<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Veep Picks Narrowed To 4?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/07/29/obamas-veep-picks-narrowed-to-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/29/obamas-veep-picks-narrowed-to-4/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tim in Wisconsin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/29/obamas-veep-picks-narrowed-to-4/#comment-412457</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim in Wisconsin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6496#comment-412457</guid>
		<description>"If fact, Bayh could swing Indiana, and that state hasn’t gone blue since 1996."

Check the color codes on your maps.  Blue wasn't standardized as a Democratic color until 2000.  A lot of sources from before then have the colors reversed.  The last time Indiana voted Democratic for president was 1964, and that was the only time since 1936.  (That's right, Indiana voted against Roosevelt twice.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If fact, Bayh could swing Indiana, and that state hasn’t gone blue since 1996.&#8221;</p>
<p>Check the color codes on your maps.  Blue wasn&#8217;t standardized as a Democratic color until 2000.  A lot of sources from before then have the colors reversed.  The last time Indiana voted Democratic for president was 1964, and that was the only time since 1936.  (That&#8217;s right, Indiana voted against Roosevelt twice.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubbles</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/29/obamas-veep-picks-narrowed-to-4/#comment-412445</link>
		<dc:creator>bubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6496#comment-412445</guid>
		<description>Biden would be the safest choice. He's not boring (well, if he keeps discussion short), he's fairly moderate and he's going to reassure the foreign-policy conscious that Democrats will be responsible on dealing with the rest of the world. Also, he's not like John Edwards and will be a fierce attack dog when necessary. Roman Catholic and popular in the Chesapeake Bay area as well as Pennsylvania, he could definitely pull in some electoral votes for Obama.


The Republicans are going to make it sound like Obama can't be trusted to keep America safe. That strategy won't be as strong as in 2004, but it still works in many places. Biden will be able to cancel that factor out a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Biden would be the safest choice. He&#8217;s not boring (well, if he keeps discussion short), he&#8217;s fairly moderate and he&#8217;s going to reassure the foreign-policy conscious that Democrats will be responsible on dealing with the rest of the world. Also, he&#8217;s not like John Edwards and will be a fierce attack dog when necessary. Roman Catholic and popular in the Chesapeake Bay area as well as Pennsylvania, he could definitely pull in some electoral votes for Obama.</p>
<p>The Republicans are going to make it sound like Obama can&#8217;t be trusted to keep America safe. That strategy won&#8217;t be as strong as in 2004, but it still works in many places. Biden will be able to cancel that factor out a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/29/obamas-veep-picks-narrowed-to-4/#comment-412411</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6496#comment-412411</guid>
		<description>If I'm going to pick from that line-up, Sebelius.  Kaine is my least favorite of the bunch of them.  I like Biden a lot, and in the role of presiding over the Senate, he'd be absolutely ideal.  But the VP does a lot more than that, and in almost every other area I'd prefer Sebelius or Bayh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m going to pick from that line-up, Sebelius.  Kaine is my least favorite of the bunch of them.  I like Biden a lot, and in the role of presiding over the Senate, he&#8217;d be absolutely ideal.  But the VP does a lot more than that, and in almost every other area I&#8217;d prefer Sebelius or Bayh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Obama Veepstakes</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/07/29/obamas-veep-picks-narrowed-to-4/#comment-412410</link>
		<dc:creator>Below The Beltway &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Obama Veepstakes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 16:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6496#comment-412410</guid>
		<description>[...] at Donklephant, Justin Gardner speculates that Obama&#8217;s best choice must just be someone we heard from 20 years ago: In any event, my advice would be to go with either Biden or Sebelius…and currently I’d lean [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Donklephant, Justin Gardner speculates that Obama&#8217;s best choice must just be someone we heard from 20 years ago: In any event, my advice would be to go with either Biden or Sebelius…and currently I’d lean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.328 seconds -->
