The GOP is the party of “Country before party” and a previous Republician president , far from giving them well wishes as “good competition” waged war on secessionist rebels and tried their leaders for treason: that would be Abraham Lincoln.

Who represents the Republician party’s values now? Abraham Lincoln or Jefferson Davis?

Which consititution?? It spells it out clearly. The consitiutions of the United States and the State of Alaska.

Do elected officials have the option of selecting to uphold the “1791 constitution” or the “constitution, including all of the amendments”, or can they pick and choose? Can an elected official who thinks prohibition was a good thing really say, “I’ll uphold and defend the consitution, with all ammendments except for #21″???

Quite being a dork.

Actually that could use some clarification. What constitution are they talking about? The constitution of 1791 in its original form? The one we have now? Simply saying i am for the constitution is a total oversimplification of the arguments about how to interpret the constitution. Being for strict adherence to the original constitution is not something i would be so cool with. Slavery should not make a comeback, nor should women lose the vote and i like directly electing my senators.

states rights lost.

She calls them her “competition” and talks about shared vision of upholding the Alaska constitution.

I don’t see anything bad about a candidate who actually welcomes third parties.

Also this whole secessionist stuff is overblown. This is the top 2 of their platform.

# To effect full compliance with the constitutions of the United States of America and the State of Alaska.
# To support and defend States’ Rights, Individual Rights, Property Rights, and the Equal Footing Doctrine as guaranteed by the constitutions of the United States of America and the state of Alaska.

They are just the state Constitution Party that has some added history of once being secessionist. The only big thing that is controversial is that they would like a vote that they feel the citizens of Alaska should have had.

1) Remain a Territory.
2) Become a separate and Independent Nation.
3) Accept Commonwealth status.
4) Become a State.

But it’s not even on their platform just their website goals.

And Gary, look how little traction the Ayers association has gotten. I suspect the same with this.

Michael, I don’t see what this has to do with the G)P pointing out that John Kerry is a record-plumping douche.

can really say anything about what reasonable people think.

And here is an article by ABC’s Jake Tapper.

“let’s interpret this in the worst way possible”

and

6 degrees of Kevin Bacon

then it’s just a waste of time for reasonable folks. We’ve got no real evidence Palin is or was sympatico with secessionist goals. Suppose she gave a speech and tried to draw into the mainstream process a misguided group that nevertheless has some decent insights. That sounds like a very reasonable thing to do.

Michael, I don’t see what this has to do with the G)P pointing out that John Kerry is a record-plumping douche. I’m all for tit-for-tat, but in this case there does not, at this point, seem to be anything to this. What’s the point in hurling rash charges with little or no basis when the baselessness is bound to come clearly to light?

Won’t they ever learn?