<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 67% Of American Corporations Pay No Taxes?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:41:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: McCain Loses Debate and Dignity; National Discourse Just Loses &#171; Digital.pHrett</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-417894</link>
		<dc:creator>McCain Loses Debate and Dignity; National Discourse Just Loses &#171; Digital.pHrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 07:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-417894</guid>
		<description>[...] As a sort of cover for this bit of intellectual dishonesty, the pride of Arizona continued by interweaving business tax numbers in a discussion of personal taxes (an excerpt of the transcript covering the entire tax issue can be found here). McCain&#8217;s new approach included mentioning that business taxes in Ireland are only 11% while business taxes in the United States are the highest in the world at 35%. Unfortunately, this cover for previous intellectual dishonesty is also intellectually dishonest4. What McCain has actually done is use a pre-deduction rate as though it is the rate actually being paid. To Obama&#8217;s credit, he called McCain out on this and made note that U.S. businesses don&#8217;t pay anything close to 35% income tax. In fact, two-thirds of all U.S. companies haven&#8217;t paid any income tax for the last seven years and possibly for as long as five years previous to that. (Sources here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here)5. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As a sort of cover for this bit of intellectual dishonesty, the pride of Arizona continued by interweaving business tax numbers in a discussion of personal taxes (an excerpt of the transcript covering the entire tax issue can be found here). McCain&#8217;s new approach included mentioning that business taxes in Ireland are only 11% while business taxes in the United States are the highest in the world at 35%. Unfortunately, this cover for previous intellectual dishonesty is also intellectually dishonest4. What McCain has actually done is use a pre-deduction rate as though it is the rate actually being paid. To Obama&#8217;s credit, he called McCain out on this and made note that U.S. businesses don&#8217;t pay anything close to 35% income tax. In fact, two-thirds of all U.S. companies haven&#8217;t paid any income tax for the last seven years and possibly for as long as five years previous to that. (Sources here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here)5. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Harden</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413327</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413327</guid>
		<description>gerryf - A good way to get audited is by grossly minimizing executive salaries in an s-corp.  If this were not the case, I&#039;d be making 20K a year and taking the rest in quarterly dividends.  The s-corp election is often a recognition that the shareholder is also an employee of the company.  His salary (employee wage) is differentiated from his investment income.  

One of the most stupid things Congress could do (even before raising the cap. gain rate) is to get rid of the s-corp.   The owner&#039;s SS benefits are commensurate with his contribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gerryf &#8211; A good way to get audited is by grossly minimizing executive salaries in an s-corp.  If this were not the case, I&#8217;d be making 20K a year and taking the rest in quarterly dividends.  The s-corp election is often a recognition that the shareholder is also an employee of the company.  His salary (employee wage) is differentiated from his investment income.  </p>
<p>One of the most stupid things Congress could do (even before raising the cap. gain rate) is to get rid of the s-corp.   The owner&#8217;s SS benefits are commensurate with his contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerryf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413293</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 03:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413293</guid>
		<description>Much of what has been said is true, however an s corporation DOES allow its &quot;shareholders&quot; to minimize FICA and self-employment taxes, so the overall tax liability is arguably lower and the revenue to the government is decreased.

So, an s-corporation shareholder and an employee making the same amount are taxed differently. Furthermore, if the s corporation shareholder then received the same amount in social security later, his benefit per contribution put into the system is greater.

Again, this is not as bad as paying nothing, but it is also not paying an equal share into the system (note, I said equal, not fair)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of what has been said is true, however an s corporation DOES allow its &#8220;shareholders&#8221; to minimize FICA and self-employment taxes, so the overall tax liability is arguably lower and the revenue to the government is decreased.</p>
<p>So, an s-corporation shareholder and an employee making the same amount are taxed differently. Furthermore, if the s corporation shareholder then received the same amount in social security later, his benefit per contribution put into the system is greater.</p>
<p>Again, this is not as bad as paying nothing, but it is also not paying an equal share into the system (note, I said equal, not fair)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShortWoman&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Taxman Doesn&#8217;t Cometh</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413287</link>
		<dc:creator>ShortWoman&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Taxman Doesn&#8217;t Cometh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 01:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413287</guid>
		<description>[...] lot has been made of the latest GAO study showing that more than 2 out of every 3 businesses in the United States pay no business Income Tax.Â  Heck, my kneejerk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lot has been made of the latest GAO study showing that more than 2 out of every 3 businesses in the United States pay no business Income Tax.Â  Heck, my kneejerk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Harden</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413284</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 00:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413284</guid>
		<description>You hit the nail on the head, wj.  This is a non-story generated by people with an agenda that have very little understanding of the tax code.  Now, Charles Rangle knows EXACTLY what he is doing when he declares a desire to eliminate the S-corp election: either make all business subject to the double-taxation of c-corps and/or make all income subject to payroll taxes. 

It is down-right funny for Justin to characterize an s-corp election as a &quot;loop-hole.&quot;  But whatever perpetuates class warfare...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You hit the nail on the head, wj.  This is a non-story generated by people with an agenda that have very little understanding of the tax code.  Now, Charles Rangle knows EXACTLY what he is doing when he declares a desire to eliminate the S-corp election: either make all business subject to the double-taxation of c-corps and/or make all income subject to payroll taxes. </p>
<p>It is down-right funny for Justin to characterize an s-corp election as a &#8220;loop-hole.&#8221;  But whatever perpetuates class warfare&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413277</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 23:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413277</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s certainly a great headline.  And if you limited yourself to C corporations (since S corps pay via individual income taxes), and then looked at which of those made a profit vs. a loss . . . well it just wouldn&#039;t be as impressive a number.  But the prupose of a story like this is to produce a great headline, not to impart facts -- and for that purpose, it&#039;s relly effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s certainly a great headline.  And if you limited yourself to C corporations (since S corps pay via individual income taxes), and then looked at which of those made a profit vs. a loss . . . well it just wouldn&#8217;t be as impressive a number.  But the prupose of a story like this is to produce a great headline, not to impart facts &#8212; and for that purpose, it&#8217;s relly effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Harden</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413275</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413275</guid>
		<description>Getting rid of the &quot;S&quot; Corp tax election is a direct tax slap-in-th-face to small business, not big corporations.  In fact, s-corps can have no more than 100 members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting rid of the &#8220;S&#8221; Corp tax election is a direct tax slap-in-th-face to small business, not big corporations.  In fact, s-corps can have no more than 100 members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atheist.nu &#187; The kinky bible and scummy American Corporations</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413266</link>
		<dc:creator>Atheist.nu &#187; The kinky bible and scummy American Corporations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413266</guid>
		<description>[...] Another thing that is known, is how huge America is in the Capitalist Global Economy. They dwarf any other country in the world. As well, it is known that there is lots of poverty in America. So, does it seem wrong to you that 67% of american corporations paid no taxes AT ALL from 1998 to 2005? Hell yes! That is fucked up!   [From Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 67% Of American Corporations Pay No Taxes?] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Another thing that is known, is how huge America is in the Capitalist Global Economy. They dwarf any other country in the world. As well, it is known that there is lots of poverty in America. So, does it seem wrong to you that 67% of american corporations paid no taxes AT ALL from 1998 to 2005? Hell yes! That is fucked up!   [From Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 67% Of American Corporations Pay No Taxes?] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LinuxTX</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413263</link>
		<dc:creator>LinuxTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 19:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413263</guid>
		<description>I do not agree that certain corporations should have any more tax breaks than other company. I also think our tax system is completely broken if we have enough loopholes to allow 67% of companies to not pay taxes.

Changing the tax system is the only way to fix this problem. By just fixing the loopholes, the companies will, in turn, increase prices (pass the cost of taxes down to the consumer). I happen to think that a Fair Tax at a state to state level would do well, but that&#039;s just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not agree that certain corporations should have any more tax breaks than other company. I also think our tax system is completely broken if we have enough loopholes to allow 67% of companies to not pay taxes.</p>
<p>Changing the tax system is the only way to fix this problem. By just fixing the loopholes, the companies will, in turn, increase prices (pass the cost of taxes down to the consumer). I happen to think that a Fair Tax at a state to state level would do well, but that&#8217;s just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413254</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413254</guid>
		<description>My basic assumption in such matters is that there is a wealth of complexity to the various systems that makes simple comparisons and statistics prone to mislead me into assuming something that is not quite the case. So I don&#039;t take the bait anymore.

I&#039;m no expert, not in taxes nor economics nor government regulations. But I&#039;ve been around long enough to be comfortable questioning whether such simple unexamined facts are proof of what one of you has described as &quot;blatant corporatism.&quot; It&#039;s awful easy to assume that corporations eagerly and maliciously and greedily direct the vast majority of wealth to insiders like top management and already wealthy investors, while joyfully and unscrupulously squeezing workers dry and casting them aside. 

I used to assume it myself. But now I think there WAY more to it than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My basic assumption in such matters is that there is a wealth of complexity to the various systems that makes simple comparisons and statistics prone to mislead me into assuming something that is not quite the case. So I don&#8217;t take the bait anymore.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m no expert, not in taxes nor economics nor government regulations. But I&#8217;ve been around long enough to be comfortable questioning whether such simple unexamined facts are proof of what one of you has described as &#8220;blatant corporatism.&#8221; It&#8217;s awful easy to assume that corporations eagerly and maliciously and greedily direct the vast majority of wealth to insiders like top management and already wealthy investors, while joyfully and unscrupulously squeezing workers dry and casting them aside. </p>
<p>I used to assume it myself. But now I think there WAY more to it than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Langford</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413251</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Langford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413251</guid>
		<description>Oh wow this poster doesn&#039;t get it (and the AP writer misrepresented things)

S Corps pay LOTS AND LOTS of taxes. However they pass the taxes through to their owners which pay them.

Disreguarded LLC&#039;s pay all their income just like a guy got it from selling a car or something. 

Its incredibly hard to save much in the way of losses in S corps. So when S-Corps *do* pay taxes, they pay more than a C-corp would after a long period of losses.

This number is ENTIRELY DECEPTIVE. While there are copious tax cheats out there, the real number is MUCH MUCH lower than 67%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow this poster doesn&#8217;t get it (and the AP writer misrepresented things)</p>
<p>S Corps pay LOTS AND LOTS of taxes. However they pass the taxes through to their owners which pay them.</p>
<p>Disreguarded LLC&#8217;s pay all their income just like a guy got it from selling a car or something. </p>
<p>Its incredibly hard to save much in the way of losses in S corps. So when S-Corps *do* pay taxes, they pay more than a C-corp would after a long period of losses.</p>
<p>This number is ENTIRELY DECEPTIVE. While there are copious tax cheats out there, the real number is MUCH MUCH lower than 67%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413248</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413248</guid>
		<description>This is what happens when idiots comment on the news. Who cares about their revenue. What were their *profits*? Companies are taxed on profits, not revenue. And a good many of those companies are, as the article mentions, S corp and LLCs, which means the companies pay no tax, because the profits are on the owners income tax, which is then taxed. So sure the company paid no tax, but tax was still paid as income tax for the owner.

Before more of you idiots want more taxes passed please understand how taxes work before you pass your righteous indignation. Who do you trust more with money - companies and small business owners, or the government? Think hard about this before answering :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what happens when idiots comment on the news. Who cares about their revenue. What were their *profits*? Companies are taxed on profits, not revenue. And a good many of those companies are, as the article mentions, S corp and LLCs, which means the companies pay no tax, because the profits are on the owners income tax, which is then taxed. So sure the company paid no tax, but tax was still paid as income tax for the owner.</p>
<p>Before more of you idiots want more taxes passed please understand how taxes work before you pass your righteous indignation. Who do you trust more with money &#8211; companies and small business owners, or the government? Think hard about this before answering :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413217</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413217</guid>
		<description>Ahem?  The &quot;type S&quot; corporation don&#039;t pay taxes because they have to transfer all of their profits to the owners -- who then pay taxes as income.  This is often done by high-end service type people (doctors, etc) in order to get the harder-to-sue benefits of a corporation without quite so many paperwork hassles.

Big companies that aren&#039;t making any money will also not pay taxes because (Tada!) taxes are generally paid on profits, not on gross revenue.  

Which is not to say that we shouldn&#039;t increase our corporate taxes.  Or, like Washington state, start taxing on gross revenue and not profit.  But *this* article doesn&#039;t provide enough details to know if outrage or pity is called for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahem?  The &#8220;type S&#8221; corporation don&#8217;t pay taxes because they have to transfer all of their profits to the owners &#8212; who then pay taxes as income.  This is often done by high-end service type people (doctors, etc) in order to get the harder-to-sue benefits of a corporation without quite so many paperwork hassles.</p>
<p>Big companies that aren&#8217;t making any money will also not pay taxes because (Tada!) taxes are generally paid on profits, not on gross revenue.  </p>
<p>Which is not to say that we shouldn&#8217;t increase our corporate taxes.  Or, like Washington state, start taxing on gross revenue and not profit.  But *this* article doesn&#8217;t provide enough details to know if outrage or pity is called for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ReneB</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413214</link>
		<dc:creator>ReneB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413214</guid>
		<description>see link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePete</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413211</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413211</guid>
		<description>Wow... good post, depressing news.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s quite as bad as you say, though.  Almost as bad, but not quite.  I mean, couldn&#039;t the CEOs all take salary cuts and stop getting their huge bonuses to save the companies buckets of bucks?  It may not stop them from failing to compete, but at least they&#039;d have tried.  How can they have their amazing homes, cars, and all that money while the companies that gave it to them go up in smoke?  Forget corporate responsibility, how about CEO responsibility!

Not that I don&#039;t completely agree with you about closing the loopholes.  Such blatant corporatism really needs to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; good post, depressing news.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s quite as bad as you say, though.  Almost as bad, but not quite.  I mean, couldn&#8217;t the CEOs all take salary cuts and stop getting their huge bonuses to save the companies buckets of bucks?  It may not stop them from failing to compete, but at least they&#8217;d have tried.  How can they have their amazing homes, cars, and all that money while the companies that gave it to them go up in smoke?  Forget corporate responsibility, how about CEO responsibility!</p>
<p>Not that I don&#8217;t completely agree with you about closing the loopholes.  Such blatant corporatism really needs to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/12/67-of-american-corporations-pay-no-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-413210</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=6798#comment-413210</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t feel too bad about the ability to compete--the same study showed that a similar % of foreign companies doing business in the US didn&#039;t pay income taxes either.  

And while I understand the argument that *some* of these companies might be paying taxes as individuals, this government-corporation backscratching has got to stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t feel too bad about the ability to compete&#8211;the same study showed that a similar % of foreign companies doing business in the US didn&#8217;t pay income taxes either.  </p>
<p>And while I understand the argument that *some* of these companies might be paying taxes as individuals, this government-corporation backscratching has got to stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
