<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s Wrong With The GOP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2010 &#38; 2012 Election Prologue</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-424716</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 2010 &#38; 2012 Election Prologue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10792#comment-424716</guid>
		<description>[...] post-mortems and navel gazing are the order of the day. It&#8217;s a good thing. Nick, Justin, Doug and Alan have already weighed in. I&#8217;ll add my thoughts in a future post, but first need to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post-mortems and navel gazing are the order of the day. It&#8217;s a good thing. Nick, Justin, Doug and Alan have already weighed in. I&#8217;ll add my thoughts in a future post, but first need to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Dwivedi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-424240</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Dwivedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 22:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10792#comment-424240</guid>
		<description>I think Obama won the election because he never attacked the Republicans or even the GOP.  He did not even attack Pres. Bush or Sen. McCain as people, but targeted their policies, which were there for all to see.

Thus his appeal was beyond one&#039;s party affiliation.  He focused on the issues and that made sense to voters, who could see in black and white this time.

He was also more in touch with the reality of the demographics.  Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin were targeting a narrow, and rapidly shrinking base.  They also never got their issues right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Obama won the election because he never attacked the Republicans or even the GOP.  He did not even attack Pres. Bush or Sen. McCain as people, but targeted their policies, which were there for all to see.</p>
<p>Thus his appeal was beyond one&#8217;s party affiliation.  He focused on the issues and that made sense to voters, who could see in black and white this time.</p>
<p>He was also more in touch with the reality of the demographics.  Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin were targeting a narrow, and rapidly shrinking base.  They also never got their issues right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: batman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-424170</link>
		<dc:creator>batman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10792#comment-424170</guid>
		<description>Yeah, sure.  Schmidt, McCain&#039;s campaign manager is going to tell us what&#039;s wrong with the GOP.  The GOP might as well heed advice from the Democrats themselves.  

Firstly, McCain-Feingold.  After that fine piece of legislation, it would no longer be possible to finance a campaign as Ronald Reagan&#039;s was financed.  You either have to be independently wealthy like a John McCain, or have help from those like George Soros, et al.

Then, there are 3 basic problems.  Firstly, the GOP fails to articulate free-standing platforms.  They actually have many, yet fail to articulate a single clear vision.  The GOP has fallen back into fabricating reactionary platforms,  basing them on what it&#039;s against.  It hasn&#039;t articulated a clear vision of what it is for, since Ronald Reagan; And, before that, perhaps Abraham Lincoln.  The &#039;crats have had no such problem in this last election.  Ask any pre-schooler what Obama stood for, and he would say &quot;Change.&quot;  The 2nd problem and 3rd problems are the campaigns and the candidates the GOP runs:  Like selecting followers, instead of leaders.  Like, running maverick Republican-in-name-onlys, like &quot;maverick&quot; candidates like John McCain, who wind up at the final hours, spending way too much time trying cement his own party base. John McCain is no &quot;full flavored&quot; conservative.  Last week, conservatives had to drag themselves into the polls, and hold their noses as they voted for McCain.  The remote glimmer of hope with the ticket was Sarah.  Those that made it to the polls, rationalized it by voting for Sarah.  Perhaps if Sarah Palin had the top billing, a true conservative,  facing off against Hillary, their would have been a contest. The problem is, that in &quot;playing for the center&quot; that the GOP doesn&#039;t stand for anything anymore. They&#039;re getting hard to distinguish from Democrats.  They appear. to Joe America:  To be just in it for the power. .  As the Democrats moved further left from socialism to fascist Marxism, the GOP has had this odd problem of &quot;following,&quot;  leaning leftward to fill in the space.  &quot;Reaching across the aisle&quot; far too much.  From &quot;A kindler, gentler nation..&quot; To &quot;Read my lips, no new taxes.&quot;  To: McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy.  Did McCain co-sponsor any legislation with a fellow Republican?  When the Republicans controlled congress, they spent money like Democrats. Played golf with them, etc.  Ran cover for them, etc.  See Fannie and Freddie.

George Bush Sr was elected only because of Ronald Reagan and his vision.  Reagan selected Bush only to appear &quot;more centrist.&quot;  Bush Sr. was bureaucrat. A Republican in name only, setting the stage for the next 20 years, of disassembling the party that Ronaldus Magnus built.  The lowest, low point, was the Republican latest Medicaid entitlement.  Or, was it the Wall Streel bail out fiasco?  Perhaps, this time, we can agree with the &#039;crats and say:  Yep, It&#039;s Bush&#039;s fault.

Ponder this:  If it weren&#039;t for the founder of the Republican party, and these Democrats had their way back at that time; Knowing that Democrats have always been very consistent, hence their party symbol; And Geo. Washington&#039;s observation of a profest Democrat:  There would have been no way for this nation to have a president-elect Obama today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, sure.  Schmidt, McCain&#8217;s campaign manager is going to tell us what&#8217;s wrong with the GOP.  The GOP might as well heed advice from the Democrats themselves.  </p>
<p>Firstly, McCain-Feingold.  After that fine piece of legislation, it would no longer be possible to finance a campaign as Ronald Reagan&#8217;s was financed.  You either have to be independently wealthy like a John McCain, or have help from those like George Soros, et al.</p>
<p>Then, there are 3 basic problems.  Firstly, the GOP fails to articulate free-standing platforms.  They actually have many, yet fail to articulate a single clear vision.  The GOP has fallen back into fabricating reactionary platforms,  basing them on what it&#8217;s against.  It hasn&#8217;t articulated a clear vision of what it is for, since Ronald Reagan; And, before that, perhaps Abraham Lincoln.  The &#8216;crats have had no such problem in this last election.  Ask any pre-schooler what Obama stood for, and he would say &#8220;Change.&#8221;  The 2nd problem and 3rd problems are the campaigns and the candidates the GOP runs:  Like selecting followers, instead of leaders.  Like, running maverick Republican-in-name-onlys, like &#8220;maverick&#8221; candidates like John McCain, who wind up at the final hours, spending way too much time trying cement his own party base. John McCain is no &#8220;full flavored&#8221; conservative.  Last week, conservatives had to drag themselves into the polls, and hold their noses as they voted for McCain.  The remote glimmer of hope with the ticket was Sarah.  Those that made it to the polls, rationalized it by voting for Sarah.  Perhaps if Sarah Palin had the top billing, a true conservative,  facing off against Hillary, their would have been a contest. The problem is, that in &#8220;playing for the center&#8221; that the GOP doesn&#8217;t stand for anything anymore. They&#8217;re getting hard to distinguish from Democrats.  They appear. to Joe America:  To be just in it for the power. .  As the Democrats moved further left from socialism to fascist Marxism, the GOP has had this odd problem of &#8220;following,&#8221;  leaning leftward to fill in the space.  &#8220;Reaching across the aisle&#8221; far too much.  From &#8220;A kindler, gentler nation..&#8221; To &#8220;Read my lips, no new taxes.&#8221;  To: McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy.  Did McCain co-sponsor any legislation with a fellow Republican?  When the Republicans controlled congress, they spent money like Democrats. Played golf with them, etc.  Ran cover for them, etc.  See Fannie and Freddie.</p>
<p>George Bush Sr was elected only because of Ronald Reagan and his vision.  Reagan selected Bush only to appear &#8220;more centrist.&#8221;  Bush Sr. was bureaucrat. A Republican in name only, setting the stage for the next 20 years, of disassembling the party that Ronaldus Magnus built.  The lowest, low point, was the Republican latest Medicaid entitlement.  Or, was it the Wall Streel bail out fiasco?  Perhaps, this time, we can agree with the &#8216;crats and say:  Yep, It&#8217;s Bush&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>Ponder this:  If it weren&#8217;t for the founder of the Republican party, and these Democrats had their way back at that time; Knowing that Democrats have always been very consistent, hence their party symbol; And Geo. Washington&#8217;s observation of a profest Democrat:  There would have been no way for this nation to have a president-elect Obama today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-424159</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10792#comment-424159</guid>
		<description>Obama didn&#039;t win the election because he was center.  Anyone who has studied the man, his voting record, and his stated policies understands that he&#039;s anything but a centrist at heart.  Obama got elected because America can&#039;t stand George Bush and anything associated with him.  

Over the next two years, Obama has to prove that he can moderate his stance on his more left-leaning views and get America back on its feet financially.  If that doesn&#039;t happen, nothing else is really going to matter.  He&#039;s going to be the guy who promised to be the anti-Bush and to change America.  If he hasn&#039;t delivered on that promise, or at least laid believable groundwork for it, the Dems are going to start losing Congressional seats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama didn&#8217;t win the election because he was center.  Anyone who has studied the man, his voting record, and his stated policies understands that he&#8217;s anything but a centrist at heart.  Obama got elected because America can&#8217;t stand George Bush and anything associated with him.  </p>
<p>Over the next two years, Obama has to prove that he can moderate his stance on his more left-leaning views and get America back on its feet financially.  If that doesn&#8217;t happen, nothing else is really going to matter.  He&#8217;s going to be the guy who promised to be the anti-Bush and to change America.  If he hasn&#8217;t delivered on that promise, or at least laid believable groundwork for it, the Dems are going to start losing Congressional seats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-424133</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10792#comment-424133</guid>
		<description>So wait, he&#039;s admitting that the Republicans suck at everything that they try?  ...   Isn&#039;t that way we&#039;ve been saying for years? The republican party tries to govern based on their ideology.  That should have no place in the governing of a nation. The fact is they&#039;re wrong about so many things that their house of cards came crumbling down around their ears.
-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So wait, he&#8217;s admitting that the Republicans suck at everything that they try?  &#8230;   Isn&#8217;t that way we&#8217;ve been saying for years? The republican party tries to govern based on their ideology.  That should have no place in the governing of a nation. The fact is they&#8217;re wrong about so many things that their house of cards came crumbling down around their ears.<br />
-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scone</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/09/whats-wrong-with-the-gop/comment-page-1/#comment-424118</link>
		<dc:creator>scone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 19:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10792#comment-424118</guid>
		<description>The GOP will have a hard time moving to the center as long as the hierarchy is controlled by people of the most extreme far right tendencies. Palin is an example-- she&#039;s not a mainstream evangelical, she&#039;s associated with Dominionism, a group whose stated aims include the overthrow of the government, and the Constitution, and its replacement by a &quot;christian&quot; theocracy. Palin frightens the center, with good reason. 

The next few years are going to be a battle to the death within the GOP. Either the moderates will win, casting out the ultra-far right into the fringe parties, or the GOP will morph into something truly ugly. The worst case analysis is something almost unthinkable: a theocratic fascist party with a paramilitary backup derived from co-opted U.S. forces and Blackhawk mercenaries. It can&#039;t be allowed to happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP will have a hard time moving to the center as long as the hierarchy is controlled by people of the most extreme far right tendencies. Palin is an example&#8211; she&#8217;s not a mainstream evangelical, she&#8217;s associated with Dominionism, a group whose stated aims include the overthrow of the government, and the Constitution, and its replacement by a &#8220;christian&#8221; theocracy. Palin frightens the center, with good reason. </p>
<p>The next few years are going to be a battle to the death within the GOP. Either the moderates will win, casting out the ultra-far right into the fringe parties, or the GOP will morph into something truly ugly. The worst case analysis is something almost unthinkable: a theocratic fascist party with a paramilitary backup derived from co-opted U.S. forces and Blackhawk mercenaries. It can&#8217;t be allowed to happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
