<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warmongers for Obama!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/22/warmongers-for-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/22/warmongers-for-obama/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack buying the election?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/22/warmongers-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-421632</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Barack buying the election?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9547#comment-421632</guid>
		<description>[...] my previous post, commenter BenG suggested that I was swimming in &#8220;a bottomless pool of cynicism&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my previous post, commenter BenG suggested that I was swimming in &#8220;a bottomless pool of cynicism&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Regis</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/22/warmongers-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-421031</link>
		<dc:creator>Regis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 19:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9547#comment-421031</guid>
		<description>Colin Powell has already explained, indirectly, what he thought his role was in the Bush Administration. He recalled the discussions and disagreements Harry Truman had with his Secretary of State George Marshall concerning the recognition of Israel.  Bottom line:  Marshall, like the good soldier he was, realized that no one voted for him and gave his full support to Truman.  Was that the right thing to do?  It probably depends on how strongly Marshall felt about the issue.  Myself, I believe that in Powell&#039;s case resignation would have been the more honorable approach.  That is always an option for a good soldier.  I believe Powell misconstrued Marshall&#039;s rationale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin Powell has already explained, indirectly, what he thought his role was in the Bush Administration. He recalled the discussions and disagreements Harry Truman had with his Secretary of State George Marshall concerning the recognition of Israel.  Bottom line:  Marshall, like the good soldier he was, realized that no one voted for him and gave his full support to Truman.  Was that the right thing to do?  It probably depends on how strongly Marshall felt about the issue.  Myself, I believe that in Powell&#8217;s case resignation would have been the more honorable approach.  That is always an option for a good soldier.  I believe Powell misconstrued Marshall&#8217;s rationale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BenG</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/22/warmongers-for-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-420993</link>
		<dc:creator>BenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=9547#comment-420993</guid>
		<description>Oh my, where to begin. First of all, it was a great post, very insightful and I learned a lot, so thanks, I&#039;m glad you bothered to take the time and effort. 

My first impression is, from the bottomless pool of cynicism you seem to swim in concerning BOTH political parties, i think it&#039;s good for you to get this stuff off your chest - venting is good, or else in a few years you&#039;ll just walk around talking to yourself like a crazy person. Trust me, when you know all the answers but have no control of the situation, it&#039;s a long road to nowhere.

Secondly, how can you, given your sharp criticism of the recent Republican leadership, not be looking forward to the change Obama offers in his campaign? I realize you&#039;re equally pessimistic about the Dems. ability to enact such a forward outlook that Obama proposes, but, given the alternative offered by the McCain/Palin ticket, how can you not give the Dems their go at it? 

Now, it&#039;s obvious that what scares you is the one sided approach that the Dems will be able to have at it. Unfortunately, this seems necessary because the Repubs are showing no signs of being capable of bipartisan compromise in solving any of our immediate problems. This was proven to me during the economic &#039;bailout&#039; negotiations recently passed in congress. 

 I judge things for what I see, and the economic meltdown didn&#039;t just happen to put Obama over the top in this election process, as you&#039;ve suggested. It was not simply a matter of circumstance that will, as you put it: &quot;Under this cloud the electorate will sweep the incumbent party out and the opposition party in.&quot; Rather, it was how Mr. Obama handled the crisis compared to how Mr. McCain bungled it. I, as did the whole world, saw it for what it was and, without partisan spectacles on to screw up your vision, it became easy for me to see who may be able to best get us out of this mess.  One can hope, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, where to begin. First of all, it was a great post, very insightful and I learned a lot, so thanks, I&#8217;m glad you bothered to take the time and effort. </p>
<p>My first impression is, from the bottomless pool of cynicism you seem to swim in concerning BOTH political parties, i think it&#8217;s good for you to get this stuff off your chest &#8211; venting is good, or else in a few years you&#8217;ll just walk around talking to yourself like a crazy person. Trust me, when you know all the answers but have no control of the situation, it&#8217;s a long road to nowhere.</p>
<p>Secondly, how can you, given your sharp criticism of the recent Republican leadership, not be looking forward to the change Obama offers in his campaign? I realize you&#8217;re equally pessimistic about the Dems. ability to enact such a forward outlook that Obama proposes, but, given the alternative offered by the McCain/Palin ticket, how can you not give the Dems their go at it? </p>
<p>Now, it&#8217;s obvious that what scares you is the one sided approach that the Dems will be able to have at it. Unfortunately, this seems necessary because the Repubs are showing no signs of being capable of bipartisan compromise in solving any of our immediate problems. This was proven to me during the economic &#8216;bailout&#8217; negotiations recently passed in congress. </p>
<p> I judge things for what I see, and the economic meltdown didn&#8217;t just happen to put Obama over the top in this election process, as you&#8217;ve suggested. It was not simply a matter of circumstance that will, as you put it: &#8220;Under this cloud the electorate will sweep the incumbent party out and the opposition party in.&#8221; Rather, it was how Mr. Obama handled the crisis compared to how Mr. McCain bungled it. I, as did the whole world, saw it for what it was and, without partisan spectacles on to screw up your vision, it became easy for me to see who may be able to best get us out of this mess.  One can hope, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

