<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russ Feingold Wants To End Governor Appointed Senators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/01/26/russ-feingold-wants-to-end-governor-appointed-senators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/26/russ-feingold-wants-to-end-governor-appointed-senators/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/26/russ-feingold-wants-to-end-governor-appointed-senators/comment-page-1/#comment-435636</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12984#comment-435636</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t like the idea of appointed replacements either. But I think some less expensive options to a full-scale election (with the concurrent extra-low turnout, too!)ought to be considered, like an expedited mail-in election. Maybe candidates get a month to collect 5k signatures, and then there&#039;s a run-off, by mail (saving dough on all that show up at the local VFW stuff) and then the top 2 have a run-off 2 weeks later. Or maybe we force the state senate to figure it out.

Further, I think it&#039;s a good idea to come up with some sort of penalty for elected officials who bail for greener pastures. At minimum, we should expect them to sign a pledge to serve their full term and at minimum NOT launch a campaign for another office any time soon after getting re-elected. If you are elected to a 6 year term, you should be willing to promise to serve a minimum of 3 years beofr looking toward the exit. To me, it&#039;s about a candidate demonstrating that they truly care about the actual job they are running for and the constituents they SAY they are eager to serve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t like the idea of appointed replacements either. But I think some less expensive options to a full-scale election (with the concurrent extra-low turnout, too!)ought to be considered, like an expedited mail-in election. Maybe candidates get a month to collect 5k signatures, and then there&#8217;s a run-off, by mail (saving dough on all that show up at the local VFW stuff) and then the top 2 have a run-off 2 weeks later. Or maybe we force the state senate to figure it out.</p>
<p>Further, I think it&#8217;s a good idea to come up with some sort of penalty for elected officials who bail for greener pastures. At minimum, we should expect them to sign a pledge to serve their full term and at minimum NOT launch a campaign for another office any time soon after getting re-elected. If you are elected to a 6 year term, you should be willing to promise to serve a minimum of 3 years beofr looking toward the exit. To me, it&#8217;s about a candidate demonstrating that they truly care about the actual job they are running for and the constituents they SAY they are eager to serve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/26/russ-feingold-wants-to-end-governor-appointed-senators/comment-page-1/#comment-435587</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=12984#comment-435587</guid>
		<description>Feingold is on to something, I think. Granted the cost of the elections is more than the cost of appointment (Blagojevich&#039;s case excepted), it is better to have elections where the democratic will of the people is reflected. In theory, this is great.

I only wonder how difficult it will be to have 37 (right?) states ratify this amendment, beyond it getting stonewalled in the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feingold is on to something, I think. Granted the cost of the elections is more than the cost of appointment (Blagojevich&#8217;s case excepted), it is better to have elections where the democratic will of the people is reflected. In theory, this is great.</p>
<p>I only wonder how difficult it will be to have 37 (right?) states ratify this amendment, beyond it getting stonewalled in the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

