Looking at Obama’s Speech

By Alan Stewart Carl | Related entries in Barack, DNC

John McCain’s surprise selection of Sarah Palin did its work. The coverage of Palin knocked Barack Obama’s convention speech right out of the news cycle. That’s a shame because 38 million people watched Obama’s speech — an event that big (more people watched Obama than watched the Olympic opening ceremonies this year) deserves more than a passing mention.

I thought the speech was excellent. I don’t agree with Obama’s reliance on the federal government to solve all our problems and, despite his supporters’ efforts to make his lack of experience a non-issue, I still worry that he’s too green for the job. But I thought he finally delivered a speech that didn’t wantonly substitute soaring rhetoric for common, specific language. He talked like he was involved in a conversation and not like he was in a pulpit. He’ll have to keep that up if he wants to win over new supporters rather than just exciting his current ones.

Content-wise, I liked that he made specific reference, more than once, to American exceptionalism. Now, a lot of liberals get ill at the thought that America might in fact have values and culture superior to other values and cultures (the world is simpler if you never have to make judgments). But Obama said this:

[I]t is that American spirit, that American promise, that pushes us forward even when the path is uncertain; that binds us together in spite of our differences; that makes us fix our eye not on what is seen, but what is unseen, that better place around the bend.

That promise is our greatest inheritance.

That may not mean anything specifically, but it tells me Obama thinks we, as a nation, have unique and powerfully positive qualities. Not every liberal believes that anymore.

I also liked that he didn’t shy away from talking about the very real threats we face. Not only did he specifically reference 9/11, he committed to continuing the fight against terrorism and even turned the security issue against John McCain by noting the Arizona senator’s tepid reactions to the growing dangers in Afghanistan. Then, Obama gave this doozy of a line.

You know, John McCain likes to say that he’ll follow bin Laden to the gates of Hell, but he won’t even follow him to the cave where he lives.

Unfair, sure. But a good line. He followed that up by evoking the legacies of FDR and JFK and chastising anyone who says Democrats won’t defend this nation. We’ve come a long way from John Kerry just assuming we’d trust him on security issues, haven’t we? I still have my doubts about Obama’s judgment on military issues (he really doesn’t think the surge had a positive effect?!?) but I’m glad to hear him facing the issue head-on.

Finally, if there is such a thing as “red meat” to throw to centrists, he threw me some good stuff when he said:

What has also been lost is our sense of common purpose, and that’s what we have to restore.

We may not agree on abortion, but surely we can agree on reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies in this country.

The — the reality of gun ownership may be different for hunters in rural Ohio than they are for those plagued by gang violence in Cleveland, but don’t tell me we can’t uphold the Second Amendment while keeping AK-47s out of the hands of criminals.

I know there are differences on same-sex marriage, but surely we can agree that our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters deserve to visit the person they love in a hospital and to live lives free of discrimination.

You know, passions may fly on immigration, but I don’t know anyone who benefits when a mother is separated from her infant child or an employer undercuts American wages by hiring illegal workers.

In that passage, Obama reaffirmed the centrist instincts he showed years ago but which he almost never acknowledged during his primary run. He may yet prove to have the wisdom to see where the right and the left are being too stubborn and extreme.

O.k. Good speech. I liked a lot of it. Here’s what I really didn’t like: He’s apparently going to provide more affordable health care, better education, more investment in green energy and more help for the out-of-work while lowering the taxes of 95% of Americans and on small businesses. Sure you are, Barack.

We don’t need to run up more debt for our nation. What I’ll be looking to hear from Obama in the next few months is how he’ll do what he says he’ll do. What will he give up first, his programs or his tax breaks? Something will have to give.

Obama hasn’t won me over but he’s given me enough reason to keep listening. Let’s see how McCain can do this week.


This entry was posted on Saturday, August 30th, 2008 and is filed under Barack, DNC. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Looking at Obama’s Speech”

  1. Mark O Says:

    Well, wouldn’t it be interesting if Hurricane Gustav knocks the RNC out of the news cycle next week. Act of God indeed.

  2. Avinash_Tyagi Says:

    No, just higher taxes on the rich and corporations, take all those billions away from shell and Exxon, cut defense spending, cut out those shiny new F-22′s and other cold war relics that we don’t need, there is a lot of glut in our spending we don’t need Alan,, like estate taxes, take all those millions and billions away from those dead dudes, reinstate the line item veto reform social security and Medicare, allow the government to pressure drug companies to drop their prices, tax companies that outsource, that’ll cover it all

  3. Tully Says:

    I heard the same speech in person months ago. Obama will give you everything you ever want or need. And a pony! Unless you’re rich or Bush, then we’re going to eat you because you’re evil.

    Add more cowbell, add McCain to the proposed bonepile, paint in some extra ponies for the carousel, and you’re there.

    Re-instate the line item veto? ROFLMAO. Better clear that with the Supremes first. I seem to recall a ruling about that.

  4. Avinash_Tyagi Says:

    Tully, Tully, Tully, Obama is going to have the strongest hand a dem president has had since the new deal, maybe even more now that dems don’t have to worry as much about the southern conservative dems, he’ll have appointment power to the supreme court, and may even be able to swing an amendment to the constitution or two.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: