But then again he has a penis.

What this country needs is a White House with knowledge and experience in rebuilding financial stability of a large scale. Mitt Romney fits this category. I am hopeful that the American public, including my fellow Republicans, see this VP pick for what it is: irresponsible political pandering with the fate of our fiscal stabilty hanging in the balance.

I don’t think you can call the Obama campaign misogynistic, as that would imply they believed in something. They believe in one thing only, The Pursuit of Power, and to that end everything is more or less acceptable. If that means trashing female candidates (even of their own party) or even to get surrogates to make the openly sexist arguments, than so be it. I’m sure they would prefer NOT to be associated with such arguments, but they are willing to make that deal with the devil.

The trouble is they are beginning to be held personally responsible for such tactics. You might argue that no one was a more cynical in their pursuit of electoral victory than Karl Rove (and you’d have a damn good point there) however, Bush remained the guy a lot of Americans would “like to have a beer with.” Right now Obama has a lead of almost 10 percentage points over McCain in the not so coveted “Very Unfavorable Rating” category. This depite the “McCain’s a cranky old guy” meme that was so popular with much of the media all summer. This is a danger zone for Obama, although his campaign seems a little slow on the uptake.

Obama needs the story lines to change and change dramatically. The debates can do that…but that sort of venue hasnt been the kindest to Obama so far. We shall see.

Ironically, the two candidates behave as if this anatomical observation were reversed.

Right. Obama is pro-choice, but Palin is pro-life. Go figure.

Ironically, the two candidates behave as if this anatomical observation were reversed.

…thank you, thank you, I’ll be here all week, remember to tip your waitress…

It’s gender identity politics, and it up to everyone’s individual milage as to how true you think it is that you have to be a woman to understand women, black to understand blacks, and so on and so forth.

I don’t really have a problem with folks voting this way. But it’s irritating when folks try to camouflage it under long-winded explanations that make it sound like its not what it is.

If Bruce had a real argument beyond Obama is a misogynist because someone at one of his rally’s wore a sexist t-shirt, she wouldn’t need to pretend that she was something that she’s clearly not in order to make her points.

If this article was entitled, “A President Bush and Mitt Romney supporter’s argument for McCain,” no one would be talking about it. But that’s all it is.

Better for women? Eh… maybe?

Better for feminism? Hell no.