<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building A Progressive Republican Movement: An Interview with Travis Johnson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Smith</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-433609</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:44:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-433609</guid>
		<description>I challenge TerenceC on the &quot;progressive Republican ... oxymoron&quot; thing. I have been a Republican since I was 18 in 1982 and I have voted for the Republican presidential candidate in each election.

I am also pro-choice, pro gay marriage, and pro-affirmative action.

Lesser evils has often been how I descibe my presidential choices, particularly with George W Bush. There was no way I could have cast a ballot for Al Gore or John Kerry: both were terrible candidates for president.

Barrack Obama made a very compelling case for himself and while I have always like John McCain alot this election was anything but a choice of lesser evils.

A progressive Republican is someone who believes in smaller government and less government regulation/involvement in people lives. 

A progressive Republican is someone who is tolerant of other peoples lifestyles, doesn&#039;t believe outlawing abortion is a solution, knows that more people die from prescription drugs than illegal drugs (and by a very wide margin), and thinks that the political dialogue ought to involve more meaningful debates than what dominates political discussion today.

Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln are prime examples of progressive Republicans.

For instance: As a Republican, strictly interpreting the Constitution, I find it impossible to be against gay marriage. The language is about &quot;people&quot; as in &quot;We the people&quot; not &quot;We the men&quot; or &quot;We the white men&quot;. As such these laws are for all Americans without regard to their gender or ethnicity. We can no more stand in the way of gay couples marrying as we could stand in the way of black people marrying. People have the right to marry; all people.

As marriage is interpreted within the religious sphere this: civil marriage is not the same as religious marriage. Allowing one does not force upon the other anything.

Further, I am an atheist progressive Republican. Now tell me thats an oxymoron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I challenge TerenceC on the &#8220;progressive Republican &#8230; oxymoron&#8221; thing. I have been a Republican since I was 18 in 1982 and I have voted for the Republican presidential candidate in each election.</p>
<p>I am also pro-choice, pro gay marriage, and pro-affirmative action.</p>
<p>Lesser evils has often been how I descibe my presidential choices, particularly with George W Bush. There was no way I could have cast a ballot for Al Gore or John Kerry: both were terrible candidates for president.</p>
<p>Barrack Obama made a very compelling case for himself and while I have always like John McCain alot this election was anything but a choice of lesser evils.</p>
<p>A progressive Republican is someone who believes in smaller government and less government regulation/involvement in people lives. </p>
<p>A progressive Republican is someone who is tolerant of other peoples lifestyles, doesn&#8217;t believe outlawing abortion is a solution, knows that more people die from prescription drugs than illegal drugs (and by a very wide margin), and thinks that the political dialogue ought to involve more meaningful debates than what dominates political discussion today.</p>
<p>Teddy Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln are prime examples of progressive Republicans.</p>
<p>For instance: As a Republican, strictly interpreting the Constitution, I find it impossible to be against gay marriage. The language is about &#8220;people&#8221; as in &#8220;We the people&#8221; not &#8220;We the men&#8221; or &#8220;We the white men&#8221;. As such these laws are for all Americans without regard to their gender or ethnicity. We can no more stand in the way of gay couples marrying as we could stand in the way of black people marrying. People have the right to marry; all people.</p>
<p>As marriage is interpreted within the religious sphere this: civil marriage is not the same as religious marriage. Allowing one does not force upon the other anything.</p>
<p>Further, I am an atheist progressive Republican. Now tell me thats an oxymoron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike at The Big Stick</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike at The Big Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 12:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426465</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve refered to myself as a &#039;progressive conservative&#039; for several years. Progressive simply means that you are seeking change or that you recognize that change is a good thing. 

The choice is not between change or no change (traditional view of conservative verses liberal) because change is inevitable. The choice is between unchecked, untested and overly optimistic change i.e. reckless or a careful and restrained change that honors the best of American social, political and national traditions. 

You &lt;i&gt;can&lt;/i&gt; be a &#039;progressive&#039; AND be a conservative. You just have to be willing to move forward instead of spending all your time glorifying Reagan and Goldwater.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve refered to myself as a &#8216;progressive conservative&#8217; for several years. Progressive simply means that you are seeking change or that you recognize that change is a good thing. </p>
<p>The choice is not between change or no change (traditional view of conservative verses liberal) because change is inevitable. The choice is between unchecked, untested and overly optimistic change i.e. reckless or a careful and restrained change that honors the best of American social, political and national traditions. </p>
<p>You <i>can</i> be a &#8216;progressive&#8217; AND be a conservative. You just have to be willing to move forward instead of spending all your time glorifying Reagan and Goldwater.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.theSmallBusinessCoach.com</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426198</link>
		<dc:creator>www.theSmallBusinessCoach.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426198</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the desire to identify with a party or with labels more strongly than the desire to stand for good ideas and policies. 

If a &quot;party&quot; or a politician has moved away from the ideas or policies you believe in then quickly and easily move your support and vote for those support what you do believe in. If they don&#039;t stay with those ideas and policies - move your support away again.  

If more Americans gave their support  based on ideas and policies not parties and labels, and withheld it when the politicians deviated from those ideas and policies I bet the leaders would follow us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the desire to identify with a party or with labels more strongly than the desire to stand for good ideas and policies. </p>
<p>If a &#8220;party&#8221; or a politician has moved away from the ideas or policies you believe in then quickly and easily move your support and vote for those support what you do believe in. If they don&#8217;t stay with those ideas and policies &#8211; move your support away again.  </p>
<p>If more Americans gave their support  based on ideas and policies not parties and labels, and withheld it when the politicians deviated from those ideas and policies I bet the leaders would follow us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426181</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426181</guid>
		<description>Dude, your are a Democrat but you just don&#039;t realize it yet. The Republican Party is firmly controlled by the hard right lunatic fringe and there is nothing you can do about it. Give up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, your are a Democrat but you just don&#8217;t realize it yet. The Republican Party is firmly controlled by the hard right lunatic fringe and there is nothing you can do about it. Give up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2008-11-28 &#187; AaronPaulley.com</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426179</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2008-11-28 &#187; AaronPaulley.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426179</guid>
		<description>[...] Donklephant Â» Blog Archive Â» Building A Progressive Republican Movement: An Interview with Travis ... (tags: republicans) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Donklephant Â» Blog Archive Â» Building A Progressive Republican Movement: An Interview with Travis &#8230; (tags: republicans) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dr-steve</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426177</link>
		<dc:creator>dr-steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426177</guid>
		<description>Please please please, the return of the Progressive party.  Call yourself what you are, moderates, centrists, believer in the balance between fiscally and societally responsible policies.  The needs of the community to take care of those who can&#039;t take care of themselves, balanced with the demand that those who can take care of themselves, do.

If you insist on retaining the Republican label (though you have been alienated from the Old Tyme Republicans, who call you RINO), you likewise alienate the moderate Democrats who fundamentally believe in what you believe.

Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please please please, the return of the Progressive party.  Call yourself what you are, moderates, centrists, believer in the balance between fiscally and societally responsible policies.  The needs of the community to take care of those who can&#8217;t take care of themselves, balanced with the demand that those who can take care of themselves, do.</p>
<p>If you insist on retaining the Republican label (though you have been alienated from the Old Tyme Republicans, who call you RINO), you likewise alienate the moderate Democrats who fundamentally believe in what you believe.</p>
<p>Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426176</link>
		<dc:creator>G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 01:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426176</guid>
		<description>The principals of the 20th century Republican Party have been completely betrayed by its leaders. It&#039;s morphed into the party of mistrust, greed, hate, anger, fear, ignorance and tyranny; all the things that need to disappear from American society. The party is dying. Let it go and be replaced by something better. By the way, fiscal responsibility isn&#039;t a republican or democratic idea, it&#039;s common sense. Size of government isn&#039;t a real issue, it&#039;s the quality of government that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The principals of the 20th century Republican Party have been completely betrayed by its leaders. It&#8217;s morphed into the party of mistrust, greed, hate, anger, fear, ignorance and tyranny; all the things that need to disappear from American society. The party is dying. Let it go and be replaced by something better. By the way, fiscal responsibility isn&#8217;t a republican or democratic idea, it&#8217;s common sense. Size of government isn&#8217;t a real issue, it&#8217;s the quality of government that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Defalut Dem</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426173</link>
		<dc:creator>Defalut Dem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 23:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426173</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe that Republicans still won&#039;t talk about the elephant in their room. You can&#039;t pander to rascists and extremists, and expect moderates or minorities to not feel threatened. Before I was old enough to vote I learned who the Republicans were through Willie Horton and David Duke. I&#039;m not a Black man that votes default Democrat, I&#039;m a pragmatist who votes AGAINST those who threaten my life, liberties, family, and existence. Republicans made me vote Democrat and seem determined to keep doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe that Republicans still won&#8217;t talk about the elephant in their room. You can&#8217;t pander to rascists and extremists, and expect moderates or minorities to not feel threatened. Before I was old enough to vote I learned who the Republicans were through Willie Horton and David Duke. I&#8217;m not a Black man that votes default Democrat, I&#8217;m a pragmatist who votes AGAINST those who threaten my life, liberties, family, and existence. Republicans made me vote Democrat and seem determined to keep doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrest m</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426171</link>
		<dc:creator>forrest m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426171</guid>
		<description>I had friends once who were northeastern Republicans;  socially liberal and fiscally conservative, live and let live, tolerant people.

I still have a brother-in-law who is a mean spirited, evil man who looks for novel ways to express his racism and intolerance.

Nothing, nothing, nothing has pleased me as much in a long time as this long overdue drubbing of the right at the polls.  I hope I am witnessing the end of the party, since long ago, the former (good) Republicans were killed off by the latter (bad) ones.

Now, for a change, we have an educated and intelligent man in office, supported by a near super-majority in the Senate.  The chance to make this a permanent liberal majority is again in our hands.  Now WE can gerrymander the entire country.  Now WE can stack the courts.  Now WE are the difficult to eject incumbents.  Undoing the destruction of the Bush years is at hand.  Restoring the constitution is at hand.  Economic sanity is at hand.

Rejoice, former republicans....   you&#039;re getting what you want;  salvation from the bible-thumping overlords and Rich White Masters of your party.  Circumstances will force small government, business innovation, American world leadership, and responsible social and environmental policy.  Forget your party.  Join the one that will make a difference in your lives and which will concentrate on making the NOW important, and not some mythical here-after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had friends once who were northeastern Republicans;  socially liberal and fiscally conservative, live and let live, tolerant people.</p>
<p>I still have a brother-in-law who is a mean spirited, evil man who looks for novel ways to express his racism and intolerance.</p>
<p>Nothing, nothing, nothing has pleased me as much in a long time as this long overdue drubbing of the right at the polls.  I hope I am witnessing the end of the party, since long ago, the former (good) Republicans were killed off by the latter (bad) ones.</p>
<p>Now, for a change, we have an educated and intelligent man in office, supported by a near super-majority in the Senate.  The chance to make this a permanent liberal majority is again in our hands.  Now WE can gerrymander the entire country.  Now WE can stack the courts.  Now WE are the difficult to eject incumbents.  Undoing the destruction of the Bush years is at hand.  Restoring the constitution is at hand.  Economic sanity is at hand.</p>
<p>Rejoice, former republicans&#8230;.   you&#8217;re getting what you want;  salvation from the bible-thumping overlords and Rich White Masters of your party.  Circumstances will force small government, business innovation, American world leadership, and responsible social and environmental policy.  Forget your party.  Join the one that will make a difference in your lives and which will concentrate on making the NOW important, and not some mythical here-after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Love Corporations</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426163</link>
		<dc:creator>I Love Corporations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426163</guid>
		<description>This could be the start of something useful. Something great.

The GOP used to believe in small government and fiscal responsibility. The Bush years were the exact opposite of this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be the start of something useful. Something great.</p>
<p>The GOP used to believe in small government and fiscal responsibility. The Bush years were the exact opposite of this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426162</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426162</guid>
		<description>First of all, I want to qualify myself by stating that I&#039;m an independent)

It seems you just may be a Conservative Democrat!

  Why would you choose to stay in a party with people who you so obviously (and justly) dispise and disagree with?

  Also, why whould you a black man (or really anyone who hate racists), chose to support a party which gets the support of the majority of racists? I have never understood that..

Anyway, I respect what your doing, I hope it picks up support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I want to qualify myself by stating that I&#8217;m an independent)</p>
<p>It seems you just may be a Conservative Democrat!</p>
<p>  Why would you choose to stay in a party with people who you so obviously (and justly) dispise and disagree with?</p>
<p>  Also, why whould you a black man (or really anyone who hate racists), chose to support a party which gets the support of the majority of racists? I have never understood that..</p>
<p>Anyway, I respect what your doing, I hope it picks up support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Jackson</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426161</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426161</guid>
		<description>Your cause already exists.  It&#039;s called the Democratic party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your cause already exists.  It&#8217;s called the Democratic party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426160</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 18:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426160</guid>
		<description>It is important for the populace to remember that economic freedoms and political freedoms cannot be divorced. The are entrinsically entertwined so deeply as to be one in the same.
When the Republicans and Democrats are both spending as much as possible it is difficult to consider either one truly conservative. The overspending creates a future economic enslavement that is beginning to show itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is important for the populace to remember that economic freedoms and political freedoms cannot be divorced. The are entrinsically entertwined so deeply as to be one in the same.<br />
When the Republicans and Democrats are both spending as much as possible it is difficult to consider either one truly conservative. The overspending creates a future economic enslavement that is beginning to show itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426106</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426106</guid>
		<description>People entranced by the God Spell are the problem, not the solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People entranced by the God Spell are the problem, not the solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lofton, Recovering Republican</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-426036</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lofton, Recovering Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-426036</guid>
		<description>Forget &quot;conservatism,&quot; please. It has been Godless and thus irrelevant. As Stonewall Jackson&#039;s Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:

â€[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It .is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth.&quot;

Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).


John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com

Recovering Republican

JLof@aol.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget &#8220;conservatism,&#8221; please. It has been Godless and thus irrelevant. As Stonewall Jackson&#8217;s Chief of Staff R.L. Dabney said of such a humanistic belief more than 100 years ago:</p>
<p>â€[Secular conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today .one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt bath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It .is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our country is collapsing because we have turned our back on God (Psalm 9:17) and refused to kiss His Son (Psalm 2).</p>
<p>John Lofton, Editor, TheAmericanView.com</p>
<p>Recovering Republican</p>
<p><a href="mailto:JLof@aol.com">JLof@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/11/25/building-a-progressive-republican-movement-an-interivew-with-travis-johnson/comment-page-1/#comment-425974</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=11384#comment-425974</guid>
		<description>Progressive Republican is an oxymoron. Like compassionate conservative or moral majority. However, this type of thinking is exactly what the Republican party needs. The &quot;evangelical&quot; voter showed up for McCain in record numbers (some targets put it at 1.5 million more voters then came out for bush in 2004), but they couldn&#039;t deliver. A narrow, emotionally focused, fear charged platform may be the way to win elections from time to time, but it is not the way to govern a country as diverse as this one. The Republican party has to jettison the influence of the religious right and the incredibly wealthy if it wants to appeal to a more diverse electorate. I wish this gentleman the best of luck in his pursuit - it is a worthy one - although not one I am inclined to take up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Progressive Republican is an oxymoron. Like compassionate conservative or moral majority. However, this type of thinking is exactly what the Republican party needs. The &#8220;evangelical&#8221; voter showed up for McCain in record numbers (some targets put it at 1.5 million more voters then came out for bush in 2004), but they couldn&#8217;t deliver. A narrow, emotionally focused, fear charged platform may be the way to win elections from time to time, but it is not the way to govern a country as diverse as this one. The Republican party has to jettison the influence of the religious right and the incredibly wealthy if it wants to appeal to a more diverse electorate. I wish this gentleman the best of luck in his pursuit &#8211; it is a worthy one &#8211; although not one I am inclined to take up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

