Georgia Republicans Expect Senate Runoff

By Doug Mataconis | Related entries in 2008 Election, Democrats, General Politics, Republicans, Senate

The final results aren’t in yet, but Georgia Republicans are apparently expecting a runoff in the Senate race there:

Georgia GOP Chairwoman Sue Everhart said Wednesday morning that she anticipated a runoff between Republican Saxby Chambliss and Democrat Jim Martin for the U.S. Senate seat in Georgia.

Neither candidate had 50 percent of the vote. Chambliss, the incumbent, held a 49.9 percent to 46.7 percent advantage over Martin with 96 percent of the state precincts counted, according to the Georgia Secretary of State’s Office as of 9:45 a.m. Wednesday. Libertarian Allen Buckley had 3.4 percent of the vote.

If that scenario held, Chambliss would face a costly and unpredictable four-week runoff with Martin.

Everhart said she was up early Wednesday morning talking to party leaders on the plan to keep Chambliss in the U.S. Senate.

Everhart said she thought a runoff might be possible months ago, based on the presence of Libertarian candidate Allen Buckley. She also believed Democratic turnout would be high because of the historic nature of Barack Obama’s candidacy. Obama was the first African-American candidate to win a major party nomination.

Election officials and reporters were trying to figure out on Wednesday how many votes remained to be counted.

The official count from the Georgia Secretary of State shows Chambliss leading, but with less than 50% of the vote, with 96% of the precincts reporting:

Georgia Senate 2

If that holds, Chambliss will face Martin in a December runoff.


This entry was posted on Wednesday, November 5th, 2008 and is filed under 2008 Election, Democrats, General Politics, Republicans, Senate. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Georgia Republicans Expect Senate Runoff”

  1. Agnostick Says:

    Wow. Sssooooooooo…

    1) A zillion more ballots to be printed

    2) Hundreds, if not thousands of polling places to be re-staffed and re-opened

    3) … and in the end, a voter turnout for the runoff that will probably be a thin sliver of yesterday’s number.

    This is yet another strong case for IRV.

    When will we learn?

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: