<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hillary For Secretary Of State?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patrick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-425407</link>
		<dc:creator>patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-425407</guid>
		<description>if Hillary becomes the Sec. State, hopefully she will be able to concentrate on country-centric issues without being distracted by other drama or her career plans</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if Hillary becomes the Sec. State, hopefully she will be able to concentrate on country-centric issues without being distracted by other drama or her career plans</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Hillary For Secretary Of State?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-424791</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why Hillary For Secretary Of State?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-424791</guid>
		<description>[...] speculated about this earlier today, and Marc Ambinder has some thoughts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] speculated about this earlier today, and Marc Ambinder has some thoughts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mw</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-424761</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 16:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-424761</guid>
		<description>Billary would do a great job at State. But I don&#039;t think it is going to happen.I think Hillary wants to put her mark on history. After eight years of an Obama presidency, I don&#039;t expect she believes she&#039;ll have a realistic shot at the Oval office. There have been female Secretaries of State before, and ultimately the job is to carry water for the policies set by the President. Not her style. She wants to shape policy, she wants high visibility, and she wants to be first. 

She does all three as Majority Leader in the Senate. I&#039;m betting she replaces Reid.  After Obama restores Lieberman, he&#039;ll need to throw the left flank a bone. They have not been happy with Reid&#039;s leadership. It is not his call, but if he puts his weight behind Hillary leading the Senate, I expect she&#039;ll get it. 

Plus, if Obama does Hillary this favor, she&#039;ll owe him one. Its the Chicago way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Billary would do a great job at State. But I don&#8217;t think it is going to happen.I think Hillary wants to put her mark on history. After eight years of an Obama presidency, I don&#8217;t expect she believes she&#8217;ll have a realistic shot at the Oval office. There have been female Secretaries of State before, and ultimately the job is to carry water for the policies set by the President. Not her style. She wants to shape policy, she wants high visibility, and she wants to be first. </p>
<p>She does all three as Majority Leader in the Senate. I&#8217;m betting she replaces Reid.  After Obama restores Lieberman, he&#8217;ll need to throw the left flank a bone. They have not been happy with Reid&#8217;s leadership. It is not his call, but if he puts his weight behind Hillary leading the Senate, I expect she&#8217;ll get it. </p>
<p>Plus, if Obama does Hillary this favor, she&#8217;ll owe him one. Its the Chicago way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wj</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-424759</link>
		<dc:creator>wj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 15:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-424759</guid>
		<description>Two questions:  
1) What&#039;s in it for Clinton?  For furthering her political career, the Senate looks like a better long-term bet.  
2) What does Clinton bring to the job of Secretary of State that others cannot bring just as well or better?  Lots of other people with just as much experience in foreign affairs, and her focus has tended to be domestic, has it not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two questions:<br />
1) What&#8217;s in it for Clinton?  For furthering her political career, the Senate looks like a better long-term bet.<br />
2) What does Clinton bring to the job of Secretary of State that others cannot bring just as well or better?  Lots of other people with just as much experience in foreign affairs, and her focus has tended to be domestic, has it not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agnostick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-424750</link>
		<dc:creator>Agnostick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 14:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-424750</guid>
		<description>No.

Hell no.

F**k no.

Absolutely not.

No, &lt;b&gt;no, NO!!!!&lt;/b&gt;

&quot;And with Hillary you get Bill.&quot;

Exactly how is bringing the Clintons back, emblematic of &quot;change?&quot;

Chuck Hagel would be a much better choice... and bringing a Republican or two into the fold would certainly live up to that promise of &quot;change.&quot;

Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
<p>Hell no.</p>
<p>F**k no.</p>
<p>Absolutely not.</p>
<p>No, <b>no, NO!!!!</b></p>
<p>&#8220;And with Hillary you get Bill.&#8221;</p>
<p>Exactly how is bringing the Clintons back, emblematic of &#8220;change?&#8221;</p>
<p>Chuck Hagel would be a much better choice&#8230; and bringing a Republican or two into the fold would certainly live up to that promise of &#8220;change.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agnostick<br />
<a href="mailto:agnostick@excite.com">agnostick@excite.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Mataconis</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-424739</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Mataconis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 12:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-424739</guid>
		<description>Why am I reminded of The West Wing yet again ?

Secretary of State Clinton = Secretary of State Vinick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why am I reminded of The West Wing yet again ?</p>
<p>Secretary of State Clinton = Secretary of State Vinick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trescml</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/14/hillary-for-secretary-of-state/comment-page-1/#comment-424732</link>
		<dc:creator>Trescml</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=10951#comment-424732</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting to bring in someone who disagreed with some of your diplomatic plans during the primary.  Clinton would certainly be a big name that has clout in the world and certainly can do the job. What surprises me more is that this was leaked because if she doesn&#039;t get the job, it will irk those who supported her in the primaries (and Obama in the general election).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to bring in someone who disagreed with some of your diplomatic plans during the primary.  Clinton would certainly be a big name that has clout in the world and certainly can do the job. What surprises me more is that this was leaked because if she doesn&#8217;t get the job, it will irk those who supported her in the primaries (and Obama in the general election).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
