Comments on: Ron Paul’s Presidential Endorsement: Chuck Baldwin? http://donklephant.com/2008/09/22/ron-pauls-presidential-endorsement-chuck-baldwin/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:09 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Jared McClure http://donklephant.com/2008/09/22/ron-pauls-presidential-endorsement-chuck-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-419756 Jared McClure Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:27:13 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=8204#comment-419756 The problem with Chuck Baldwin is that he's a theocrat... his version (or his party's version) of "liberty" is basically "Free if you're a Christian.... forced to act like a Christian if you're not." Plus the press conference invited some very non-libertarian minded retards, such as Ralph Nader. The problem with Chuck Baldwin is that he’s a theocrat… his version (or his party’s version) of “liberty” is basically “Free if you’re a Christian…. forced to act like a Christian if you’re not.” Plus the press conference invited some very non-libertarian minded retards, such as Ralph Nader.

]]> By: Robert Simon http://donklephant.com/2008/09/22/ron-pauls-presidential-endorsement-chuck-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-417101 Robert Simon Tue, 23 Sep 2008 23:10:16 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=8204#comment-417101 We need to unite the Liberty movement...if Bob Barr can't do it,maybe Baldwin can...We need to have an IMPACT! We need to unite the Liberty movement…if Bob Barr can’t do it,maybe Baldwin can…We need to have an IMPACT!

]]> By: Andres http://donklephant.com/2008/09/22/ron-pauls-presidential-endorsement-chuck-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-417049 Andres Tue, 23 Sep 2008 13:23:27 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=8204#comment-417049 The only support he 'lost' were the fad voters. People who believe in his honesty or his politics aren't going to be angry at him. Most did not expect him to do as well as he did, thanks largely in part to the internet. Bob Barr being a libertarian is like a panther being a small cat. Just in name. Much like Ron Paul being a Republican. Ron Paul stayed true to his word throughout his campaign. He did not run as a third party, even if it would've definitely taken votes away from both. He did not endorse either big party candidate because neither represented his views. Bob Barr was suspect from the beginning. If Chuck Baldwin represents his views the most, then more power to him. The only support he ‘lost’ were the fad voters. People who believe in his honesty or his politics aren’t going to be angry at him. Most did not expect him to do as well as he did, thanks largely in part to the internet.

Bob Barr being a libertarian is like a panther being a small cat. Just in name. Much like Ron Paul being a Republican.

Ron Paul stayed true to his word throughout his campaign. He did not run as a third party, even if it would’ve definitely taken votes away from both. He did not endorse either big party candidate because neither represented his views. Bob Barr was suspect from the beginning. If Chuck Baldwin represents his views the most, then more power to him.

]]> By: Ron Paul does not exist in my world anymore…. – Political Byline http://donklephant.com/2008/09/22/ron-pauls-presidential-endorsement-chuck-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-417043 Ron Paul does not exist in my world anymore…. – Political Byline Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:37:10 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=8204#comment-417043 [...] Beltway, Liberal Values, The Other McCain, distributedrepublic …, American Spectator, Wonkette, Donklephant and American Spectator, Ron Paul’s Lame Assed [...] [...] Beltway, Liberal Values, The Other McCain, distributedrepublic …, American Spectator, Wonkette, Donklephant and American Spectator, Ron Paul’s Lame Assed [...]

]]> By: Erik Sickinger http://donklephant.com/2008/09/22/ron-pauls-presidential-endorsement-chuck-baldwin/comment-page-1/#comment-417037 Erik Sickinger Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:52:18 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=8204#comment-417037 And endorsing Barr would have redeemed him, or kept him more relevant for a slightly longer time? How about the reality he was DEAD right on his doom and gloom predictions about the housing markets, and our economy? I mean DEAD ON. THAT is what he should be remembered for. Not who the hell he endorsed. Come on. And endorsing Barr would have redeemed him, or kept him more relevant for a slightly longer time?

How about the reality he was DEAD right on his doom and gloom predictions about the housing markets, and our economy?
I mean DEAD ON.

THAT is what he should be remembered for. Not who the hell he endorsed.
Come on.

]]>