<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s Homeowner Bailout Plan is Flawed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/09/mccains-homeowner-bailout-plan-is-flawed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/09/mccains-homeowner-bailout-plan-is-flawed/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Booker Rising</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/09/mccains-homeowner-bailout-plan-is-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-419362</link>
		<dc:creator>Booker Rising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8918#comment-419362</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;McCain's Homeowner Bailout Plan Is Flawed...&lt;/strong&gt;

Argues Alan Stewart Carl, a moderate blogger, about Sen. John McCain's proposal: "When John McCain first announced his homeowner bailout plan, called the American Homeownership Rescue Plan, the description of the plan indicated that the government wo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>McCain&#8217;s Homeowner Bailout Plan Is Flawed&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Argues Alan Stewart Carl, a moderate blogger, about Sen. John McCain&#8217;s proposal: &#8220;When John McCain first announced his homeowner bailout plan, called the American Homeownership Rescue Plan, the description of the plan indicated that the government wo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/09/mccains-homeowner-bailout-plan-is-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-419361</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8918#comment-419361</guid>
		<description>I've been leaning toward McCain this entire election, but it seems every time I start convincing myself I can overlook his shortcomings and vote for him anyway, he gives me another reason not to.    I haven't learned much about the 3rd party candidates yet, because I've always subscribed to the "that's throwing away your vote" philosophy.  But I think I might check out some of their websites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been leaning toward McCain this entire election, but it seems every time I start convincing myself I can overlook his shortcomings and vote for him anyway, he gives me another reason not to.    I haven&#8217;t learned much about the 3rd party candidates yet, because I&#8217;ve always subscribed to the &#8220;that&#8217;s throwing away your vote&#8221; philosophy.  But I think I might check out some of their websites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Stewart Carl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/09/mccains-homeowner-bailout-plan-is-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-419341</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Stewart Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8918#comment-419341</guid>
		<description>Ben: Hmmm, we seem to be in agreement. Not sure why you think I'm missing the bigger picture. But thanks for the more thorough review of the issue. I was focusing specifically on the McCain plan and not broadly on the existing remedies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben: Hmmm, we seem to be in agreement. Not sure why you think I&#8217;m missing the bigger picture. But thanks for the more thorough review of the issue. I was focusing specifically on the McCain plan and not broadly on the existing remedies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenG</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/09/mccains-homeowner-bailout-plan-is-flawed/comment-page-1/#comment-419337</link>
		<dc:creator>BenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=8918#comment-419337</guid>
		<description>Alan, Alan, Alan,

While i agree with your final analysis of the 'simple mistake' the McCain camp now admits they made concerning the change in the wording of their buyout plan, I think you're missing the big picture. 

First is the erratic behavior of McCain's campaign. There's no rhyme or reason. How do you think his latest economic plan would square with the House Repubs when he so 'heroically' came to their support against the Feds current economic plan? This new plan would enrage them more than anything for the reasons you mentioned - the moral hazard of letting everybody off the hook. That certainly goes against their 'Fiscal Conservative' core. 

Secondly, the way it's set up now, the Fed will try to get stability in the market by obtaining some sort of value for each mortgage backed security. How they will do this is the great mystery everyone's waiting to see. McCain's plan would blow that up by preventing the free market to negotiate this crucial dollar amount. Why would the holders of these mortgage securities take pennies on the dollar when this plan- to give them 100% face value- is on the table? 

The other thing that further complicates the matter is the Credit Default Swaps that the troubled 'banks' got involved in. That's where the really big bucks were squandered, and they were supposed to minimize risk!. They say that the value of the actual mortgage securities on the books is only about 300 billion (only?) and not that much of it is actually bad debt. How McCain's plan would deal with those complicated financial instruments nobody knows. I wonder how many in the business really care?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, Alan, Alan,</p>
<p>While i agree with your final analysis of the &#8217;simple mistake&#8217; the McCain camp now admits they made concerning the change in the wording of their buyout plan, I think you&#8217;re missing the big picture. </p>
<p>First is the erratic behavior of McCain&#8217;s campaign. There&#8217;s no rhyme or reason. How do you think his latest economic plan would square with the House Repubs when he so &#8216;heroically&#8217; came to their support against the Feds current economic plan? This new plan would enrage them more than anything for the reasons you mentioned - the moral hazard of letting everybody off the hook. That certainly goes against their &#8216;Fiscal Conservative&#8217; core. </p>
<p>Secondly, the way it&#8217;s set up now, the Fed will try to get stability in the market by obtaining some sort of value for each mortgage backed security. How they will do this is the great mystery everyone&#8217;s waiting to see. McCain&#8217;s plan would blow that up by preventing the free market to negotiate this crucial dollar amount. Why would the holders of these mortgage securities take pennies on the dollar when this plan- to give them 100% face value- is on the table? </p>
<p>The other thing that further complicates the matter is the Credit Default Swaps that the troubled &#8216;banks&#8217; got involved in. That&#8217;s where the really big bucks were squandered, and they were supposed to minimize risk!. They say that the value of the actual mortgage securities on the books is only about 300 billion (only?) and not that much of it is actually bad debt. How McCain&#8217;s plan would deal with those complicated financial instruments nobody knows. I wonder how many in the business really care?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.986 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
