<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friedman On New Iraq Realities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/07/23/friedman-on-new-iraq-realities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/23/friedman-on-new-iraq-realities/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/23/friedman-on-new-iraq-realities/comment-page-1/#comment-412178</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6387#comment-412178</guid>
		<description>What course does McCain need to change, Justin?  He said we&#039;ll get out when the conditions are right; that position *has* to include the political will of the Iraqis, not just the security/military situation.  McCain&#039;s 2004 comments are very clear about this.  Does he need to &quot;adopt a timetable?&quot; Nope.  He simply needs to be 1000x more clear than Bush ever was on what will enable us to leave with confidence.  Maliki&#039;s express desire for the U.S. to go is one piece of that.  As others have pointed out, if conditions allow, I&#039;d love to see us draw down before the 16-month point.

We also need to be realistic about how Iraq will change once we&#039;re gone.  Like the former Soviet Union and China, the Iraqi people are not accustomed to democracy, and the change will not be pleasant for some.  In fact, I&#039;d put even odds on Iraq reverting to a strongman government before we see 2028....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What course does McCain need to change, Justin?  He said we&#8217;ll get out when the conditions are right; that position *has* to include the political will of the Iraqis, not just the security/military situation.  McCain&#8217;s 2004 comments are very clear about this.  Does he need to &#8220;adopt a timetable?&#8221; Nope.  He simply needs to be 1000x more clear than Bush ever was on what will enable us to leave with confidence.  Maliki&#8217;s express desire for the U.S. to go is one piece of that.  As others have pointed out, if conditions allow, I&#8217;d love to see us draw down before the 16-month point.</p>
<p>We also need to be realistic about how Iraq will change once we&#8217;re gone.  Like the former Soviet Union and China, the Iraqi people are not accustomed to democracy, and the change will not be pleasant for some.  In fact, I&#8217;d put even odds on Iraq reverting to a strongman government before we see 2028&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/23/friedman-on-new-iraq-realities/comment-page-1/#comment-412170</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6387#comment-412170</guid>
		<description>What surer sign that democracy has taken hold in Iraq than the proliferation of sanctimonious fist-pounding, promise-making politicians? That they happen to, in this case, be arguing about who is more strongly opposed to prolonging a substantial presence of US troops counts as a mere side effect, chock full of bitter irony though it may be.

Remember, installing a democracy in Iraq was our idea. Oopsie! Careful what you wish for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What surer sign that democracy has taken hold in Iraq than the proliferation of sanctimonious fist-pounding, promise-making politicians? That they happen to, in this case, be arguing about who is more strongly opposed to prolonging a substantial presence of US troops counts as a mere side effect, chock full of bitter irony though it may be.</p>
<p>Remember, installing a democracy in Iraq was our idea. Oopsie! Careful what you wish for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/23/friedman-on-new-iraq-realities/comment-page-1/#comment-412166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6387#comment-412166</guid>
		<description>Wait until the Kuwaitis and the Qataris get the memo, then we can expect riots in the streets of Doha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait until the Kuwaitis and the Qataris get the memo, then we can expect riots in the streets of Doha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

