<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CNN Post Debate Poll: Obama 51%, McCain 38%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNN Post Debate Snap Poll: Obama 58, McCain 31</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-3/#comment-420127</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNN Post Debate Snap Poll: Obama 58, McCain 31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-420127</guid>
		<description>[...] First Debate: Obama 51%, McCain 38% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] First Debate: Obama 51%, McCain 38% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNN Debate Snap Poll: Obama 54%, McCain 30%</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-3/#comment-419146</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CNN Debate Snap Poll: Obama 54%, McCain 30%</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-419146</guid>
		<description>[...] Wow. This is even bigger than last time, which was Obama 51%, McCain 38%. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wow. This is even bigger than last time, which was Obama 51%, McCain 38%. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-3/#comment-417778</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 13:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417778</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s interesting that McCain supporters insist to grow the economy you must cut taxes on big business. They say it will lead to them investing in the country and boosting the economy. But let&#039;s look at reality. The Bush tax cuts that businesses already use do little for our economy. Multinationals that headquarter in the U.S. give nothing back for the generous tax cuts bestowed upon them. They develop their overseas production sites because it&#039;s more profitable. All they&#039;ve done is create opportunity for countries like China, Mexico, and Vietnam. I fail to see how giving these companies more tax cuts will benefit the U.S. at all. However, Obama&#039;s plan to give tax incentives to businesses that actually hire people in their communities and contribute to the local economy would be effective.

By the way, have we all forgotten one of the major contributors to the Wall Street mess is the collapse of manufacturing in this country? It&#039;s the direct result of these big companies moving overseas and outsourcing. How many mortgages are going to be paid when people have no income?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s interesting that McCain supporters insist to grow the economy you must cut taxes on big business. They say it will lead to them investing in the country and boosting the economy. But let&#8217;s look at reality. The Bush tax cuts that businesses already use do little for our economy. Multinationals that headquarter in the U.S. give nothing back for the generous tax cuts bestowed upon them. They develop their overseas production sites because it&#8217;s more profitable. All they&#8217;ve done is create opportunity for countries like China, Mexico, and Vietnam. I fail to see how giving these companies more tax cuts will benefit the U.S. at all. However, Obama&#8217;s plan to give tax incentives to businesses that actually hire people in their communities and contribute to the local economy would be effective.</p>
<p>By the way, have we all forgotten one of the major contributors to the Wall Street mess is the collapse of manufacturing in this country? It&#8217;s the direct result of these big companies moving overseas and outsourcing. How many mortgages are going to be paid when people have no income?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417761</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417761</guid>
		<description>I feel like I watched a completely different debate than everyone else.  Okay, granted, I&#039;m fairly conservative, but I thought that Obama stumbled over all of his words with his uh,uh&#039;s and if anyone seemed condescending it was him.  I think McCain seems like a stern old grandpa, and allthough I&#039;d rather invite Obama over for dinner, I&#039;d trust McCain to house sit for me.  McCain seemed to really know what he was talking about and spoke clearly and relavently about the topics, while I felt that Obama spouted a bunch of pre-scripted blah blah blah.  McCain is passionate about what he speaks.  Obama seems to say what he thinks will win him the election and make people happy.  I&#039;m liking McCain more and more every time I hear him speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like I watched a completely different debate than everyone else.  Okay, granted, I&#8217;m fairly conservative, but I thought that Obama stumbled over all of his words with his uh,uh&#8217;s and if anyone seemed condescending it was him.  I think McCain seems like a stern old grandpa, and allthough I&#8217;d rather invite Obama over for dinner, I&#8217;d trust McCain to house sit for me.  McCain seemed to really know what he was talking about and spoke clearly and relavently about the topics, while I felt that Obama spouted a bunch of pre-scripted blah blah blah.  McCain is passionate about what he speaks.  Obama seems to say what he thinks will win him the election and make people happy.  I&#8217;m liking McCain more and more every time I hear him speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417745</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 17:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417745</guid>
		<description>Zac:

You have been staring into your cups far too long. Snap out of it. Time to wake up and let Palin fly the plane....err, the cup? You have to be kidding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zac:</p>
<p>You have been staring into your cups far too long. Snap out of it. Time to wake up and let Palin fly the plane&#8230;.err, the cup? You have to be kidding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steeeve</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417736</link>
		<dc:creator>steeeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417736</guid>
		<description>Erik Sickinger... That was the greatest comment ive seen on this website in the months ive been reading. I was going to reply to the cup rant but you handled it perfectly lol. I was laughing so hard when i read it.

As for DontBstupid.. please, take your own advice.. i dont think i have to remind you that republican politics brought about the great depression... AND the end of S&amp;L&#039;s AND the current economic problems we&#039;re facing.. wait, i guess i just did.. go take a history class. the &quot;free market solves everything&quot; mentality is wrong and flat-out STUPID. Economic growth when democrats are leading is slow and steady and redistributes the wealth from the ultra rich to the middle and lower class. Economic growth when republicans are in contol is erratic, often results in a recession or depression, and redistributes the wealth from the lower and middle class to the ultra rich.

If lying were a crime (and i really think it should be when it comes to politics) republicans would get 2% of the vote from the CEOs and billionaires. The only thing they have to run on are lies and moronic christians.. and ironically they only get the moronic christians to vote for them by... lying. They run on Abortion year after year and 6 of the last 8 years we had a rep majority congress and a rep president.. did they ban abortion? im pretty sure its still legal? why is that? OH YEAH! brainless christians will vote for not killing babies the next time around too!!! 

And i dont say this because im some nut who hates religion or whatever. i say this because i have an Aunt who was sucked into a Pentacostle (however thats spelled) church by her husband, and it is a cult. they have LITERALLY brainwashed her she used to be extremely intelligent, and had a great career as nurse, now she is a stay at home wife because in her church thats what women SHOULD BE and even though she used to be a democrat she now votes republican because her church preaches politics. I live in Texas and i see these churches all over the place with signs supporting republicans, or bashing pro-choice. I can say without a single doubt in my mind if jesus were here today he would not support republican ideals. im pretty sure he was a big advocate of free-will and helping the poor/needy.

i really cant understand it.. i cant figure out what the church gets out of telling people to vote republicans. there are only 2 possibilities.. its either some huge conspiracy, or they are simply idiots... and i think the latter is more likely

on another note.. this entire bailout plan is looking more and more like an attempt by the republicans to privatize the F.D.I.C. if that happens.. were all royally f****d</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erik Sickinger&#8230; That was the greatest comment ive seen on this website in the months ive been reading. I was going to reply to the cup rant but you handled it perfectly lol. I was laughing so hard when i read it.</p>
<p>As for DontBstupid.. please, take your own advice.. i dont think i have to remind you that republican politics brought about the great depression&#8230; AND the end of S&amp;L&#8217;s AND the current economic problems we&#8217;re facing.. wait, i guess i just did.. go take a history class. the &#8220;free market solves everything&#8221; mentality is wrong and flat-out STUPID. Economic growth when democrats are leading is slow and steady and redistributes the wealth from the ultra rich to the middle and lower class. Economic growth when republicans are in contol is erratic, often results in a recession or depression, and redistributes the wealth from the lower and middle class to the ultra rich.</p>
<p>If lying were a crime (and i really think it should be when it comes to politics) republicans would get 2% of the vote from the CEOs and billionaires. The only thing they have to run on are lies and moronic christians.. and ironically they only get the moronic christians to vote for them by&#8230; lying. They run on Abortion year after year and 6 of the last 8 years we had a rep majority congress and a rep president.. did they ban abortion? im pretty sure its still legal? why is that? OH YEAH! brainless christians will vote for not killing babies the next time around too!!! </p>
<p>And i dont say this because im some nut who hates religion or whatever. i say this because i have an Aunt who was sucked into a Pentacostle (however thats spelled) church by her husband, and it is a cult. they have LITERALLY brainwashed her she used to be extremely intelligent, and had a great career as nurse, now she is a stay at home wife because in her church thats what women SHOULD BE and even though she used to be a democrat she now votes republican because her church preaches politics. I live in Texas and i see these churches all over the place with signs supporting republicans, or bashing pro-choice. I can say without a single doubt in my mind if jesus were here today he would not support republican ideals. im pretty sure he was a big advocate of free-will and helping the poor/needy.</p>
<p>i really cant understand it.. i cant figure out what the church gets out of telling people to vote republicans. there are only 2 possibilities.. its either some huge conspiracy, or they are simply idiots&#8230; and i think the latter is more likely</p>
<p>on another note.. this entire bailout plan is looking more and more like an attempt by the republicans to privatize the F.D.I.C. if that happens.. were all royally f****d</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pfflyer</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417724</link>
		<dc:creator>pfflyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 01:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417724</guid>
		<description>Anyone who puts any stock in a Fox poll or a poll on Drudge report is truly misguided. With the country roughly split 50-50 democrat vs republican, any trustworthy poll on the debate should be fairly close to that split. Most reaction to the debate was fairly even with slight edges given to one or the other usually based on the commentators leanings.

Fox at 80%+ for McCain? Drudge with a roughly 75% poll for McCain? What a joke. All these polls show are the built in bias that these media outlets attract, heavily conservative. That&#039;s the real number inside the numbers for these polls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who puts any stock in a Fox poll or a poll on Drudge report is truly misguided. With the country roughly split 50-50 democrat vs republican, any trustworthy poll on the debate should be fairly close to that split. Most reaction to the debate was fairly even with slight edges given to one or the other usually based on the commentators leanings.</p>
<p>Fox at 80%+ for McCain? Drudge with a roughly 75% poll for McCain? What a joke. All these polls show are the built in bias that these media outlets attract, heavily conservative. That&#8217;s the real number inside the numbers for these polls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keryp at soundsoptical.com :: My take on the 1st Presidential Debate :: http://soundsoptical.com/blog</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417719</link>
		<dc:creator>Keryp at soundsoptical.com :: My take on the 1st Presidential Debate :: http://soundsoptical.com/blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 23:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417719</guid>
		<description>[...] so my opinions are moot.Â  Here&#8217;s the post-debate poll results, and another link, and just one more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so my opinions are moot.Â  Here&#8217;s the post-debate poll results, and another link, and just one more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KIMBER</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417714</link>
		<dc:creator>KIMBER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 22:11:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417714</guid>
		<description>McCain was passive-aggressive, condescending and dismissive throughout. Obama managed to remain dignified, quick and gracious while showing a command of the issues.
McCain is obsessively stuck in his 20th century mindset, while Obama is thoroughly rooted in the issues of the 21st. 
Obama won hands down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain was passive-aggressive, condescending and dismissive throughout. Obama managed to remain dignified, quick and gracious while showing a command of the issues.<br />
McCain is obsessively stuck in his 20th century mindset, while Obama is thoroughly rooted in the issues of the 21st.<br />
Obama won hands down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariano Bernardez</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417709</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariano Bernardez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417709</guid>
		<description>Obama has the upper hand: G.W. Bush&#039;s regime collapse. After 8 years, US is isolated in the world, surrounded by enemies fortified with 150 dollar oil and unified by 5 years of Iraq fruitless ocupation, on the verge of bankrupcy and economic recession and with a 9.8 trillion dollar deficit, bleeding at 12 billion dollars a month to keep and fortify in power a Shia, pro-Iranian regime that is already holding &quot;direct talks&quot; and joint foreign policy with Iran. Petreus Army has both hands caught in stopping the flood from the cracks in Afghanistan/Pakistan border and Iraq, thus unable to confront Iran or Al Qaeda, or to defend Israel for that matter. 
McCain&#039;s approach to foreign policy (and economics) is that of a kamikaze pilot: throw himself into the flames and die with the enemy -like Custer in Little Big Horn or Dabid Crockett in the Alamo-. 
With Bush&#039;s collapse hurricane winds behind, even Rin-Tin-Tin could beat McCain. 
In spite of the Clintons hanging from his throat and Pelosi-Reid-DNC&#039;s self-destructive powers, Obama will get into the White House in the same manner FDR did: out of voters&#039; horror with the alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama has the upper hand: G.W. Bush&#8217;s regime collapse. After 8 years, US is isolated in the world, surrounded by enemies fortified with 150 dollar oil and unified by 5 years of Iraq fruitless ocupation, on the verge of bankrupcy and economic recession and with a 9.8 trillion dollar deficit, bleeding at 12 billion dollars a month to keep and fortify in power a Shia, pro-Iranian regime that is already holding &#8220;direct talks&#8221; and joint foreign policy with Iran. Petreus Army has both hands caught in stopping the flood from the cracks in Afghanistan/Pakistan border and Iraq, thus unable to confront Iran or Al Qaeda, or to defend Israel for that matter.<br />
McCain&#8217;s approach to foreign policy (and economics) is that of a kamikaze pilot: throw himself into the flames and die with the enemy -like Custer in Little Big Horn or Dabid Crockett in the Alamo-.<br />
With Bush&#8217;s collapse hurricane winds behind, even Rin-Tin-Tin could beat McCain.<br />
In spite of the Clintons hanging from his throat and Pelosi-Reid-DNC&#8217;s self-destructive powers, Obama will get into the White House in the same manner FDR did: out of voters&#8217; horror with the alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barack Obama wins Debate! &#124; David Ortez</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417702</link>
		<dc:creator>Barack Obama wins Debate! &#124; David Ortez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417702</guid>
		<description>[...] to CNN, â€œFifty-one percent of those polled thought Obama did the better job in Friday night&#039;s debate, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to CNN, â€œFifty-one percent of those polled thought Obama did the better job in Friday night&#8217;s debate, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dixie</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417699</link>
		<dc:creator>Dixie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417699</guid>
		<description>Referring to Obama, someone stated above that
&quot;It is proved he changes positions just to try to get elected.&quot;

That is the best characterization of McCain, and not of Obama, I have heard thus far. McCain is constantly changing back and forth (translation: flip-flopping) and says he is for &quot;change.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Referring to Obama, someone stated above that<br />
&#8220;It is proved he changes positions just to try to get elected.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is the best characterization of McCain, and not of Obama, I have heard thus far. McCain is constantly changing back and forth (translation: flip-flopping) and says he is for &#8220;change.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE_Brankster</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417696</link>
		<dc:creator>THE_Brankster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417696</guid>
		<description>www.electiontaxes.com to see how much taxes each candidate will make you pay.

BTW, this american attitude of that people somehow &#039;deserve&#039; taxcuts is the same irresponsibility as demonstrated on Wall street.

Taxes are very good for a country. rules are even better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.electiontaxes.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.electiontaxes.com</a> to see how much taxes each candidate will make you pay.</p>
<p>BTW, this american attitude of that people somehow &#8216;deserve&#8217; taxcuts is the same irresponsibility as demonstrated on Wall street.</p>
<p>Taxes are very good for a country. rules are even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417695</link>
		<dc:creator>L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417695</guid>
		<description>DontBStupid, Obama will raise taxes to the levels of Clinton, and some will be even lower than Clinton, which saw a fairly rapid expansion in our economy.  Not to give credit to Clinton, but clearly these taxes did not shrink the economy.  

Research, find credible information, see your name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DontBStupid, Obama will raise taxes to the levels of Clinton, and some will be even lower than Clinton, which saw a fairly rapid expansion in our economy.  Not to give credit to Clinton, but clearly these taxes did not shrink the economy.  </p>
<p>Research, find credible information, see your name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yellow Dog Democrat</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417694</link>
		<dc:creator>Yellow Dog Democrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417694</guid>
		<description>Obama won, and here&#039;s why.  The country wants change.  Both candidates have two very different jobs to do.  John McCain has to prove he can bring about change.  Barack Obama has to prove he&#039;s qualified to be commander-in-chief.

John McCain did not offer ANY change last night on foreign policy or domestic policy, other than cutting government spending.  The problem with that is that he&#039;s been in Washington for 26 years and the only time we&#039;ve had a balanced budget is when a Democrat was in the White House.

Obama erased any doubts that he lacks an understanding of the world, and in fact demonstrated an understanding of its complexities.  He made it clear that he&#039;s willing to use military force to protect America&#039;s vital interests, a key threshold for Democrats.

AND, most importantly, is the demeanor of the two.  McCain came across as angry and partisan.  Obama was calm and non-partisan.  McCain&#039;s anger will appeal to those who are angry about the economy right now, but anger is a sugar rush that doesn&#039;t last very long.  Partisanship appeals to his base, but the undecideds in the middle ARE looking for someone who is going to bring the country together to solve problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama won, and here&#8217;s why.  The country wants change.  Both candidates have two very different jobs to do.  John McCain has to prove he can bring about change.  Barack Obama has to prove he&#8217;s qualified to be commander-in-chief.</p>
<p>John McCain did not offer ANY change last night on foreign policy or domestic policy, other than cutting government spending.  The problem with that is that he&#8217;s been in Washington for 26 years and the only time we&#8217;ve had a balanced budget is when a Democrat was in the White House.</p>
<p>Obama erased any doubts that he lacks an understanding of the world, and in fact demonstrated an understanding of its complexities.  He made it clear that he&#8217;s willing to use military force to protect America&#8217;s vital interests, a key threshold for Democrats.</p>
<p>AND, most importantly, is the demeanor of the two.  McCain came across as angry and partisan.  Obama was calm and non-partisan.  McCain&#8217;s anger will appeal to those who are angry about the economy right now, but anger is a sugar rush that doesn&#8217;t last very long.  Partisanship appeals to his base, but the undecideds in the middle ARE looking for someone who is going to bring the country together to solve problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leo</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417689</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 15:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417689</guid>
		<description>Dear Don&#039;tBstupid...

Obama&#039;s cutting the taxes of 95% of the Americans WHO DO PAY TAXES. 

The country can&#039;t cut the taxes of people who already pay none. Are you suggesting that should be possible?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Don&#8217;tBstupid&#8230;</p>
<p>Obama&#8217;s cutting the taxes of 95% of the Americans WHO DO PAY TAXES. </p>
<p>The country can&#8217;t cut the taxes of people who already pay none. Are you suggesting that should be possible?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carla</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417685</link>
		<dc:creator>Carla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417685</guid>
		<description>McCain used his years of experience and knowledge of foreign policy well.  We expected him to be able to do that.  This was a debate about foreign policy.  However, Obama did so well in showing his also deep understanding about foreign policy that Mc Cain wasn&#039;t able to &quot;score any real points &quot; with voters.  That&#039;s what he was supposed to do last night.  McCain talked about flexibility in the next president regarding foreign policy, but there was no flexibility in either his own demeanor or in his attitude.  He has only one view - bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran and war in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain used his years of experience and knowledge of foreign policy well.  We expected him to be able to do that.  This was a debate about foreign policy.  However, Obama did so well in showing his also deep understanding about foreign policy that Mc Cain wasn&#8217;t able to &#8220;score any real points &#8221; with voters.  That&#8217;s what he was supposed to do last night.  McCain talked about flexibility in the next president regarding foreign policy, but there was no flexibility in either his own demeanor or in his attitude.  He has only one view &#8211; bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran and war in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea Snell</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417684</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Snell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417684</guid>
		<description>The Fox News poll had McCain winning with 82% of the vote. I thought McCain won. Obama looked like a high school debate captain that had looked up as many arguments as he could to support his positions, McCain looked like a genuine leader.
   I did wish McCain had defended himself in response to the &quot;you were wrong&quot; rant.  McCain said we would be greeted as liberators, we were. Even Obama wrote that when they pulled down the statue he wondered if he had been wrong to oppose the war. We defeated Saddam Hussein&#039;s regime just as McCain predicted. Unfortunately McCain was also right in predicting that there would be problems if we did not send in more troops - but if his advice had been taken that could have been averted.
   The one area where McCain might have been wrong was WMDs but, if so, his mistake was shared by the intelligence agencies of several countries. Obama admitted that he does not know what he would have done if he&#039;d seen the intelligence shown to Senate members at the time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fox News poll had McCain winning with 82% of the vote. I thought McCain won. Obama looked like a high school debate captain that had looked up as many arguments as he could to support his positions, McCain looked like a genuine leader.<br />
   I did wish McCain had defended himself in response to the &#8220;you were wrong&#8221; rant.  McCain said we would be greeted as liberators, we were. Even Obama wrote that when they pulled down the statue he wondered if he had been wrong to oppose the war. We defeated Saddam Hussein&#8217;s regime just as McCain predicted. Unfortunately McCain was also right in predicting that there would be problems if we did not send in more troops &#8211; but if his advice had been taken that could have been averted.<br />
   The one area where McCain might have been wrong was WMDs but, if so, his mistake was shared by the intelligence agencies of several countries. Obama admitted that he does not know what he would have done if he&#8217;d seen the intelligence shown to Senate members at the time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fr. Rob Johansen</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417683</link>
		<dc:creator>Fr. Rob Johansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417683</guid>
		<description>If you want to understand the CNN poll, and the &quot;Obama Win&quot;, read a little farther down in the story of the poll:

&lt;i&gt;The results may be favoring Obama simply because more Democrats than Republicans tuned in to the debate. Of the debate-watchers questioned in this poll, 41 percent of the respondents identified themselves as Democrats, 27 percent as Republicans and 30 percent as independents.&lt;/i&gt;

Gee, they oversampled Democrats by 14 percentage points, and Obama comes out as the winner. What a surprise!

The headline doesn&#039;t always tell you the real story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to understand the CNN poll, and the &#8220;Obama Win&#8221;, read a little farther down in the story of the poll:</p>
<p><i>The results may be favoring Obama simply because more Democrats than Republicans tuned in to the debate. Of the debate-watchers questioned in this poll, 41 percent of the respondents identified themselves as Democrats, 27 percent as Republicans and 30 percent as independents.</i></p>
<p>Gee, they oversampled Democrats by 14 percentage points, and Obama comes out as the winner. What a surprise!</p>
<p>The headline doesn&#8217;t always tell you the real story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/09/26/cnn-post-debate-poll-obama-51-mccain-38/comment-page-2/#comment-417681</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8389#comment-417681</guid>
		<description>#  steve Says:
September 27th, 2008 at 12:48 am

&lt;i&gt;&quot;Wow, thereâ€™s a different story told by Matt Drudge on the drudge report. He has a live poll going there and the results are about as different as could be.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
*****************************************************************

Of course!  Drudge writes his own stories!  They&#039;re fiction.  Alexandra Polier, anyone?

I&#039;ll throw in my own peals of laughter with Todd&#039;s--John Locke, what were &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; watching?

Of course, we needn&#039;t rely on our memories of last night; CSPAN will no doubt replay this thing throughout the weekend.

And of course, some of us saved it to hard disc... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  steve Says:<br />
September 27th, 2008 at 12:48 am</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Wow, thereâ€™s a different story told by Matt Drudge on the drudge report. He has a live poll going there and the results are about as different as could be.&#8221;</i><br />
*****************************************************************</p>
<p>Of course!  Drudge writes his own stories!  They&#8217;re fiction.  Alexandra Polier, anyone?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll throw in my own peals of laughter with Todd&#8217;s&#8211;John Locke, what were <i>you</i> watching?</p>
<p>Of course, we needn&#8217;t rely on our memories of last night; CSPAN will no doubt replay this thing throughout the weekend.</p>
<p>And of course, some of us saved it to hard disc&#8230; ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
