<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Army To Pay $150,000 For Arabic Speakers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/08/05/army-to-pay-150000-for-arabic-speakers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/05/army-to-pay-150000-for-arabic-speakers/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/05/army-to-pay-150000-for-arabic-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-412771</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6661#comment-412771</guid>
		<description>How is this &quot;buying our way out of the problem&quot; exactly?  You have an in-demand skill that few have....hmmm....low supply + high demand = high salary.  What occupation doesn&#039;t work that way?

Plus, I&#039;ve never once heard someone in the military complain about the difference in pay for special ops folks.  Individuals work their butts off trying to get into those units, and often wash out.  Not everyone is cut out for elite units and the troops accept it.  Same here...not everyone is going to be able to pick up a difficult to learn language like Arabic...although they are all welcome to try.  

I&#039;m sure the US was paying a premium for Russian speakers in 1947 too.  We adjusted and by the late 1980&#039;s we had too many to employ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this &#8220;buying our way out of the problem&#8221; exactly?  You have an in-demand skill that few have&#8230;.hmmm&#8230;.low supply + high demand = high salary.  What occupation doesn&#8217;t work that way?</p>
<p>Plus, I&#8217;ve never once heard someone in the military complain about the difference in pay for special ops folks.  Individuals work their butts off trying to get into those units, and often wash out.  Not everyone is cut out for elite units and the troops accept it.  Same here&#8230;not everyone is going to be able to pick up a difficult to learn language like Arabic&#8230;although they are all welcome to try.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure the US was paying a premium for Russian speakers in 1947 too.  We adjusted and by the late 1980&#8242;s we had too many to employ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/05/army-to-pay-150000-for-arabic-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-412727</link>
		<dc:creator>kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 01:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6661#comment-412727</guid>
		<description>I must have missed that pre-9/11 hue and cry from all those folks more far-sighted than the  Army, counseling a massive effort to train arabic speakers. Seriously folks, if the choice is between not having arabic speakers and paying market rate, there&#039;s not much to argue about, now is there?

The anti-gay policy is of course moronic. Though I suspect that with the retention bonuses as high as stated, we&#039;re talking about more than 58 openings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must have missed that pre-9/11 hue and cry from all those folks more far-sighted than the  Army, counseling a massive effort to train arabic speakers. Seriously folks, if the choice is between not having arabic speakers and paying market rate, there&#8217;s not much to argue about, now is there?</p>
<p>The anti-gay policy is of course moronic. Though I suspect that with the retention bonuses as high as stated, we&#8217;re talking about more than 58 openings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/05/army-to-pay-150000-for-arabic-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-412724</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 00:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6661#comment-412724</guid>
		<description>To expand on what Gold Star said, just consider it the price you pay to avoid having gays in the military.  Obviously the damage to morale from gays is greater than that from the vast differential for linguists.  Obviously -- even though the troops (as opposed to the generals) don&#039;t seem to think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To expand on what Gold Star said, just consider it the price you pay to avoid having gays in the military.  Obviously the damage to morale from gays is greater than that from the vast differential for linguists.  Obviously &#8212; even though the troops (as opposed to the generals) don&#8217;t seem to think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gold Star for Robot Boy</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/05/army-to-pay-150000-for-arabic-speakers/comment-page-1/#comment-412722</link>
		<dc:creator>Gold Star for Robot Boy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 23:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6661#comment-412722</guid>
		<description>Or, the Army could&#039;ve kept the 58 Arabic linguists who happen to be gay.
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/05/23/america/NA-GEN-US-Military-Gays.php
Nah. That&#039;s crazy talk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, the Army could&#8217;ve kept the 58 Arabic linguists who happen to be gay.<br />
<a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/05/23/america/NA-GEN-US-Military-Gays.php" >http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/05/23/america/NA-GEN-US-Military-Gays.php</a><br />
Nah. That&#8217;s crazy talk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

