<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FEC to Audit McCain but Not Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cookiegirl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-2/#comment-433479</link>
		<dc:creator>cookiegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-433479</guid>
		<description>I agree with what rob says. We can think all we want, but unfortunately we are not the ones deciding who gets to do what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with what rob says. We can think all we want, but unfortunately we are not the ones deciding who gets to do what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookiegirl</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-433477</link>
		<dc:creator>cookiegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-433477</guid>
		<description>Campaign finance reform is needed on all levels. But if I had to pick one person to receive an audit, I would pick the person who received the public money, because that is coming out of my pocket directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Campaign finance reform is needed on all levels. But if I had to pick one person to receive an audit, I would pick the person who received the public money, because that is coming out of my pocket directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424554</link>
		<dc:creator>rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424554</guid>
		<description>you guys can THINK there should be an audit, but that is not how it works.

I THINK McCain and his wife should have disclosed their tax returns, I THINK McCain should disclose how he vetted Palin.  That doesn&#039;t mean there is a mechanism for this to happen.


&lt;blockquote&gt;which is why Obama elected to not use public financing after he promised to do soâ€¦ snaky snake that he is!&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Please include a link where he promised to not use public funding.

&lt;blockquote&gt;wsosbor Says:
November 12th, 2008 at 11:33 am

I think that Obamaâ€™s tax plan will destroy the economy even further.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That carries about as much weight as me deciding what NASA&#039;s next mission should be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you guys can THINK there should be an audit, but that is not how it works.</p>
<p>I THINK McCain and his wife should have disclosed their tax returns, I THINK McCain should disclose how he vetted Palin.  That doesn&#8217;t mean there is a mechanism for this to happen.</p>
<blockquote><p>which is why Obama elected to not use public financing after he promised to do soâ€¦ snaky snake that he is!</p></blockquote>
<p>Please include a link where he promised to not use public funding.</p>
<blockquote><p>wsosbor Says:<br />
November 12th, 2008 at 11:33 am</p>
<p>I think that Obamaâ€™s tax plan will destroy the economy even further.
</p></blockquote>
<p>That carries about as much weight as me deciding what NASA&#8217;s next mission should be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wsosbor</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424520</link>
		<dc:creator>wsosbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424520</guid>
		<description>I think that Obama&#039;s tax plan will destroy the economy even further. The capital gains tax is unfair and will only push private investors out, therefore destroying the stock market.

It is quite evident that Obama didn&#039;t major in economics in college, much less even take an economic class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Obama&#8217;s tax plan will destroy the economy even further. The capital gains tax is unfair and will only push private investors out, therefore destroying the stock market.</p>
<p>It is quite evident that Obama didn&#8217;t major in economics in college, much less even take an economic class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wosbor</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424516</link>
		<dc:creator>wosbor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424516</guid>
		<description>I think that it is totally unfair how the press portrayed McCain during the election. They constantly looked over many subjects that rose serious questions about Obama&#039;s view, but instead focused on certain matters that are not important .. Like the price of the clothes that were spent. Barack spent 10 times as much on 30 minute comericals aired during prime time.

I believe that McCain was a victim of Liberal press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that it is totally unfair how the press portrayed McCain during the election. They constantly looked over many subjects that rose serious questions about Obama&#8217;s view, but instead focused on certain matters that are not important .. Like the price of the clothes that were spent. Barack spent 10 times as much on 30 minute comericals aired during prime time.</p>
<p>I believe that McCain was a victim of Liberal press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424495</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424495</guid>
		<description>hainan57 speculates: 


&lt;blockquote&gt;â€¦ and it isnâ€™t just foreign contributions itâ€™s the businesses, lobbyists , and other that SAID they were just plain simple people like yourself so they can get around the contribution limits, which is why Obama elected to not use public financing after he promised to do soâ€¦ snaky snake that he is!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Speculation.  Hearsay.  Rumormongering.

But yes, I agree, let&#039;s audit.  The millions spent on an audit would be worth it to prove you wrong, I think.  ;)

--Ag</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hainan57 speculates: </p>
<blockquote><p>â€¦ and it isnâ€™t just foreign contributions itâ€™s the businesses, lobbyists , and other that SAID they were just plain simple people like yourself so they can get around the contribution limits, which is why Obama elected to not use public financing after he promised to do soâ€¦ snaky snake that he is!</p></blockquote>
<p>Speculation.  Hearsay.  Rumormongering.</p>
<p>But yes, I agree, let&#8217;s audit.  The millions spent on an audit would be worth it to prove you wrong, I think.  ;)</p>
<p>&#8211;Ag</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hainan57</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424433</link>
		<dc:creator>hainan57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:45:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424433</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t about whether or not McCain won the election.... and it is not Republicans being whiny. It is an article that was written, and we are simply commenting that we think it seems unfair... and it isn&#039;t just foreign contributions it&#039;s the businesses, lobbyists , and other that SAID they were just plain simple people like yourself so they can get around the contribution limits, which is why Obama elected to not use public financing after he promised to do so... snaky snake that he is!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t about whether or not McCain won the election&#8230;. and it is not Republicans being whiny. It is an article that was written, and we are simply commenting that we think it seems unfair&#8230; and it isn&#8217;t just foreign contributions it&#8217;s the businesses, lobbyists , and other that SAID they were just plain simple people like yourself so they can get around the contribution limits, which is why Obama elected to not use public financing after he promised to do so&#8230; snaky snake that he is!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424411</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424411</guid>
		<description>Jeffrey W Says

&lt;blockquote cite&gt;Look, Iâ€™m not against McCain. I actually liked the guy a lot back when he was himself and wasnâ€™t trying to be something that appealed to the old, white, evangelical base. The McCain of the concession speech is a guy I could have voted for.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I couldn&#039;t have said it better, Jeffrey.

&lt;i&gt;That&lt;/i&gt; McCain would&#039;ve chosen Joe Lieberman as a running mate--not some Caribou Barbie that he only first met six months ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeffrey W Says</p>
<blockquote cite><p>Look, Iâ€™m not against McCain. I actually liked the guy a lot back when he was himself and wasnâ€™t trying to be something that appealed to the old, white, evangelical base. The McCain of the concession speech is a guy I could have voted for.</p></blockquote>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t have said it better, Jeffrey.</p>
<p><i>That</i> McCain would&#8217;ve chosen Joe Lieberman as a running mate&#8211;not some Caribou Barbie that he only first met six months ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424410</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424410</guid>
		<description>First of all, every campaign should have a least a small, low-scale audit.  It should be standard operating procedure.

Frankly, I&#039;d like to see Obama audited.  Somehow, I doubt there exists an adequate number of crows to stuff down the pie holes of all those screaming for this audit.

Who, exactly, is demanding this audit, anyway?

Perhaps the same folks that demanded a valid birth certificate?

Perhaps the same folks that denounced Obama as a Muslim?

Perhaps the same folks that said they had a tape of Michelle Obama ranting against &quot;Whitey?&quot;

Perhaps the same folks that said, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Look!  He doesn&#039;t put his hand over his heart when he should!  What a traitor!&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Perhaps the same folks that said, &lt;i&gt;&quot;His pastor said WHAT?!?!?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yeah.  Uh-huh.

Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, every campaign should have a least a small, low-scale audit.  It should be standard operating procedure.</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;d like to see Obama audited.  Somehow, I doubt there exists an adequate number of crows to stuff down the pie holes of all those screaming for this audit.</p>
<p>Who, exactly, is demanding this audit, anyway?</p>
<p>Perhaps the same folks that demanded a valid birth certificate?</p>
<p>Perhaps the same folks that denounced Obama as a Muslim?</p>
<p>Perhaps the same folks that said they had a tape of Michelle Obama ranting against &#8220;Whitey?&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps the same folks that said, <i>&#8220;Look!  He doesn&#8217;t put his hand over his heart when he should!  What a traitor!&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Perhaps the same folks that said, <i>&#8220;His pastor said WHAT?!?!?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Yeah.  Uh-huh.</p>
<p>Agnostick<br />
<a href="mailto:agnostick@excite.com">agnostick@excite.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike mcEachran</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424404</link>
		<dc:creator>mike mcEachran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 22:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424404</guid>
		<description>@ BJ, I meant shouldn&#039;t we want to know where private funds for a Presidential campaigns come from?  Perhaps I&#039;m following a Republican line of attack here (but to me this is not a partisan issue).  Shouldn&#039;t the funding of a Presidential election be completely transparent, both on the sourcing side and the spending side regardless of whether a candidate opts for public or private sources?  No brainer to me.  And to my mind, the sources of private funds should be under higher scrutiny, and the spending should be under no less scrutiny.  It&#039;s only the sanctity of our democracy that&#039;s at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ BJ, I meant shouldn&#8217;t we want to know where private funds for a Presidential campaigns come from?  Perhaps I&#8217;m following a Republican line of attack here (but to me this is not a partisan issue).  Shouldn&#8217;t the funding of a Presidential election be completely transparent, both on the sourcing side and the spending side regardless of whether a candidate opts for public or private sources?  No brainer to me.  And to my mind, the sources of private funds should be under higher scrutiny, and the spending should be under no less scrutiny.  It&#8217;s only the sanctity of our democracy that&#8217;s at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey W</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424398</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure why folks are blaming Obama for this.  These are the rules, and they were passed by a bipartisan vote.  Nobody likes being audited - it&#039;s time consuming and expensive, and if the agreed-upon rules end up saying Obama doesn&#039;t have to be audited, then that&#039;s how it goes.  That&#039;s not Obama&#039;s fault.

I guess I find it a bit disingenuous for Republicans to be complaining about this.  McCain was the co-sponsor of the McCain-Feingold Act, and if he felt that this system was unfair he ought to have changed it when he wrote that act.

Look guys, the time to game the referees is over.  Let&#039;s assume your crazy theories are right and $12 million bucks were donated by foreigners.  Well, that&#039;s only 2% of the money he raised.  Regular Americans donated the vast majority of his campaign money, and even if the out-there theories are right, the truth is that the overwhelming majority of his money was given by ordinary Americans like myself.

Regardless of any small irregularities, Obama simply out-raised McCain.   The Republicans in prior years have never seemed to have a problem with outspending Democrats, so please don&#039;t feign offense now.

Your candidate ran a poor campaign and had a vague and rapidly changing message.  He lost because he was the worse candidate.  Folks are tired of scare tactics and rumor mongering and red-baiting and personal attacks.  People want hope for the future and leadership, not innuendo and McCarthyism.  The GOP lost because its message is narrow, divisive, and out of touch.  The sooner you guys realize that the sooner you can start winning elections again.

Look, I&#039;m not against McCain.  I actually liked the guy a lot back when he was himself and wasn&#039;t trying to be something that appealed to the old, white, evangelical base.  The McCain of the concession speech is a guy I could have voted for.

But here&#039;s the reality.  The GOP is now the party of old white Southern men.  It needs to change that.  It needs to start being inclusive of Latinos (stop already with the immigration hate), Blacks, Gays (yep), the poor, the middle class, people who aren&#039;t zealots, and women.  Until you kick the Sarah Palins and the Jerry Falwells of the world out of your party (or at least shut them up) you&#039;re going to be the minority.

So anyway, stop making this out to be an Obama thing.  If you don&#039;t like the way the campaign finance laws work, talk to McCain about it.  But what you really ought to do is take a long hard look in the mirror and figure out how the GOP can be representative of the America of today again.  I personally hope it can be, as I think it&#039;s important to have both sides equally represented and I think the GOP can have a lot to offer once it gets rid of the idiots that are currently running it (and the fringe groups that currently support it).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure why folks are blaming Obama for this.  These are the rules, and they were passed by a bipartisan vote.  Nobody likes being audited &#8211; it&#8217;s time consuming and expensive, and if the agreed-upon rules end up saying Obama doesn&#8217;t have to be audited, then that&#8217;s how it goes.  That&#8217;s not Obama&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>I guess I find it a bit disingenuous for Republicans to be complaining about this.  McCain was the co-sponsor of the McCain-Feingold Act, and if he felt that this system was unfair he ought to have changed it when he wrote that act.</p>
<p>Look guys, the time to game the referees is over.  Let&#8217;s assume your crazy theories are right and $12 million bucks were donated by foreigners.  Well, that&#8217;s only 2% of the money he raised.  Regular Americans donated the vast majority of his campaign money, and even if the out-there theories are right, the truth is that the overwhelming majority of his money was given by ordinary Americans like myself.</p>
<p>Regardless of any small irregularities, Obama simply out-raised McCain.   The Republicans in prior years have never seemed to have a problem with outspending Democrats, so please don&#8217;t feign offense now.</p>
<p>Your candidate ran a poor campaign and had a vague and rapidly changing message.  He lost because he was the worse candidate.  Folks are tired of scare tactics and rumor mongering and red-baiting and personal attacks.  People want hope for the future and leadership, not innuendo and McCarthyism.  The GOP lost because its message is narrow, divisive, and out of touch.  The sooner you guys realize that the sooner you can start winning elections again.</p>
<p>Look, I&#8217;m not against McCain.  I actually liked the guy a lot back when he was himself and wasn&#8217;t trying to be something that appealed to the old, white, evangelical base.  The McCain of the concession speech is a guy I could have voted for.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the reality.  The GOP is now the party of old white Southern men.  It needs to change that.  It needs to start being inclusive of Latinos (stop already with the immigration hate), Blacks, Gays (yep), the poor, the middle class, people who aren&#8217;t zealots, and women.  Until you kick the Sarah Palins and the Jerry Falwells of the world out of your party (or at least shut them up) you&#8217;re going to be the minority.</p>
<p>So anyway, stop making this out to be an Obama thing.  If you don&#8217;t like the way the campaign finance laws work, talk to McCain about it.  But what you really ought to do is take a long hard look in the mirror and figure out how the GOP can be representative of the America of today again.  I personally hope it can be, as I think it&#8217;s important to have both sides equally represented and I think the GOP can have a lot to offer once it gets rid of the idiots that are currently running it (and the fringe groups that currently support it).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424396</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424396</guid>
		<description>Once again, McCain is the victim of his bad legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, McCain is the victim of his bad legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424395</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 20:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424395</guid>
		<description>Hmmm....part of campaign finance oversight is where money comes from and where money goes.  Anything wrong with automatically auditing both campaigns after a Presidential run, regardless of public or private funding?  To think otherwise smacks of letting ideology cloud common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;.part of campaign finance oversight is where money comes from and where money goes.  Anything wrong with automatically auditing both campaigns after a Presidential run, regardless of public or private funding?  To think otherwise smacks of letting ideology cloud common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike A.</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424393</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424393</guid>
		<description>So, in other words, Obama is a genius tactician.  
Good news for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, in other words, Obama is a genius tactician.<br />
Good news for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Aman</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424383</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Aman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424383</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m inclined to agree with the previous commenters.  This doesn&#039;t seem right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m inclined to agree with the previous commenters.  This doesn&#8217;t seem right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424381</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424381</guid>
		<description>How stupid is it to allow Wall Street to police itself?  Pretty stupid, right?

Well, our election system has politicians police themselves.  How is that not equally stupid?  Actually, how is that not MORE stupid because there is no potential oversight?

Ed, is there any law the Democrats could break that you WOULD get mad about?  If not you are no democrat (notice the lower cass &quot;d&quot;.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How stupid is it to allow Wall Street to police itself?  Pretty stupid, right?</p>
<p>Well, our election system has politicians police themselves.  How is that not equally stupid?  Actually, how is that not MORE stupid because there is no potential oversight?</p>
<p>Ed, is there any law the Democrats could break that you WOULD get mad about?  If not you are no democrat (notice the lower cass &#8220;d&#8221;.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424380</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424380</guid>
		<description>Suck on it Republicans. 

When Democrats use the rules to wipe the floor with you, you cry foul.  If Republicans do it, it&#039;s good politics.  That&#039;s why you lost.  Always crying about how unfair everything is.  Most people realize it&#039;s the Republicans that are the crooked ones, so that&#039;s why you are in the political wilderness.

John McCain sought public financing in the primaries, secured a loan to resuscitate his losing campaign using that as collateral, and then illegally opted out of the public financing.  The only reason he was able to finance his primary campaign with all those donor contributions is because the Bushies refused to properly staff the FEC so that the complaints could be addressed.  So I don&#039;t want to hear anyone imply that Obama did anything wrong because he&#039;s not being audited, when there is proof that McCain illegally financed his campaign.

But in the Republican world, suggesting impropriety against an opponent carries more weight than actual impropriety by their own party.

This public/private financing of the presidential campaigns faux outrage was a losing issue during the race, and it continues to be one for you now.  Seek your campaign finance reform, but maybe this time have someone other than McCain sponsor it, since he has a problem actually supporting any of his &quot;reforms&quot; such as this or his immigration reform if it&#039;s not politically expedient.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Suck on it Republicans. </p>
<p>When Democrats use the rules to wipe the floor with you, you cry foul.  If Republicans do it, it&#8217;s good politics.  That&#8217;s why you lost.  Always crying about how unfair everything is.  Most people realize it&#8217;s the Republicans that are the crooked ones, so that&#8217;s why you are in the political wilderness.</p>
<p>John McCain sought public financing in the primaries, secured a loan to resuscitate his losing campaign using that as collateral, and then illegally opted out of the public financing.  The only reason he was able to finance his primary campaign with all those donor contributions is because the Bushies refused to properly staff the FEC so that the complaints could be addressed.  So I don&#8217;t want to hear anyone imply that Obama did anything wrong because he&#8217;s not being audited, when there is proof that McCain illegally financed his campaign.</p>
<p>But in the Republican world, suggesting impropriety against an opponent carries more weight than actual impropriety by their own party.</p>
<p>This public/private financing of the presidential campaigns faux outrage was a losing issue during the race, and it continues to be one for you now.  Seek your campaign finance reform, but maybe this time have someone other than McCain sponsor it, since he has a problem actually supporting any of his &#8220;reforms&#8221; such as this or his immigration reform if it&#8217;s not politically expedient.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Bjornson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424379</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Bjornson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424379</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Shouldnâ€™t we want to know more about private funds than public ones?&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;d say no.  Taxpayers deserve to know how their money is being spent, which is why oversight in government, and organizations the government funds, is so important.  On the private side, it is up to the people who are directly funding the entity to demand oversight.

That said, given the amount of money involved, and Obama&#039;s promise of a more open and accountable way of doing business, his books should definitely be audited as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Shouldnâ€™t we want to know more about private funds than public ones?</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;d say no.  Taxpayers deserve to know how their money is being spent, which is why oversight in government, and organizations the government funds, is so important.  On the private side, it is up to the people who are directly funding the entity to demand oversight.</p>
<p>That said, given the amount of money involved, and Obama&#8217;s promise of a more open and accountable way of doing business, his books should definitely be audited as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424378</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424378</guid>
		<description>Yep, this sounds about right.  Pretty unbelievable, but not really surprising when you consider all of the other Obama questions that have been swept under the rug.  I guess that&#039;s what McCain gets for not going &#039;maverick&#039; on his funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, this sounds about right.  Pretty unbelievable, but not really surprising when you consider all of the other Obama questions that have been swept under the rug.  I guess that&#8217;s what McCain gets for not going &#8216;maverick&#8217; on his funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/11/fec-to-audit-mccain-but-not-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-424374</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 17:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10876#comment-424374</guid>
		<description>Unfair. Period.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfair. Period.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
