<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trouble With Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:24:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blackoutyears</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422214</link>
		<dc:creator>blackoutyears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422214</guid>
		<description>@Rich -- She Who Must Not Be Named was actually a swipe at the OTT anti-Palinites (I consider myself moderate in that regard despite my antipathy). Thanks for leading with medulla though. Cumstain? Nice. 

Question is, while Palin may be a better VP than President Cumstain would be a POTUS (limited damage and all that), does anyone think Palin would be a better POTUS? Double dog dare!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rich &#8212; She Who Must Not Be Named was actually a swipe at the OTT anti-Palinites (I consider myself moderate in that regard despite my antipathy). Thanks for leading with medulla though. Cumstain? Nice. </p>
<p>Question is, while Palin may be a better VP than President Cumstain would be a POTUS (limited damage and all that), does anyone think Palin would be a better POTUS? Double dog dare!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noc</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422168</link>
		<dc:creator>Noc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 02:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422168</guid>
		<description>I have tremendous respect for Andrew Bacevich. That man knows what is going on.

I think it is inevitable that the next president will not bring as much change as we hope. Much of the damage is structural weakness that has been exacerbated by 8 years of bush.

However, as you mentioned yourself, Obama is the better change. Lets start the slow process of putting this country back together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tremendous respect for Andrew Bacevich. That man knows what is going on.</p>
<p>I think it is inevitable that the next president will not bring as much change as we hope. Much of the damage is structural weakness that has been exacerbated by 8 years of bush.</p>
<p>However, as you mentioned yourself, Obama is the better change. Lets start the slow process of putting this country back together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422113</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422113</guid>
		<description>Disagree Alan,

A couple of examples of what Bush was able to achieve with a bit of balls: 1. Persuaded the country to start a war when there really was no compelling reason to 2. Placed the office of President in as powerful a position as it has ever been

If he wins, Obama will pretty much be able to do whatever he wants for the first couple of years.

cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disagree Alan,</p>
<p>A couple of examples of what Bush was able to achieve with a bit of balls: 1. Persuaded the country to start a war when there really was no compelling reason to 2. Placed the office of President in as powerful a position as it has ever been</p>
<p>If he wins, Obama will pretty much be able to do whatever he wants for the first couple of years.</p>
<p>cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422108</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422108</guid>
		<description>Jimmy,
You need to wipe your chin now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy,<br />
You need to wipe your chin now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422105</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:44:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422105</guid>
		<description>&quot;She Who Must....&quot; - are you frickin&#039; serious?!?

She&#039;ll be a better VP than Hillary Cumstain would&#039;ve been as prez...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;She Who Must&#8230;.&#8221; &#8211; are you frickin&#8217; serious?!?</p>
<p>She&#8217;ll be a better VP than Hillary Cumstain would&#8217;ve been as prez&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422104</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422104</guid>
		<description>Barack Obama is going to win this election because of his eloquence, charm, charisma, and his appeal to your emotions.  If he can maintain that, and his friends in the media can successfully convince Americans that things are generally better or positive, then he &lt;em&gt;doesn&#039;t need&lt;/em&gt; to change anything of significance, or fulfil any of his campaign promises. 

 If he continues to make Americans feel good, he will be fine.  He could adopt a completely republican agenda and he could convince everybody its the right thing to do by smiling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is going to win this election because of his eloquence, charm, charisma, and his appeal to your emotions.  If he can maintain that, and his friends in the media can successfully convince Americans that things are generally better or positive, then he <em>doesn&#8217;t need</em> to change anything of significance, or fulfil any of his campaign promises. </p>
<p> If he continues to make Americans feel good, he will be fine.  He could adopt a completely republican agenda and he could convince everybody its the right thing to do by smiling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blackoutyears</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/10/30/the-trouble-with-change/comment-page-1/#comment-422103</link>
		<dc:creator>blackoutyears</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10023#comment-422103</guid>
		<description>I suppose, considering the tone of this particular campaign, that this message bears repeating. And yeah, take solace in the fact that both of these men likely can&#039;t help but be an improvement over the current POTUS. I certainly don&#039;t count myself among those Obama supporters who cower in fear at the idea of President McCain. And my support for Obama would that much more conflicted if we were contemplating Vice President Romney/Ridge/Lieberman rather than She Who Must Not Be Named.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose, considering the tone of this particular campaign, that this message bears repeating. And yeah, take solace in the fact that both of these men likely can&#8217;t help but be an improvement over the current POTUS. I certainly don&#8217;t count myself among those Obama supporters who cower in fear at the idea of President McCain. And my support for Obama would that much more conflicted if we were contemplating Vice President Romney/Ridge/Lieberman rather than She Who Must Not Be Named.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
