<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin Fights Back Against Smears</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:35:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424114</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424114</guid>
		<description>They have no idea who is actually saying these things it is all secret!! And I think for the media to do these stories Fox, MSNBC, CNN is an outrage.. how can you confirm or rebutt the facts if the person is cowardly and not standing  up for all the stuff they are putting out there!! Where is it coming from.. I doubt these stories and I think the media SHOULDN&#039;T do them  unless they have some papertrails to back up this garbage!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have no idea who is actually saying these things it is all secret!! And I think for the media to do these stories Fox, MSNBC, CNN is an outrage.. how can you confirm or rebutt the facts if the person is cowardly and not standing  up for all the stuff they are putting out there!! Where is it coming from.. I doubt these stories and I think the media SHOULDN&#8217;T do them  unless they have some papertrails to back up this garbage!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Mauer</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424109</link>
		<dc:creator>George Mauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424109</guid>
		<description>on2u: That&#039;s because those issues have actually been addressed by all the factcheckers and they&#039;re (mostly) false.  Seriously.  Stop trusting chain emails.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on2u: That&#8217;s because those issues have actually been addressed by all the factcheckers and they&#8217;re (mostly) false.  Seriously.  Stop trusting chain emails.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steeeve</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424105</link>
		<dc:creator>steeeve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424105</guid>
		<description>lol dontcha just hate them darn washington insider champaign drankin&#039; moderates! They really ruffle some feathers!  *cough*

I have to agree with the mean girl theory Bambi. She reminds me of every mean-spirited $#@!% you would see in the crappy movies about highschool. The kind of person that was spoiled and grew up being popular and wanted to tear apart anyone who disagreed with or challenged her. The whole beauty queen thing just reinforces it too.. 

Now that shes been rejected by the american electorate, in her latest interview there is a special quality in the tone of her voice. Sort of like in the end of those crappy teen movies when the ugly girl gets revenge on the &amp;$#%! and makes her cry.

I felt kind of bad for McCain after seeing his concession speech.. but i dont feel the least bit of sympathy for her after all those horrible speeches she made.. Karma baby!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol dontcha just hate them darn washington insider champaign drankin&#8217; moderates! They really ruffle some feathers!  *cough*</p>
<p>I have to agree with the mean girl theory Bambi. She reminds me of every mean-spirited $#@!% you would see in the crappy movies about highschool. The kind of person that was spoiled and grew up being popular and wanted to tear apart anyone who disagreed with or challenged her. The whole beauty queen thing just reinforces it too.. </p>
<p>Now that shes been rejected by the american electorate, in her latest interview there is a special quality in the tone of her voice. Sort of like in the end of those crappy teen movies when the ugly girl gets revenge on the &amp;$#%! and makes her cry.</p>
<p>I felt kind of bad for McCain after seeing his concession speech.. but i dont feel the least bit of sympathy for her after all those horrible speeches she made.. Karma baby!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: movie fan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424085</link>
		<dc:creator>movie fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 07:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424085</guid>
		<description>If Palin runs for President in 2012, at least she has name recognition going for her... but that may not work in her favor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Palin runs for President in 2012, at least she has name recognition going for her&#8230; but that may not work in her favor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jones</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424054</link>
		<dc:creator>Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424054</guid>
		<description>Given she couldn&#039;t even name a newspaper, and in light of all the other borderline retard behaviour and statements, I think on the balance of probability all the negative stuff is true.  I think you overestimate the skill and knowledge necessary to become an elected official.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given she couldn&#8217;t even name a newspaper, and in light of all the other borderline retard behaviour and statements, I think on the balance of probability all the negative stuff is true.  I think you overestimate the skill and knowledge necessary to become an elected official.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424052</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424052</guid>
		<description>The McCain Staff is in cya mode for losing the election.  They are using Mrs. Palin as a scape goat.  She is a serious threat to the Washington insider, champaign drinking, moderates.  A real conservative and she will live to fight another day (2 years from now) when the real conservatives rise and sweep the house and senate after the Barack debacle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The McCain Staff is in cya mode for losing the election.  They are using Mrs. Palin as a scape goat.  She is a serious threat to the Washington insider, champaign drinking, moderates.  A real conservative and she will live to fight another day (2 years from now) when the real conservatives rise and sweep the house and senate after the Barack debacle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: weemaryanne</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424022</link>
		<dc:creator>weemaryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424022</guid>
		<description>The &quot;But she&#039;s not THAT dumb&quot; defense doesn&#039;t work in view of some of the genuinely dumb things she has said.

Sorry.  But not very.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;But she&#8217;s not THAT dumb&#8221; defense doesn&#8217;t work in view of some of the genuinely dumb things she has said.</p>
<p>Sorry.  But not very.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424011</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424011</guid>
		<description>Nah, she really is that dumb.  

And she&#039;s done for.  The wingnuts will tout her for a while but four years from now they are going to want to get back a little real power.  They won&#039;t go with so tarnished a brand. This is just huffing and puffing on their part.  Down deep they know she&#039;s a loser.  

The only way we hear from her four years from now is if the GOP is still deep in the middle of their civil war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, she really is that dumb.  </p>
<p>And she&#8217;s done for.  The wingnuts will tout her for a while but four years from now they are going to want to get back a little real power.  They won&#8217;t go with so tarnished a brand. This is just huffing and puffing on their part.  Down deep they know she&#8217;s a loser.  </p>
<p>The only way we hear from her four years from now is if the GOP is still deep in the middle of their civil war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bambi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424010</link>
		<dc:creator>Bambi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424010</guid>
		<description>There isn&#039;t much strategic merit in these smears, whether true or false.  

The people who don&#039;t support Palin long ago pegged her for a dummy and don&#039;t need further proof of this.

The people supporting Palin because she&#039;s a) &quot;just like me,&quot; b) a righteous Christian warrior on a mission or c) a hot conservative babe aren&#039;t going to care whether or not she knows anything about geography, politics, history, economics, grammar, current events, legislation, civics or other such niceties.  Nor are they going to be anything but titillated by the towel rumor.
Again, the dominatrix boots and red leather jacket she wore in public already told the same story irrefutably.

I see only two reasons why the McCain camp are launching these smears.  The first possibility is that theyâ€™re trying to drum up sympathy for her.  Even Hard-as-Nails Hillary scored points when it looked like the Big Boys were picking on her, so this would work even better for Palin, who, in addition to being a scorned woman, will also be perceived as a persecuted Christian and shunned â€œoutsider.â€  Millionaire McCain, an old man with dubious Christian credentials, casts himself as the perfect villain if this is his intention.

The other is that Palin is deeply disliked by her staffers, who recognize that in this, the internet age, rumors that previously would have been ignored or buried by the media can gain serious traction and really hurt someone.  If the someone itâ€™s hurting is a self-important, verbally abusive and stupid person whose lack of qualifications for high office is even more apparent to those behind the scenes, then why not trash her? 

Admittedly, this is mostly a gut-level assessment based on the first time I saw this woman speak and she set off all of my &quot;mean girl&quot; alarms (I attended a private girls&#039; school for six years, nuff said).

But also, notice her interesting quote: â€œSo if it came from one of those debate preppers, you know, thatâ€™s curious.â€  Subtext: â€œI know you &amp;#!$ debate preppers are behind this and Iâ€™m going to get you treacherous elitist SOBâ€™s!â€

Notice also how none of the staffers are coming forward in person to deny the rumors and furthermore inform everyone that Palin comported herself with grace under pressure  and an appreciation of the people serving her.

So the storyâ€™s not really the smears, itâ€™s the reason theyâ€™re circulating, and how long  theyâ€™re allowed to live before someone from the McCain camp lays them to rest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t much strategic merit in these smears, whether true or false.  </p>
<p>The people who don&#8217;t support Palin long ago pegged her for a dummy and don&#8217;t need further proof of this.</p>
<p>The people supporting Palin because she&#8217;s a) &#8220;just like me,&#8221; b) a righteous Christian warrior on a mission or c) a hot conservative babe aren&#8217;t going to care whether or not she knows anything about geography, politics, history, economics, grammar, current events, legislation, civics or other such niceties.  Nor are they going to be anything but titillated by the towel rumor.<br />
Again, the dominatrix boots and red leather jacket she wore in public already told the same story irrefutably.</p>
<p>I see only two reasons why the McCain camp are launching these smears.  The first possibility is that theyâ€™re trying to drum up sympathy for her.  Even Hard-as-Nails Hillary scored points when it looked like the Big Boys were picking on her, so this would work even better for Palin, who, in addition to being a scorned woman, will also be perceived as a persecuted Christian and shunned â€œoutsider.â€  Millionaire McCain, an old man with dubious Christian credentials, casts himself as the perfect villain if this is his intention.</p>
<p>The other is that Palin is deeply disliked by her staffers, who recognize that in this, the internet age, rumors that previously would have been ignored or buried by the media can gain serious traction and really hurt someone.  If the someone itâ€™s hurting is a self-important, verbally abusive and stupid person whose lack of qualifications for high office is even more apparent to those behind the scenes, then why not trash her? </p>
<p>Admittedly, this is mostly a gut-level assessment based on the first time I saw this woman speak and she set off all of my &#8220;mean girl&#8221; alarms (I attended a private girls&#8217; school for six years, nuff said).</p>
<p>But also, notice her interesting quote: â€œSo if it came from one of those debate preppers, you know, thatâ€™s curious.â€  Subtext: â€œI know you &amp;#!$ debate preppers are behind this and Iâ€™m going to get you treacherous elitist SOBâ€™s!â€</p>
<p>Notice also how none of the staffers are coming forward in person to deny the rumors and furthermore inform everyone that Palin comported herself with grace under pressure  and an appreciation of the people serving her.</p>
<p>So the storyâ€™s not really the smears, itâ€™s the reason theyâ€™re circulating, and how long  theyâ€™re allowed to live before someone from the McCain camp lays them to rest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruffis</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424008</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruffis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:24:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424008</guid>
		<description>Ms. Palin said. &quot;Those were taken out of context and that&#039;s cruel and it&#039;s mean-spirited, it&#039;s immature, it&#039;s unprofessional, and those guys are jerks, if they came away with it taking things out of context and then tried to spread something on national news. It is not fair and not right.&quot;


Does anyone else see the hypocrisy here?
Am I alone in thinking she does not know who is in NAFTA, she does not know Africa is not a country and she has no clue how ironic what she just said is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ms. Palin said. &#8220;Those were taken out of context and that&#8217;s cruel and it&#8217;s mean-spirited, it&#8217;s immature, it&#8217;s unprofessional, and those guys are jerks, if they came away with it taking things out of context and then tried to spread something on national news. It is not fair and not right.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does anyone else see the hypocrisy here?<br />
Am I alone in thinking she does not know who is in NAFTA, she does not know Africa is not a country and she has no clue how ironic what she just said is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424007</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424007</guid>
		<description>On the Africa and NAFTA thing: did you hear the prank interview?  She believed &quot;Sarkozy&quot; when he said he could see Belgium from his house.  She didn&#039;t know the name of Canada&#039;s prime minister.  Even if you argue that France and Belgium are unimportant countries, surely she should know something about Canada -- after all, you can only see one island of Russia from one island of Alaska, but Alaska and Canada share a rather long border.

So her ignorance of what &quot;Africa&quot; is may be surprising but not any more surprising than what she has already displayed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the Africa and NAFTA thing: did you hear the prank interview?  She believed &#8220;Sarkozy&#8221; when he said he could see Belgium from his house.  She didn&#8217;t know the name of Canada&#8217;s prime minister.  Even if you argue that France and Belgium are unimportant countries, surely she should know something about Canada &#8212; after all, you can only see one island of Russia from one island of Alaska, but Alaska and Canada share a rather long border.</p>
<p>So her ignorance of what &#8220;Africa&#8221; is may be surprising but not any more surprising than what she has already displayed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dollface</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-424002</link>
		<dc:creator>Dollface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-424002</guid>
		<description>I just wrote about this on my own blog.  Personally I don&#039;t care anymore about how much she spent on clothing or whether she greeted McCain aides in a towel.  We should let her return to Alaska in peace and cross our fingers she doesn&#039;t run in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wrote about this on my own blog.  Personally I don&#8217;t care anymore about how much she spent on clothing or whether she greeted McCain aides in a towel.  We should let her return to Alaska in peace and cross our fingers she doesn&#8217;t run in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: on2u</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-423998</link>
		<dc:creator>on2u</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-423998</guid>
		<description>Sarah Palin is a force to be reckoned with. She is what will help the Republicans if they wish to be part of mainstream. Of course they attacked her on every front. She was a serious threat. 
To counteract all the negativism, has anyone bothered to ask about how much the obama&#039;s pay for their clothes? Obama does not know how many States  there are? Biden: A little confused on branches of Gov&#039;t. How about the $460 tab for room service by Mrs Obama at the waldorf Astoria. The list goes on and on. But we cannot touch them. The media protects and dismisses all negativism against them based on their sensitivity to public scrutiny??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is a force to be reckoned with. She is what will help the Republicans if they wish to be part of mainstream. Of course they attacked her on every front. She was a serious threat.<br />
To counteract all the negativism, has anyone bothered to ask about how much the obama&#8217;s pay for their clothes? Obama does not know how many States  there are? Biden: A little confused on branches of Gov&#8217;t. How about the $460 tab for room service by Mrs Obama at the waldorf Astoria. The list goes on and on. But we cannot touch them. The media protects and dismisses all negativism against them based on their sensitivity to public scrutiny??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/08/palin-fights-back-against-smears/comment-page-1/#comment-423997</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 16:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10753#comment-423997</guid>
		<description>On the whole NAFTA thing, I would really love to know whether Palin a) didn&#039;t know that Canada and Mexico were in NAFTA with the US, or b) was simply unsure whether any other countries might be in NAFTA as well.  The former would reflect massive ignorance; the latter would merely indicate that she was unsure on what would be minor details.

I suspect that, of the smears that actually have any basis, many of them will turn out to be careful cherry-picking of factoids out of context.  And most of them will turn out to be complete fabrications.  And I say all this as someone who considered her selection a significant reason to vote against McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the whole NAFTA thing, I would really love to know whether Palin a) didn&#8217;t know that Canada and Mexico were in NAFTA with the US, or b) was simply unsure whether any other countries might be in NAFTA as well.  The former would reflect massive ignorance; the latter would merely indicate that she was unsure on what would be minor details.</p>
<p>I suspect that, of the smears that actually have any basis, many of them will turn out to be careful cherry-picking of factoids out of context.  And most of them will turn out to be complete fabrications.  And I say all this as someone who considered her selection a significant reason to vote against McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
