<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill, Not Hillary, Greenlit Infamous &#8220;3 a.m. Ad&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/08/10/bill-not-hillary-greenlit-infamous-3-am-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/10/bill-not-hillary-greenlit-infamous-3-am-ad/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/10/bill-not-hillary-greenlit-infamous-3-am-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-413090</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6746#comment-413090</guid>
		<description>ROTFLMAO...

...and we know this is true HOW exactly? And we find out about this AFTER the nomination fight has ended purely as a matter of coincidence, right?

The spot was both 1. very effective(which was easily foreseeable)  and 2.very controversial. 

#1 assures me that Hillary was involved in the decision and comfortable with it. No one  with a brain is going to believe that Bill is the only one willing to play hard ball and that Hillary is Mary Poppins.

#2 assures me that, now that Hillary has lost in 2008 and wants to plump her rep for 2012, she&#039;s eager to get for Bill to be cast in the role of &quot;bad cop.&quot; In the time between now and when Hillary next runs, we&#039;ll find that the majority of the mean and iffy decisions will be laid at Bill&#039;s feet. Then, the next time Hillary runs, she&#039;ll run as her own woman making her own decisions. I would not even be surprised if Hillary is contemplating a divorce or separation as part of the next story line. Either way, Bill gets to take the hits to burnish Hillary&#039;s image. That&#039;s how it works. If Bill doesn&#039;t play ball, Hillary threatens to someday reveal details on the full extent of Bill&#039;s infidelities and peculiar appetites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROTFLMAO&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;and we know this is true HOW exactly? And we find out about this AFTER the nomination fight has ended purely as a matter of coincidence, right?</p>
<p>The spot was both 1. very effective(which was easily foreseeable)  and 2.very controversial. </p>
<p>#1 assures me that Hillary was involved in the decision and comfortable with it. No one  with a brain is going to believe that Bill is the only one willing to play hard ball and that Hillary is Mary Poppins.</p>
<p>#2 assures me that, now that Hillary has lost in 2008 and wants to plump her rep for 2012, she&#8217;s eager to get for Bill to be cast in the role of &#8220;bad cop.&#8221; In the time between now and when Hillary next runs, we&#8217;ll find that the majority of the mean and iffy decisions will be laid at Bill&#8217;s feet. Then, the next time Hillary runs, she&#8217;ll run as her own woman making her own decisions. I would not even be surprised if Hillary is contemplating a divorce or separation as part of the next story line. Either way, Bill gets to take the hits to burnish Hillary&#8217;s image. That&#8217;s how it works. If Bill doesn&#8217;t play ball, Hillary threatens to someday reveal details on the full extent of Bill&#8217;s infidelities and peculiar appetites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
