds -->
