<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rep. Bobby Rush backs Blago Senate pick: &#8220;Don&#8217;t lynch the appointee&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2008/12/30/rep-bobby-rush-backs-blago-senate-pick-dont-lynch-the-appointee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/30/rep-bobby-rush-backs-blago-senate-pick-dont-lynch-the-appointee/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hazeleyes</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/30/rep-bobby-rush-backs-blago-senate-pick-dont-lynch-the-appointee/comment-page-1/#comment-434871</link>
		<dc:creator>hazeleyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12433#comment-434871</guid>
		<description>I am remembering The Old Mayor Hizzoner&#039;s friend Paddy Bauler&#039;s infamous quote: CHICAGO AIN&#039;T READY FOR REFORM!

And Chicago (and Illinois) still may not be ready.

A few weeks ago I heard someone on radio mention that Obama got the US senate seat because Chicago pols wanted him out of the state instead of in the Illinois governorship -- they didn&#039;t want him playing in their back yard anymore.

The Blago office-selling flap raises interesting questions.

Let&#039;s all watch to see if any dots  appear between ethics changes that Blago wanted and the US senate seat &#039;scandal&#039;. 

Chicago has seen much worse than the sale of political office, and in fact speaking of sale of political offices, if local pols are so offended about the sale of a senate seat, where were they when Mayor Daley held back Cook County&#039;s vote talley the night  Cook County elected Jack Kennedy? And which judge promised Joe Kennedy his kid would be elected by Chicago?

This paragraph from the ethics change story is something that for sure would  set Chicago machine policians&#039; hair on fire:
 
&quot;Blagojevich last month used his amendatory veto power to expand the contractor donation ban to lawmakers and all state officeholders. He also tried to change how pay raises would be voted on, bar lawmakers from holding most other government jobs and require them to more fully disclose lobbying work&quot;

With lawmakers and state office-holders&#039; &#039;donations&#039; from contractors, self-voted pay raises, and other sources of off-the-books income in jeopardy, you better believe that the whole state legislature, not to mention every Chicago machine politician past, present, and future would want Blago gone. 

From the &#039;reform&#039; story: â€œLetâ€™s go ahead and give the people of the state of Illinois what they want and what they deserve,â€ Fritchey said

Oh yeah. And he was using the one-finger salute to let his audience know exactly what he meant.

Cynical? Yes, but I&#039;ve been living in and near Chicago since Hizzoner was king...er, I mean Mayor. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


 &quot;Is Illinois ready for ethics?

The House undid in about two minutes the sweeping ethics reform rewrite Blagojevich spent two months putting together.

The House voted 110-3 for the original version of House Bill 824 that lawmakers passed in May. That version would bar people with state contracts worth $50,000 or more from making political donations to state officeholders overseeing the contracts. 
 
Blagojevich also issued an executive order effective Jan. 1 barring people with high-dollar contracts with agencies under his control from giving donations to any state officeholders or lawmakers.

Blagojevich last month used his amendatory veto power to expand the contractor donation ban to lawmakers and all state officeholders. He also tried to change how pay raises would be voted on, bar lawmakers from holding most other government jobs and require them to more fully disclose lobbying work.

Rep. John Fritchey, D-Chicago, said lawmakers should consider the changes in separate bills that he filed Wednesday, not in a take-it-or-leave-it vote. 

â€œLetâ€™s go ahead and give the people of the state of Illinois what they want and what they deserve,â€ Fritchey said. 

The vote came just hours after Blagojevich had urged lawmakers not to override his changes because he fears they will be stalled if theyâ€™re put into separate bills.

If the measure isnâ€™t voted on in the Senate within 15 days, the entire bill and the changes die.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am remembering The Old Mayor Hizzoner&#8217;s friend Paddy Bauler&#8217;s infamous quote: CHICAGO AIN&#8217;T READY FOR REFORM!</p>
<p>And Chicago (and Illinois) still may not be ready.</p>
<p>A few weeks ago I heard someone on radio mention that Obama got the US senate seat because Chicago pols wanted him out of the state instead of in the Illinois governorship &#8212; they didn&#8217;t want him playing in their back yard anymore.</p>
<p>The Blago office-selling flap raises interesting questions.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s all watch to see if any dots  appear between ethics changes that Blago wanted and the US senate seat &#8217;scandal&#8217;. </p>
<p>Chicago has seen much worse than the sale of political office, and in fact speaking of sale of political offices, if local pols are so offended about the sale of a senate seat, where were they when Mayor Daley held back Cook County&#8217;s vote talley the night  Cook County elected Jack Kennedy? And which judge promised Joe Kennedy his kid would be elected by Chicago?</p>
<p>This paragraph from the ethics change story is something that for sure would  set Chicago machine policians&#8217; hair on fire:</p>
<p>&#8220;Blagojevich last month used his amendatory veto power to expand the contractor donation ban to lawmakers and all state officeholders. He also tried to change how pay raises would be voted on, bar lawmakers from holding most other government jobs and require them to more fully disclose lobbying work&#8221;</p>
<p>With lawmakers and state office-holders&#8217; &#8216;donations&#8217; from contractors, self-voted pay raises, and other sources of off-the-books income in jeopardy, you better believe that the whole state legislature, not to mention every Chicago machine politician past, present, and future would want Blago gone. </p>
<p>From the &#8216;reform&#8217; story: â€œLetâ€™s go ahead and give the people of the state of Illinois what they want and what they deserve,â€ Fritchey said</p>
<p>Oh yeah. And he was using the one-finger salute to let his audience know exactly what he meant.</p>
<p>Cynical? Yes, but I&#8217;ve been living in and near Chicago since Hizzoner was king&#8230;er, I mean Mayor. </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> &#8220;Is Illinois ready for ethics?</p>
<p>The House undid in about two minutes the sweeping ethics reform rewrite Blagojevich spent two months putting together.</p>
<p>The House voted 110-3 for the original version of House Bill 824 that lawmakers passed in May. That version would bar people with state contracts worth $50,000 or more from making political donations to state officeholders overseeing the contracts. </p>
<p>Blagojevich also issued an executive order effective Jan. 1 barring people with high-dollar contracts with agencies under his control from giving donations to any state officeholders or lawmakers.</p>
<p>Blagojevich last month used his amendatory veto power to expand the contractor donation ban to lawmakers and all state officeholders. He also tried to change how pay raises would be voted on, bar lawmakers from holding most other government jobs and require them to more fully disclose lobbying work.</p>
<p>Rep. John Fritchey, D-Chicago, said lawmakers should consider the changes in separate bills that he filed Wednesday, not in a take-it-or-leave-it vote. </p>
<p>â€œLetâ€™s go ahead and give the people of the state of Illinois what they want and what they deserve,â€ Fritchey said. </p>
<p>The vote came just hours after Blagojevich had urged lawmakers not to override his changes because he fears they will be stalled if theyâ€™re put into separate bills.</p>
<p>If the measure isnâ€™t voted on in the Senate within 15 days, the entire bill and the changes die.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy from Oregon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/30/rep-bobby-rush-backs-blago-senate-pick-dont-lynch-the-appointee/comment-page-1/#comment-434337</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy from Oregon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 22:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12433#comment-434337</guid>
		<description>J. Harden, I agree with you. This comment is entirely inappropriate. Politics are not high theater. This comment is so out of context it manages to insult the tragedy in which it invokes. I suggest Rush hire a speech writer and stick to Que Cards for now on. Idiot!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Harden, I agree with you. This comment is entirely inappropriate. Politics are not high theater. This comment is so out of context it manages to insult the tragedy in which it invokes. I suggest Rush hire a speech writer and stick to Que Cards for now on. Idiot!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Jones</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/30/rep-bobby-rush-backs-blago-senate-pick-dont-lynch-the-appointee/comment-page-1/#comment-434327</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12433#comment-434327</guid>
		<description>Gov. Blagojevich is the poster child for everything that is wrong with American politics. Although I am a firm believer in innocent until proven guilty, the evidence put forth so far shows Blagojevich to be an arrogant abuser of his constituency. This latest move by Blagojevich is no surprise as he is trying to cover his flank in a battle which was certainly lost before. The appointment of Burris is little else for Blagojevich than a smoke screen, albeit an intelligent one. Having Bobby Rush on hand to present the appointee to America with a racial ultimatum was the icing on the cake. 
On the other side of the coin:  Blagojevich is legally within his rights as a standing &quot;Head of State&quot; to appoint Attorney General Roland Burris. Actually, it is the Governor&#039;s duty to make sure that Illinois is represented in the Senate. President Elect Obama made a serious mistake by agreeing with the Senate that the appointment would not be confirmed. This is an inherent American problem of lumping everything together under one label. It is too bad that Barack Obama has already succumbed to this train of thought.
A good sifting is what should occur now. Here is the way it should roll from here in a perfect world:

1. Roland Burris should be confirmed on the merits of his outstanding record of public service.

2. Impeachment proceedings against Governor Blagojevich should be initiated ASAP.

3. If so warranted by discovery during the impeachment proceedings, criminal charges against Governor Blagojevich should be filed. If an indictment is brought against Blagojevich, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

4. Bobby Rush should be held accountable for his inciting remarks and made to explain his reasons for the choice in vocabulary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Blagojevich is the poster child for everything that is wrong with American politics. Although I am a firm believer in innocent until proven guilty, the evidence put forth so far shows Blagojevich to be an arrogant abuser of his constituency. This latest move by Blagojevich is no surprise as he is trying to cover his flank in a battle which was certainly lost before. The appointment of Burris is little else for Blagojevich than a smoke screen, albeit an intelligent one. Having Bobby Rush on hand to present the appointee to America with a racial ultimatum was the icing on the cake.<br />
On the other side of the coin:  Blagojevich is legally within his rights as a standing &#8220;Head of State&#8221; to appoint Attorney General Roland Burris. Actually, it is the Governor&#8217;s duty to make sure that Illinois is represented in the Senate. President Elect Obama made a serious mistake by agreeing with the Senate that the appointment would not be confirmed. This is an inherent American problem of lumping everything together under one label. It is too bad that Barack Obama has already succumbed to this train of thought.<br />
A good sifting is what should occur now. Here is the way it should roll from here in a perfect world:</p>
<p>1. Roland Burris should be confirmed on the merits of his outstanding record of public service.</p>
<p>2. Impeachment proceedings against Governor Blagojevich should be initiated ASAP.</p>
<p>3. If so warranted by discovery during the impeachment proceedings, criminal charges against Governor Blagojevich should be filed. If an indictment is brought against Blagojevich, he should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.</p>
<p>4. Bobby Rush should be held accountable for his inciting remarks and made to explain his reasons for the choice in vocabulary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Harden</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2008/12/30/rep-bobby-rush-backs-blago-senate-pick-dont-lynch-the-appointee/comment-page-1/#comment-434311</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12433#comment-434311</guid>
		<description>Sensitivity Alert!!  Code Red! Code Red!

Does anyone think it is more than a bit inappropriate for Rush to use the ole&#039; &quot;hang&#039;em/lynch&#039;em&quot; language.  No one is supposing that the Senate would not seat Burris because of his race and to illicite such historically charged imagery seems totally out of place, inappropriate and a naked race play.

The silence is deafening coming out the guilty-ridden chambers of Starbucks.  No magic touch for this poor guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sensitivity Alert!!  Code Red! Code Red!</p>
<p>Does anyone think it is more than a bit inappropriate for Rush to use the ole&#8217; &#8220;hang&#8217;em/lynch&#8217;em&#8221; language.  No one is supposing that the Senate would not seat Burris because of his race and to illicite such historically charged imagery seems totally out of place, inappropriate and a naked race play.</p>
<p>The silence is deafening coming out the guilty-ridden chambers of Starbucks.  No magic touch for this poor guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
