<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain&#8217;s New Strategy: I&#8217;ll Lose Because Of Voter Fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:17:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-420228</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9172#comment-420228</guid>
		<description>ACORN employed 1,300 temp workers for voter registration. Those workers registered 1.3 million valid new voters. In every batch of workers, you will have a few bad apples. Does that justify it? No. But, it&#039;s true that ACORN has complied with investigations 100% and every bit of evidence there is against ACORN, ACORN has provided. Voter registration fraud has never been proven to lead to voter fraud. ACORN has been investigated in every election since 2000 in multiple states, and although specific workers (that ACORN turned in for prosecution) have been found guilty, every case against ACORN as a whole in 2004 was dismissed for lack of evidence. As for the &quot;absentee ballots for phony voters sent directly to ACORN workers,&quot; if this is the case, they would not be counted. One vote per social security number. You have to have a social security number to process an absentee ballot. And yes, ACORN must by law turn in all ballots, even if they are for mickey mouse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACORN employed 1,300 temp workers for voter registration. Those workers registered 1.3 million valid new voters. In every batch of workers, you will have a few bad apples. Does that justify it? No. But, it&#8217;s true that ACORN has complied with investigations 100% and every bit of evidence there is against ACORN, ACORN has provided. Voter registration fraud has never been proven to lead to voter fraud. ACORN has been investigated in every election since 2000 in multiple states, and although specific workers (that ACORN turned in for prosecution) have been found guilty, every case against ACORN as a whole in 2004 was dismissed for lack of evidence. As for the &#8220;absentee ballots for phony voters sent directly to ACORN workers,&#8221; if this is the case, they would not be counted. One vote per social security number. You have to have a social security number to process an absentee ballot. And yes, ACORN must by law turn in all ballots, even if they are for mickey mouse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Stewart Carl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-419891</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Stewart Carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 20:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9172#comment-419891</guid>
		<description>This is eerily similar to the whispers that Diebold was going to steal the election for Bush in 2004. I guess this is how you run an underdog campaign these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is eerily similar to the whispers that Diebold was going to steal the election for Bush in 2004. I guess this is how you run an underdog campaign these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-419881</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9172#comment-419881</guid>
		<description>I think it is the $700,000 the Obama campaign gave them that ties the Obama campaign to ACRON.  (Are you saying it doesn&#039;t?)

Besides, isn&#039;t voter registration fraud a path to vote fraud?  I mean there are already reports of absentee ballots for phony voters being sent directly to ACORN workers.  They wouldn&#039;t have been able to do that without the registration fraud.

Feel free to discount McCain&#039;s specific concerns...but you could throw a little concern about the disregard for the law being perpetrated by ACORN.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is the $700,000 the Obama campaign gave them that ties the Obama campaign to ACRON.  (Are you saying it doesn&#8217;t?)</p>
<p>Besides, isn&#8217;t voter registration fraud a path to vote fraud?  I mean there are already reports of absentee ballots for phony voters being sent directly to ACORN workers.  They wouldn&#8217;t have been able to do that without the registration fraud.</p>
<p>Feel free to discount McCain&#8217;s specific concerns&#8230;but you could throw a little concern about the disregard for the law being perpetrated by ACORN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julie</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-419878</link>
		<dc:creator>julie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9172#comment-419878</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard that ACORN  must, BY LAW, turn in all the forms, even ones that seem blatantly erroneous (which they flag as such).  Does anyone know if this is true?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard that ACORN  must, BY LAW, turn in all the forms, even ones that seem blatantly erroneous (which they flag as such).  Does anyone know if this is true?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdgeorge</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/15/mccains-new-strategy-ill-lose-because-of-voter-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-419872</link>
		<dc:creator>mdgeorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9172#comment-419872</guid>
		<description>From what I&#039;ve heard, there&#039;s not a lack of oversight by ACORN.  They&#039;re legally obligated to submit all of the forms they collect (even Mickey Mouse), and they do a reasonably good job of flagging suspicious registrations for the authorities.  As soon as this story started circulating, I started thinking it was intended to cast doubt on the election outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve heard, there&#8217;s not a lack of oversight by ACORN.  They&#8217;re legally obligated to submit all of the forms they collect (even Mickey Mouse), and they do a reasonably good job of flagging suspicious registrations for the authorities.  As soon as this story started circulating, I started thinking it was intended to cast doubt on the election outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
