<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krauthammer: It&#8217;s Over</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: noaf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418583</link>
		<dc:creator>noaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418583</guid>
		<description>Obama is winning because he out-organized and out-thought McCain. That&#039;s what being an organizer will do for you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is winning because he out-organized and out-thought McCain. That&#8217;s what being an organizer will do for you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418545</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418545</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Letâ€™s be honest here, Obama is a black liberal Democrat with a funny name. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ok, let&#039;s be honest. Great idea. This doesn&#039;t matter nearly as much as it used to, and to many folks it doesn&#039;t matter at all. 

Let&#039;s be even more honest. Some people have a vested interest in continuing to insist that this still matters quite a bit, and continually keep trying to inflate folks&#039; impressions of how much it&#039;s mattering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Letâ€™s be honest here, Obama is a black liberal Democrat with a funny name. </p></blockquote>
<p>Ok, let&#8217;s be honest. Great idea. This doesn&#8217;t matter nearly as much as it used to, and to many folks it doesn&#8217;t matter at all. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s be even more honest. Some people have a vested interest in continuing to insist that this still matters quite a bit, and continually keep trying to inflate folks&#8217; impressions of how much it&#8217;s mattering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lit3Bolt</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418542</link>
		<dc:creator>Lit3Bolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418542</guid>
		<description>Fine points by people here.  To help sum it up for people so they can seem prescient, McCain will lose because of:

1. The economy
2. The war(s)
3. McCain campaign blunders
4. Obama campaign advantages (money, sane managers, etc)
5. Public souring on Republicans
6. General conservative unease with McCain

Can anyone think of any more points?  I mean, let&#039;s be honest here, Obama is a black liberal Democrat with a funny name.  He should have been beated down multiple times before this, and McCain should have plumbed the Clinton-Obama divide for maximum effect.  Instead he dithered too long, then played his supposed trump, Palin, without considering alternatives.

With the economy going south, it looks like pundits are more interested in keeping their jobs and readership and credibility instead of being complete propaganda organs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine points by people here.  To help sum it up for people so they can seem prescient, McCain will lose because of:</p>
<p>1. The economy<br />
2. The war(s)<br />
3. McCain campaign blunders<br />
4. Obama campaign advantages (money, sane managers, etc)<br />
5. Public souring on Republicans<br />
6. General conservative unease with McCain</p>
<p>Can anyone think of any more points?  I mean, let&#8217;s be honest here, Obama is a black liberal Democrat with a funny name.  He should have been beated down multiple times before this, and McCain should have plumbed the Clinton-Obama divide for maximum effect.  Instead he dithered too long, then played his supposed trump, Palin, without considering alternatives.</p>
<p>With the economy going south, it looks like pundits are more interested in keeping their jobs and readership and credibility instead of being complete propaganda organs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418530</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 18:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418530</guid>
		<description>Nah, I agree with BBQ. The general public has neither the time nor the inclination for the sophisticated political calculus that various kranky wonks like us prefer.

I strongly suspect the general public&#039;s calculus as manifested in Obama&#039;s poll surge of the last 3 weeks goes about like this:

Wall Street screwed up big time. 
This has screwed the general public big time. 
The GOP is by far the party more cozy with Wall Street.

Game. Set. Match.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, I agree with BBQ. The general public has neither the time nor the inclination for the sophisticated political calculus that various kranky wonks like us prefer.</p>
<p>I strongly suspect the general public&#8217;s calculus as manifested in Obama&#8217;s poll surge of the last 3 weeks goes about like this:</p>
<p>Wall Street screwed up big time.<br />
This has screwed the general public big time.<br />
The GOP is by far the party more cozy with Wall Street.</p>
<p>Game. Set. Match.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheMiddle</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418521</link>
		<dc:creator>TheMiddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418521</guid>
		<description>BBQ;

The economy hurt McCain, yes. But a savvy pol, Republican or Democrat, knows how to use any bad turn of events to his advantage. McCain tried, but failed to push the idea that he could be the savior of Wall Street and therefor Main Street. Had he been able to show himself more talented in the economic arena, and not said things like, &quot;[I don&#039;t really know much about the economy,]&quot;, or, &quot;[the fundamentals of our economy are sound,]&quot; he might have had a chance. Obama played it safe, didn&#039;t say or do much, and therefor didn&#039;t hurt himself. However, had McCain been able to display a strong grasp of the economy (or chosen Mitt Romney as his running mate), he&#039;d almost certainly have turned the tables on a complacent Obama.

The reason why the economic downturn helped Obama as much as it did are because of the mistakes McCain made. Whats more -- and I think this is the biggie - he never set one specific line of attack on Obama. First it was inexperienced, then it was celebrity (which was actually working), and so on. Had he stuck with one consistent method of attack, and really driven that point home, he might have had a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BBQ;</p>
<p>The economy hurt McCain, yes. But a savvy pol, Republican or Democrat, knows how to use any bad turn of events to his advantage. McCain tried, but failed to push the idea that he could be the savior of Wall Street and therefor Main Street. Had he been able to show himself more talented in the economic arena, and not said things like, &#8220;[I don't really know much about the economy,]&#8220;, or, &#8220;[the fundamentals of our economy are sound,]&#8221; he might have had a chance. Obama played it safe, didn&#8217;t say or do much, and therefor didn&#8217;t hurt himself. However, had McCain been able to display a strong grasp of the economy (or chosen Mitt Romney as his running mate), he&#8217;d almost certainly have turned the tables on a complacent Obama.</p>
<p>The reason why the economic downturn helped Obama as much as it did are because of the mistakes McCain made. Whats more &#8212; and I think this is the biggie &#8211; he never set one specific line of attack on Obama. First it was inexperienced, then it was celebrity (which was actually working), and so on. Had he stuck with one consistent method of attack, and really driven that point home, he might have had a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BBQ</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418520</link>
		<dc:creator>BBQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418520</guid>
		<description>Justin, how can you write all that analysis about why McCain is losing but forget to mention the main reason he is losing. It&#039;s the economy stupid. The rest is just overblown partisan talk. It&#039;s a factor but much much smaller than you think it is. If it wasn&#039;t for the economy and the bailout issue McCain would probably still be losing but not by nearly by as much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, how can you write all that analysis about why McCain is losing but forget to mention the main reason he is losing. It&#8217;s the economy stupid. The rest is just overblown partisan talk. It&#8217;s a factor but much much smaller than you think it is. If it wasn&#8217;t for the economy and the bailout issue McCain would probably still be losing but not by nearly by as much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike mcEachran</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418516</link>
		<dc:creator>mike mcEachran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418516</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s interesting that Republicans never really trusted McCain, and that his abismal campaign performance has essentially proven them right.  I doubt we&#039;ll see many pols in the coming years declaring themselves &quot;Maverick&quot;.  &quot;Maverick&quot; may now forever be associated with rash incompetence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that Republicans never really trusted McCain, and that his abismal campaign performance has essentially proven them right.  I doubt we&#8217;ll see many pols in the coming years declaring themselves &#8220;Maverick&#8221;.  &#8220;Maverick&#8221; may now forever be associated with rash incompetence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/03/krauthammer-its-over/comment-page-1/#comment-418515</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 16:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8671#comment-418515</guid>
		<description>Hah! Check the live debate thread, I called this last night. 

Krauthammer stole my meme! 
Krauthammer stole my meme! 
Krauthammer stole my meme!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hah! Check the live debate thread, I called this last night. </p>
<p>Krauthammer stole my meme!<br />
Krauthammer stole my meme!<br />
Krauthammer stole my meme!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
