Sarah Palin vs. The Blogosphere, Round Two

By Doug Mataconis | Related entries in 2008 Election, Palin, Politics

Back in November, Sarah Palin unloaded on the blogosphere in one of her first post-election interviews.

And, she’s back at it again:

(CNN) — Sarah Palin fired a new salvo in her war on the media, unloading in a new interview on her home state paper and “bored, anonymous, pathetic bloggers who lie.”

The Alaska governor, who has granted a steady stream of interviews since Election Day, also told an Esquire reporter that she wishes she had told McCain campaign advisors she’d be “callin’ some of the shots.”

“Bored, anonymous, pathetic bloggers who lie annoy me….I’ll tell you, yesterday the Anchorage Daily News, they called again to ask — double-, triple-, quadruple-check — who is Trig’s real mom,” she said, in an interview to be published in the magazine’s March issue.

“And I said, Come on, are you kidding me? We’re gonna answer this? Do you not believe me or my doctor? And they said, No, it’s been quite cryptic the way that my son’s birth has been discussed. And I thought, Okay, more indication of continued problems in the world of journalism.”

The only problem is that Palin completely mischaracterizes what it was that the Anchorage Daily News was doing:

In an Anchorage Daily News column published last week, the paper’s editor said the only questions reporters there had asked about Trig’s birth came when the paper undertook a project to debunk conspiracy theories surrounding the event, but that they had abandoned the effort because of a lack of cooperation from the Palin family.

“I don’t believe we have ever published in the newspaper a story, a letter, a column or anything alleging a coverup surrounding your maternity,” wrote the editor in an e-mail sent to Palin and reprinted on the paper’s blog. “In fact, my integrity and the integrity of the newspaper have been repeatedly attacked in national forums for our complicity in the ‘coverup.’

Later, he added: “…So I don’t understand the behavior of the governor’s press office. Did the governor not share my email with the press staff? Did the press staff deliberately ignore what I said in order to have a longer list of press ‘outrages’? Or are they just sloppy with details? I don’t know.”

So, Palin’s effort to play the victim here fails miserably, but then I really think she doesn’t get it when I read stuff like this:

Even hard news sources, credible news sources — the comment about, you can see Russia from Alaska. You can! You can see Russia from Alaska. Something like that — a factual statement that was taken out of context and mocked — what you have to do is let that go.”

What Palin fails to address, of course, is the fact that Alaska’s proximity to Russia, which is a manifest fact, was cited by Palin and by several McCain campaign surrogates (see here, here, and here) as evidence of her foreign policy experience. As we learned soon after this idiotic idea was put forward, though, Palin has absolutely no role in homeland defense despite being Governor of Alaska because, you know, Alaska is a state and national defense is a Federal responsibility.

But back to the blogging thing. Michael Stallings at The Moderate Voice thinks that it’s evidence of Palin’s disdain for anyone who dares to criticize her:

Really, though, she’s not referring to anyone. She’s just attacking bloggers generally. Just like she thinks we all live in our parents’ basements, so does she think that we’re all bored and pathetic (and anonymous?), a bunch of liars. It’s just her way of lashing out at her critics, at anyone who dares question her. (I’m sure she’s fine with the many bloggers on the right who helped make her what she became, who drooled all over her and who long for her to lead them to the promised land of conservative bliss — God, guns, and a whole lotta drilling.) She avoided — or was kept away from — the media during the campaign, but now she’s a media manipulator herself, using various friendly media outlets on the right, as well as more mainstream outlets, to spew her spin and promote her cause, namely, herself.

As long as the media still bother to put a camera and microphone in front of her, enabling her and keeping her in the public eye long past her expiry date, we’ll have to put up with this sort of nonsense. And while we’re talking about lying, it’s Palin herself who’s full of dishonesty, as when she attacks the Anchorage Daily News for probing (and questioning) her maternity, an attack without basis in reality. But, then, so much of what Palin says and does is without basis in reality, and, in her eternal quest for victimhood (they’re all against me!), she’s apparently willing to make any claim, however fraudulent.

And that’s going to continue as long as she continues to find an audience willing to listen. Sadly, I think Sarah Palin is here to stay.

Originally posted at Below The Beltway


This entry was posted on Thursday, January 15th, 2009 and is filed under 2008 Election, Palin, Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “Sarah Palin vs. The Blogosphere, Round Two”

  1. John Carpenter Says:

    ” Sadly, I think Sarah Palin is here to stay… .”

    Sadly, for who?

    Liberals? Mike Huckabee and Mitt Romney?

    Certainly not for the vast number of Americans who have witnessed the bloodletting by the media AND bloggers who, because of New York Times co v.
    Sullivan can publish just about anything they want about a public official with impunity no matter how vicious the defamation.

    The most entertaining aspect of the outcries of righteous indignation coming from the media and blogosphere is that Palin could care less. She is fearless and knowingly or not, is employing a strategy of warfare articulated by Sun Tzu
    in the “Art of War”:

    “If your opponent is of choleric temper, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant.”

    And again,

    “Standing on the defensive indicates insufficient
    strength; attacking, a superabundance of strength.”

    If I were a publisher, a player in the democratic party, or Obama himself, I’d spend a few hours with Sun Tzu. The thing is, based on the Katie Couric interview and a much-exaggerated clip from the Charles Gibson tete a tete, the left thinks they know all they need to know about this woman. They haven’t got a clue and by dismissing her as a lightweight, Palin’s detractors are marching
    into a trap:

  2. Jon Says:

    You seriously think she has ever ready “The art of war”? That would be a big task for someone who cant name a single printed source of where they get their news.

  3. ExiledIndependent Says:

    Lol, Justin, you *still* have a hate-on for this woman? Inauguration day is coming up–bask in the glow and let it go ;)

  4. Aaron Says:

    Its a train wreck. We have to stop and point and crazy. Its in our nature. :)

  5. Aaron Says:

    We have to stop and point AT crazy, that is. Sorry!

  6. DEO Says:

    THE MANY LIES OF SARAH PALIN series by Andrew Sullivan is pretty informative and always backed up with many references. If the American people are interested they can read what they want to.
    The anonymous bloggers (an erroneous label by Palin) are the DIARISTS. US, me and you, the people that comment at the end of articles on blogs, which ARE NOT ANONYMOUS, bloggers are NOT anonymous.
    Since Palin and company, propped themselves up on the national stage and asked to be the second family of the United States, I guess we have a right to ask and say, anything we want to. We will leave the blind allegiance to TEAM SARAH.
    Palin pretty much re-writes history on a constant basis, I am glad someone like Andrew Sullivan is paying attention and drawing our attention to OUR lying eyes and ears, lol.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: