<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joe Klein Banned From McCain Plane?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/21/joe-klein-banned-from-mccain-plane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/21/joe-klein-banned-from-mccain-plane/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/21/joe-klein-banned-from-mccain-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-420747</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9465#comment-420747</guid>
		<description>The basic argument for why Klein &quot;should&quot; be let on the plane is tradition, right? I mean, there&#039;s no fundamental reason why the campaigns should fund the media&#039;s transportation, right? And if there are a fixed number of seats and more asses than seats, it makes sense to prefer people on your side first, neutrals next, and foes last, right?

I fully support Klein&#039;s right to free speech and his right to access as a prominent member of the media. But I don&#039;t think John McCain should be expected to &lt;i&gt;subsidize&lt;/i&gt; the efforts of his most vocal critics unless he feels like it. 

So, suppose we asked McCain or whoever else decided why Klein didn&#039;t get a ride. Suppose further that John McCain&#039;s honest answer was &quot;because F*ck him, that&#039;s why.&quot; I have no problem with that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The basic argument for why Klein &#8220;should&#8221; be let on the plane is tradition, right? I mean, there&#8217;s no fundamental reason why the campaigns should fund the media&#8217;s transportation, right? And if there are a fixed number of seats and more asses than seats, it makes sense to prefer people on your side first, neutrals next, and foes last, right?</p>
<p>I fully support Klein&#8217;s right to free speech and his right to access as a prominent member of the media. But I don&#8217;t think John McCain should be expected to <i>subsidize</i> the efforts of his most vocal critics unless he feels like it. </p>
<p>So, suppose we asked McCain or whoever else decided why Klein didn&#8217;t get a ride. Suppose further that John McCain&#8217;s honest answer was &#8220;because F*ck him, that&#8217;s why.&#8221; I have no problem with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/21/joe-klein-banned-from-mccain-plane/comment-page-1/#comment-420737</link>
		<dc:creator>Zimmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 15:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9465#comment-420737</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got that wrong:

Similarly, other Time magazine staffers, including Washington bureau chief Jay Carney, &quot; reporter Michael Scherer, and Mark Halperin (The Page), have not had a problem with access.

Note the NOT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got that wrong:</p>
<p>Similarly, other Time magazine staffers, including Washington bureau chief Jay Carney, &#8221; reporter Michael Scherer, and Mark Halperin (The Page), have not had a problem with access.</p>
<p>Note the NOT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
