<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CitizenSugar: Who Won the Debate, Part II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/citizensugar-who-won-the-debate-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/citizensugar-who-won-the-debate-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kaseyd</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/citizensugar-who-won-the-debate-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-420198</link>
		<dc:creator>kaseyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9213#comment-420198</guid>
		<description>i disagree. i think the pro-choice label is accurate because when faced with a pregnancy, women can choose what they want to do. that is the basis of being pro-choice. not all women choose to abort, however that is one of many options. when people push the term &quot;pro-abortion&quot; it comes across in nuance as being the only option each and every time. does that make sense? i&#039;m hungover today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i disagree. i think the pro-choice label is accurate because when faced with a pregnancy, women can choose what they want to do. that is the basis of being pro-choice. not all women choose to abort, however that is one of many options. when people push the term &#8220;pro-abortion&#8221; it comes across in nuance as being the only option each and every time. does that make sense? i&#8217;m hungover today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newton Minow</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/citizensugar-who-won-the-debate-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-420116</link>
		<dc:creator>Newton Minow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 03:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9213#comment-420116</guid>
		<description>The only part of this I take issue with is the description of Pro-Choice vs Pro-Abortion. While I&#039;m not in favor of outlawing abortion, I think the Pro-choice label is a deliberate attempt to hide the reality of the situation. The reality is that the Pro-choice argument is an argument in favor of allowing abortion, and trying to hide that is just silly. No-one is in favor of abortion (vs not getting pregnant in the first place), but Pro-Choice is as meaningless a term as Pro-Abortion. 

And more importantly, is abortion really an issue that is a supremely important measure for a presidential candidate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only part of this I take issue with is the description of Pro-Choice vs Pro-Abortion. While I&#8217;m not in favor of outlawing abortion, I think the Pro-choice label is a deliberate attempt to hide the reality of the situation. The reality is that the Pro-choice argument is an argument in favor of allowing abortion, and trying to hide that is just silly. No-one is in favor of abortion (vs not getting pregnant in the first place), but Pro-Choice is as meaningless a term as Pro-Abortion. </p>
<p>And more importantly, is abortion really an issue that is a supremely important measure for a presidential candidate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
