<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s Gonna Be McCain/Palin `08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:53:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis Buell</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-2/#comment-415736</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Buell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-415736</guid>
		<description>This executive expirience argument is ridiculous. As mayor of Wasilla, AK, she was managing a budget that is smaller than the Ohio State University Student Senate budget. As governor, she inherited a budget surplus. HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO OUR ECONOMIC SITUATION??? And who cares if she fired &quot;that hack&quot;. Well, not only did she fire him, she also fired everyone in Wasilla who was against her, including the chief of police. Also, she asked the librarian as to how she could go about banning books. Abusing executive privelige and limiting free speech reminds me of a former leader. His name was Adolf Hitler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This executive expirience argument is ridiculous. As mayor of Wasilla, AK, she was managing a budget that is smaller than the Ohio State University Student Senate budget. As governor, she inherited a budget surplus. HOW DOES THIS RELATE TO OUR ECONOMIC SITUATION??? And who cares if she fired &#8220;that hack&#8221;. Well, not only did she fire him, she also fired everyone in Wasilla who was against her, including the chief of police. Also, she asked the librarian as to how she could go about banning books. Abusing executive privelige and limiting free speech reminds me of a former leader. His name was Adolf Hitler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joseph</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-2/#comment-414800</link>
		<dc:creator>Joseph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 16:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414800</guid>
		<description>Governor Palin has more executive experience than any candidate in the election, including Obama, Biden and McCain.  She is a great pick.  forget the ethics investigation, it&#039;s all smoke and mirrors, and even if she fired that hack for not doing just what she said, who cares?  It is her right to fire anyone who crosses her don&#039;t you think?  she&#039;s the boss!!!!  I don&#039;t want to see the Demos paint her as inexperienced, she did a great job in the PTA WHICH IS AN IMPORTENT ORGANIZATION TO THE YOUTH OF OUR COUNTRY.  she&#039;s got all it takes to run this country if Senator McCain happens to be too old and infirm to do his job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Governor Palin has more executive experience than any candidate in the election, including Obama, Biden and McCain.  She is a great pick.  forget the ethics investigation, it&#8217;s all smoke and mirrors, and even if she fired that hack for not doing just what she said, who cares?  It is her right to fire anyone who crosses her don&#8217;t you think?  she&#8217;s the boss!!!!  I don&#8217;t want to see the Demos paint her as inexperienced, she did a great job in the PTA WHICH IS AN IMPORTENT ORGANIZATION TO THE YOUTH OF OUR COUNTRY.  she&#8217;s got all it takes to run this country if Senator McCain happens to be too old and infirm to do his job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-2/#comment-414660</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414660</guid>
		<description>Too many doomsday scenarios for my liking.

steeeve, you are assuming a worst case scenario for McCain, as well as one for Obama, but which is more likely? I will say that McCain&#039;s is. Thus, you have inexperience vs. inexperience. Now, how inexperienced is Palin? That we will find out in the oncoming weeks. I doubt she as inexperienced as many would want to believe. Just like how you believe Obama isn&#039;t as inexperienced as many argue.

Regardless, my point still stands. For her position, VP, she can learn on the job. Stop treating her like she were running for president. Her role would only be to cast that deciding vote in the Senate (and to protect the space/time continuum).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too many doomsday scenarios for my liking.</p>
<p>steeeve, you are assuming a worst case scenario for McCain, as well as one for Obama, but which is more likely? I will say that McCain&#8217;s is. Thus, you have inexperience vs. inexperience. Now, how inexperienced is Palin? That we will find out in the oncoming weeks. I doubt she as inexperienced as many would want to believe. Just like how you believe Obama isn&#8217;t as inexperienced as many argue.</p>
<p>Regardless, my point still stands. For her position, VP, she can learn on the job. Stop treating her like she were running for president. Her role would only be to cast that deciding vote in the Senate (and to protect the space/time continuum).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-2/#comment-414626</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414626</guid>
		<description>Palin is still the VP candidate, not the Presidential Candidate.  Which would have been more absurd in &#039;88: Bush/Quale or Quale/Bush?   Its not a wash.  

If McCain survives 8 years, Palin would be ready.   Obama is not ready &lt;em&gt;now&lt;/em&gt; (at least according to what all the democrats said during the primary).  What is the greater risk?

Lets not forget, it is still Obama Vs. McCain.  We are all interested in the VP candidates now because they were just selected. After 2 more months of campaigning it is still going to come down to those 2, and the VPs will be an afterthought.  McCain therefore still has a valid &quot;experience&quot; argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin is still the VP candidate, not the Presidential Candidate.  Which would have been more absurd in &#8216;88: Bush/Quale or Quale/Bush?   Its not a wash.  </p>
<p>If McCain survives 8 years, Palin would be ready.   Obama is not ready <em>now</em> (at least according to what all the democrats said during the primary).  What is the greater risk?</p>
<p>Lets not forget, it is still Obama Vs. McCain.  We are all interested in the VP candidates now because they were just selected. After 2 more months of campaigning it is still going to come down to those 2, and the VPs will be an afterthought.  McCain therefore still has a valid &#8220;experience&#8221; argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-2/#comment-414621</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414621</guid>
		<description>@khaki
C&#039;mon. The investigation is obvious partisan fluff. Easily vetted, if there was anything there, they would not have picked her.

And a shout out to Steeve! To be the first at Donklephant in the post-Palin selection to invoke the favored argument of Obamites everywhere when the infallibility and inevitability of their guru is challenged: - The always compelling and winning argument &lt;i&gt;&quot;If you don&#039;t vote for Obama, you are stupid.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  

Correction. That is actually the number 2 Obamite argument. Number one of course being &lt;i&gt;&quot;If you don&#039;t vote for Obama, you are a racist.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  

Countdown till we see that next   3..2..1...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@khaki<br />
C&#8217;mon. The investigation is obvious partisan fluff. Easily vetted, if there was anything there, they would not have picked her.</p>
<p>And a shout out to Steeve! To be the first at Donklephant in the post-Palin selection to invoke the favored argument of Obamites everywhere when the infallibility and inevitability of their guru is challenged: &#8211; The always compelling and winning argument <i>&#8220;If you don&#8217;t vote for Obama, you are stupid.&#8221;</i>  </p>
<p>Correction. That is actually the number 2 Obamite argument. Number one of course being <i>&#8220;If you don&#8217;t vote for Obama, you are a racist.&#8221;</i>  </p>
<p>Countdown till we see that next   3..2..1&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-2/#comment-414618</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414618</guid>
		<description>Told you so.

Obama will continue to hit McCain hard on the experience MESSAGE since McCain has been hitting Obama so hard. 

Essentially, McCain has screwed himself when it comes to arguing he&#039;s the most experienced if he has somebody like Palin a heartbeat away.

And with Palin as his Veep, he&#039;s running on the Maverick message now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Told you so.</p>
<p>Obama will continue to hit McCain hard on the experience MESSAGE since McCain has been hitting Obama so hard. </p>
<p>Essentially, McCain has screwed himself when it comes to arguing he&#8217;s the most experienced if he has somebody like Palin a heartbeat away.</p>
<p>And with Palin as his Veep, he&#8217;s running on the Maverick message now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khaki</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414617</link>
		<dc:creator>khaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414617</guid>
		<description>Right.  The presidential campaign is &quot;executive experience&quot;.  Obama has been managing his campaign (and knocking it out of the park) for about as long as Palin has been governor.  

And, yes, $100K has been approved to investigate Palin for trying to get her former brother in law fired (bad) and then firing her subordinate when he refused (omg!).  If thereâ€™s any fire under this smoke, theyâ€™re in big trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  The presidential campaign is &#8220;executive experience&#8221;.  Obama has been managing his campaign (and knocking it out of the park) for about as long as Palin has been governor.  </p>
<p>And, yes, $100K has been approved to investigate Palin for trying to get her former brother in law fired (bad) and then firing her subordinate when he refused (omg!).  If thereâ€™s any fire under this smoke, theyâ€™re in big trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steeeve</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414616</link>
		<dc:creator>steeeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414616</guid>
		<description>&quot;Palin CAN afford to learn on the job since she will be the VP, not the President. McCain is not going to anticipate his own death, despite his age and skin-health concerns.&quot; - Andres

so wait a second... she can afford to learn on the job? so if McCain is elected and dies of old age or a heart attack 2 weeks in (which is a real possibility and i dont know why we dont hear more about that.. the guy already looks like hes being held up by strings.) then we can have a completely and utterly, in every sense of the word inexperienced president. And for some reason its all fine and dandy because shes a republican woman?

But if Obama (who isnt inexperienced, and im getting really sick of hearing it.. and who has shown better judgement than McCain CONSTANTLY) were to be assasinated or something (god forbid.. we need him), the VP is more than capable of running this country amazingly. And assuming he isnt assainated, well have the amazing judgement of Barack Obama and his intelligent, capable, and experienced VP there to help him find ways to get what needs to be done, done..




&quot;But conversely, he also just shredded the â€œBush IIIâ€ line of attack from the Dems. Itâ€™s clear the new focus is â€œthis is not your fatherâ€™s GOP.â€ For starters, the Palin pick clearly indicates weâ€™re not going to get another Cheney â€œfourth branchâ€ style vice presidency in a McCain administration, precisely because sheâ€™s so inexperienced (compare to Bush where Cheney clearly had all the insider knowledge).&quot; - crw

so basically the is the reverse of the last 8 years? instead of the president being nothing more than a &quot;good ol&#039; boy&quot; to win votes with idiots, and the vice president being the brains. this time the president is the brains (and not much of them...) and the VP is a &quot;cute girl&quot; from alaska to win votes with idiots and angry clinton supporters? Does the republican party have any new tactics?

oh and one last thing... if you were going to vote for Hillary and now youre voting McCain, then youre nothing more than an ignorant femminist, yes there are inequalities between men and women that really need to be fixed.. but you dont address them by voting for a woman JUST because she is a woman.. And if you support McCain now thats the only reason you would have voted for Hillary. Because Hillary stands for everything McCain doesnt stand for. if you actually voted on the issues you would know that and would support Obama. Voting for john McCain out of spite for Obama winning the candidacy is the stupidest thing ive ever heard of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Palin CAN afford to learn on the job since she will be the VP, not the President. McCain is not going to anticipate his own death, despite his age and skin-health concerns.&#8221; &#8211; Andres</p>
<p>so wait a second&#8230; she can afford to learn on the job? so if McCain is elected and dies of old age or a heart attack 2 weeks in (which is a real possibility and i dont know why we dont hear more about that.. the guy already looks like hes being held up by strings.) then we can have a completely and utterly, in every sense of the word inexperienced president. And for some reason its all fine and dandy because shes a republican woman?</p>
<p>But if Obama (who isnt inexperienced, and im getting really sick of hearing it.. and who has shown better judgement than McCain CONSTANTLY) were to be assasinated or something (god forbid.. we need him), the VP is more than capable of running this country amazingly. And assuming he isnt assainated, well have the amazing judgement of Barack Obama and his intelligent, capable, and experienced VP there to help him find ways to get what needs to be done, done..</p>
<p>&#8220;But conversely, he also just shredded the â€œBush IIIâ€ line of attack from the Dems. Itâ€™s clear the new focus is â€œthis is not your fatherâ€™s GOP.â€ For starters, the Palin pick clearly indicates weâ€™re not going to get another Cheney â€œfourth branchâ€ style vice presidency in a McCain administration, precisely because sheâ€™s so inexperienced (compare to Bush where Cheney clearly had all the insider knowledge).&#8221; &#8211; crw</p>
<p>so basically the is the reverse of the last 8 years? instead of the president being nothing more than a &#8220;good ol&#8217; boy&#8221; to win votes with idiots, and the vice president being the brains. this time the president is the brains (and not much of them&#8230;) and the VP is a &#8220;cute girl&#8221; from alaska to win votes with idiots and angry clinton supporters? Does the republican party have any new tactics?</p>
<p>oh and one last thing&#8230; if you were going to vote for Hillary and now youre voting McCain, then youre nothing more than an ignorant femminist, yes there are inequalities between men and women that really need to be fixed.. but you dont address them by voting for a woman JUST because she is a woman.. And if you support McCain now thats the only reason you would have voted for Hillary. Because Hillary stands for everything McCain doesnt stand for. if you actually voted on the issues you would know that and would support Obama. Voting for john McCain out of spite for Obama winning the candidacy is the stupidest thing ive ever heard of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414613</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414613</guid>
		<description>And she&#039;s already the subject of an ethics investigation back in Alaska.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And she&#8217;s already the subject of an ethics investigation back in Alaska.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414612</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414612</guid>
		<description>@khaki
I&#039;ll repeat - as long as you are comparing Palin&#039;s executive experience to Obama&#039;s executive experience, Obama loses the argument even if you conclude he has more experience. It is the fact that this comparison is even being argued that is deadly to Obama. 

That said, your point about being pressure tested in the primary is spot on.  Obama, McCain and Biden are all much better candidates for having gone through the wringer and scrutiny of a national campaign.  There is just no way to know how Palin is going to stand up under the pressure cooker. She is completely untested at this level of competition, and therein lies the risk.  Even she cannot have any idea about what she has gotten into.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@khaki<br />
I&#8217;ll repeat &#8211; as long as you are comparing Palin&#8217;s executive experience to Obama&#8217;s executive experience, Obama loses the argument even if you conclude he has more experience. It is the fact that this comparison is even being argued that is deadly to Obama. </p>
<p>That said, your point about being pressure tested in the primary is spot on.  Obama, McCain and Biden are all much better candidates for having gone through the wringer and scrutiny of a national campaign.  There is just no way to know how Palin is going to stand up under the pressure cooker. She is completely untested at this level of competition, and therein lies the risk.  Even she cannot have any idea about what she has gotten into.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khaki</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414611</link>
		<dc:creator>khaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414611</guid>
		<description>Maybe not by much, but a year and a half as governor of the 48th most populous state and a couple terms as mayor of a town of 9000 is a lot less experience than Obama&#039;s credentials.  Even if the only difference is that Obama was pressure tested by the intense primary; Palin was &quot;plucked&quot;.   I think the Obama camp&#039;s critisism will stick becuase he&#039;s mostly worked his way out of the &quot;inexperienced&quot; box.   We&#039;ll see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe not by much, but a year and a half as governor of the 48th most populous state and a couple terms as mayor of a town of 9000 is a lot less experience than Obama&#8217;s credentials.  Even if the only difference is that Obama was pressure tested by the intense primary; Palin was &#8220;plucked&#8221;.   I think the Obama camp&#8217;s critisism will stick becuase he&#8217;s mostly worked his way out of the &#8220;inexperienced&#8221; box.   We&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414601</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414601</guid>
		<description>Boy, was I wrong.  Here is the first official press release from the Obama camp on Palin:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Today, John McCain put the &lt;strong&gt;former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience&lt;/strong&gt; a heartbeat away from the presidency.  Governor Palin shares John McCain&#039;s commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush&#039;s failed economic policies -- that&#039;s not the change we need, it&#039;s just more of the same,&quot; said Bill Burton, Obama Campaign Spokesman.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Are they kicking themselves in the teeth here?  I expect McCain will just respond brutally everytime they mention inexperience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, was I wrong.  Here is the first official press release from the Obama camp on Palin:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Today, John McCain put the <strong>former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience</strong> a heartbeat away from the presidency.  Governor Palin shares John McCain&#8217;s commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil and continuing George Bush&#8217;s failed economic policies &#8212; that&#8217;s not the change we need, it&#8217;s just more of the same,&#8221; said Bill Burton, Obama Campaign Spokesman.</p></blockquote>
<p>Are they kicking themselves in the teeth here?  I expect McCain will just respond brutally everytime they mention inexperience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414600</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414600</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, what a power play by McCain. Trying to introduce disenfranchised Hillary voters to the red side is a bold move.

Well, here&#039;s something to read while you sift through the mindless commentary on CNN:

http://www.writingfrontier.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, what a power play by McCain. Trying to introduce disenfranchised Hillary voters to the red side is a bold move.</p>
<p>Well, here&#8217;s something to read while you sift through the mindless commentary on CNN:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.writingfrontier.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.writingfrontier.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414599</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414599</guid>
		<description>On the other hand, maybe McCain just wants to dip his fingers in her wells...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the other hand, maybe McCain just wants to dip his fingers in her wells&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414598</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414598</guid>
		<description>McCain spent the last 20 years gaining the respect of moderates and independentsâ€”but he may have just abandoned them, with this choice that clearly panders to the hard right, the Evangelicals, the theocratsâ€¦

Considering that McCain &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_primary#Manipulation_and_dilution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;arguably won the nomination on the backs of independent voters&lt;/a&gt;â€¦ this was not a very smart move.

Not only a heartbeat away from the presidency... but with the current SCOTUS lineup, also a heartbeat from an attempted overthrow of Roe v. Wade.

JimmiDhimmi:  How do you think the &quot;VILF&quot; factor will play for McCain, in the wake of ads with Britney and Paris?  Palin might get as much bandwidth on &quot;Perez&quot; as she will on &quot;Powerline.&quot;

Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com
http://www.uscentrist.org
http://marciaford.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain spent the last 20 years gaining the respect of moderates and independentsâ€”but he may have just abandoned them, with this choice that clearly panders to the hard right, the Evangelicals, the theocratsâ€¦</p>
<p>Considering that McCain <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_primary#Manipulation_and_dilution" rel="nofollow">arguably won the nomination on the backs of independent voters</a>â€¦ this was not a very smart move.</p>
<p>Not only a heartbeat away from the presidency&#8230; but with the current SCOTUS lineup, also a heartbeat from an attempted overthrow of Roe v. Wade.</p>
<p>JimmiDhimmi:  How do you think the &#8220;VILF&#8221; factor will play for McCain, in the wake of ads with Britney and Paris?  Palin might get as much bandwidth on &#8220;Perez&#8221; as she will on &#8220;Powerline.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agnostick<br />
<a href="mailto:agnostick@excite.com">agnostick@excite.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.uscentrist.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.uscentrist.org</a><br />
<a href="http://marciaford.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://marciaford.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khaki</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414596</link>
		<dc:creator>khaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414596</guid>
		<description>The 2008 formula: One inexperienced but progressive candidate on the ticket and one old white guy.  You could say the choice boils down to where America wants the progressive choice (top of the ticket or the bottom), and which progressive choice is more attractive (woman or black guy).   It reminds me of the conversations ealry in the Dem primary  - lots of folks could see Barrack as the VP, but not the other way around.  I think we were more comfortable with the experienced candidate on the top of the ticket.  If that setiment holds true, Obama is in for a real run for his money.  This is exciting stuff.  I&#039;m proud that this season a progressive choice was neccessary.  It means we&#039;re moving forward.  This is a good day for the U.S.  

(And when Obama wins it will be a great day for the U.S. - :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2008 formula: One inexperienced but progressive candidate on the ticket and one old white guy.  You could say the choice boils down to where America wants the progressive choice (top of the ticket or the bottom), and which progressive choice is more attractive (woman or black guy).   It reminds me of the conversations ealry in the Dem primary  &#8211; lots of folks could see Barrack as the VP, but not the other way around.  I think we were more comfortable with the experienced candidate on the top of the ticket.  If that setiment holds true, Obama is in for a real run for his money.  This is exciting stuff.  I&#8217;m proud that this season a progressive choice was neccessary.  It means we&#8217;re moving forward.  This is a good day for the U.S.  </p>
<p>(And when Obama wins it will be a great day for the U.S. &#8211; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414591</link>
		<dc:creator>crw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414591</guid>
		<description>Very smart pick, IMO.  McCain is sending a strong signal that the young fiscally disciplined reformers (Sarah Palin, Jeff Flake, Jeb Hensarling, etc) are the future of the GOP (because Palin has a very good chance of becoming heir apparent after a McCain administration).  Yes, he&#039;s badly undercut the inexperience and celebrity attacks they&#039;ve been using.  But conversely, he also just shredded the &quot;Bush III&quot; line of attack from the Dems.  It&#039;s clear the new focus is &quot;this is not your father&#039;s GOP.&quot;  For starters, the Palin pick clearly indicates we&#039;re not going to get another Cheney &quot;fourth branch&quot; style vice presidency in a McCain administration, precisely because she&#039;s so inexperienced (compare to Bush where Cheney clearly had all the insider knowledge).

Yes, it&#039;s a huge risk due to the &quot;heartbeat&quot; factor.  But really, given this is fundamentally a change election McCain had very little choice.  A Romney pick would have reinforced the &quot;Bush III&quot; meme.  Pawlenty would have been safe but done little for the long term health of the party.  Other picks would have sundered the base.  I think McCain wisely decided it&#039;s better to take a big risk but inject some vitality into a moribund and thoroughly corrupt party (leading to the possibility of another resurgence ala the post Goldwater revolution) than to play it safe and prop up the corpse for a little longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very smart pick, IMO.  McCain is sending a strong signal that the young fiscally disciplined reformers (Sarah Palin, Jeff Flake, Jeb Hensarling, etc) are the future of the GOP (because Palin has a very good chance of becoming heir apparent after a McCain administration).  Yes, he&#8217;s badly undercut the inexperience and celebrity attacks they&#8217;ve been using.  But conversely, he also just shredded the &#8220;Bush III&#8221; line of attack from the Dems.  It&#8217;s clear the new focus is &#8220;this is not your father&#8217;s GOP.&#8221;  For starters, the Palin pick clearly indicates we&#8217;re not going to get another Cheney &#8220;fourth branch&#8221; style vice presidency in a McCain administration, precisely because she&#8217;s so inexperienced (compare to Bush where Cheney clearly had all the insider knowledge).</p>
<p>Yes, it&#8217;s a huge risk due to the &#8220;heartbeat&#8221; factor.  But really, given this is fundamentally a change election McCain had very little choice.  A Romney pick would have reinforced the &#8220;Bush III&#8221; meme.  Pawlenty would have been safe but done little for the long term health of the party.  Other picks would have sundered the base.  I think McCain wisely decided it&#8217;s better to take a big risk but inject some vitality into a moribund and thoroughly corrupt party (leading to the possibility of another resurgence ala the post Goldwater revolution) than to play it safe and prop up the corpse for a little longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414590</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414590</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;... since McCain is running on the idea that he is experienced, not having a seasoned pick who could step in at a moments notice sort of undercuts the entire theme of his campaign, doesnâ€™t it?&quot;&lt;/i&gt; - JG &lt;/blockquote&gt;

This argument cuts both ways and is a net wash. It can be flipped on its head by partisans of both camps and if you are watching the pundits, you can see that is exactly what is happening. For example lets flip your argument:

&quot;... since Obama is running on the idea that the country needs judgment not experience, attacking Palin for lack of experience sort of undercuts the entire theme of his campaign, doesnâ€™t it?&quot;

Except for the fact that if the argument boils down to who has more executive experience Obama vs. Palin, McCain benefits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>&#8220;&#8230; since McCain is running on the idea that he is experienced, not having a seasoned pick who could step in at a moments notice sort of undercuts the entire theme of his campaign, doesnâ€™t it?&#8221;</i> &#8211; JG </p></blockquote>
<p>This argument cuts both ways and is a net wash. It can be flipped on its head by partisans of both camps and if you are watching the pundits, you can see that is exactly what is happening. For example lets flip your argument:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; since Obama is running on the idea that the country needs judgment not experience, attacking Palin for lack of experience sort of undercuts the entire theme of his campaign, doesnâ€™t it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Except for the fact that if the argument boils down to who has more executive experience Obama vs. Palin, McCain benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andres</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414583</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414583</guid>
		<description>Palin&#039;s inexperience will not be an issue because any attack on that is an easy counter against Obama.

Palin CAN afford to learn on the job since she will be the VP, not the President. McCain is not going to anticipate his own death, despite his age and skin-health concerns.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin&#8217;s inexperience will not be an issue because any attack on that is an easy counter against Obama.</p>
<p>Palin CAN afford to learn on the job since she will be the VP, not the President. McCain is not going to anticipate his own death, despite his age and skin-health concerns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Gardner</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/08/29/its-gonna-be-mccainpalin-08/comment-page-1/#comment-414582</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Gardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=7338#comment-414582</guid>
		<description>@mw - Calling somebody cute is sexist? Hmmm...

@Jimmy - 
&lt;blockquote&gt;The only knock on Sarah Palin is that she is too inexperienced. Do you think the Democrats will dare to bring that up?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Heh, well, since she has a grand total of 1.5 years of governing experience and since McCain is running on the idea that he is experienced, not having a seasoned pick who could step in at a moments notice sort of undercuts the entire theme of his campaign, doesn&#039;t it?

I&#039;m not saying the Biden didn&#039;t undercut Obama&#039;s change message, but you have to concede that it was better for Obama to fill in his gaps with somebody experienced like Biden than it was for McCain to pick somebody younger than Obama with even less experience than Obama to fill in a gap I don&#039;t think he even had.

One thing is for sure. This campaign just got A LOT more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mw &#8211; Calling somebody cute is sexist? Hmmm&#8230;</p>
<p>@Jimmy &#8211; </p>
<blockquote><p>The only knock on Sarah Palin is that she is too inexperienced. Do you think the Democrats will dare to bring that up?</p></blockquote>
<p>Heh, well, since she has a grand total of 1.5 years of governing experience and since McCain is running on the idea that he is experienced, not having a seasoned pick who could step in at a moments notice sort of undercuts the entire theme of his campaign, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying the Biden didn&#8217;t undercut Obama&#8217;s change message, but you have to concede that it was better for Obama to fill in his gaps with somebody experienced like Biden than it was for McCain to pick somebody younger than Obama with even less experience than Obama to fill in a gap I don&#8217;t think he even had.</p>
<p>One thing is for sure. This campaign just got A LOT more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
