<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: R.I.P John Updike</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/comment-page-1/#comment-436118</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13036#comment-436118</guid>
		<description>I was inspired by this article. Less than a week before he died, I was randomly thinking about his poem &#039;January&#039; and remembering when I was in 8th grade English class and chose to memorize it for fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was inspired by this article. Less than a week before he died, I was randomly thinking about his poem &#8216;January&#8217; and remembering when I was in 8th grade English class and chose to memorize it for fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: coffee</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/comment-page-1/#comment-435782</link>
		<dc:creator>coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13036#comment-435782</guid>
		<description>John Updike&#039;s passing is sad, but he left a ton of awesome work.  &quot;Immortality is nontransferrable&quot; he said appropriately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Updike&#8217;s passing is sad, but he left a ton of awesome work.  &#8220;Immortality is nontransferrable&#8221; he said appropriately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latecomer</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/comment-page-1/#comment-435742</link>
		<dc:creator>Latecomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13036#comment-435742</guid>
		<description>The age old debate of literary versus popular.

We need to correct the misconception that &#039;literary&#039; always implies &#039;intelligent/serious&#039;, while &#039;popular&#039; is a synonym for &#039;shallow/dumb&#039;.

It is imperative that artist speak the language of the age in which they live, regardless of the message they convey through their works. It is very possible to construct a &#039;literary&#039; work in a contemporary way. The scholar Thomas Cahill has demonstrated this in a very fluent way with his &quot;Hinges of History&quot; series, which deals with ancient historical facts and issues, but which anyone can pick up and read.

In the end knowledge must be made accessible (&#039;popular&#039;) to the wider populace if it&#039;s going to have any meaningful impact on society.

By the way, Stephen King&#039;s &quot;The Stand&quot; is an all-time classic by any standards...at least in my dictionary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The age old debate of literary versus popular.</p>
<p>We need to correct the misconception that &#8216;literary&#8217; always implies &#8216;intelligent/serious&#8217;, while &#8216;popular&#8217; is a synonym for &#8216;shallow/dumb&#8217;.</p>
<p>It is imperative that artist speak the language of the age in which they live, regardless of the message they convey through their works. It is very possible to construct a &#8216;literary&#8217; work in a contemporary way. The scholar Thomas Cahill has demonstrated this in a very fluent way with his &#8220;Hinges of History&#8221; series, which deals with ancient historical facts and issues, but which anyone can pick up and read.</p>
<p>In the end knowledge must be made accessible (&#8216;popular&#8217;) to the wider populace if it&#8217;s going to have any meaningful impact on society.</p>
<p>By the way, Stephen King&#8217;s &#8220;The Stand&#8221; is an all-time classic by any standards&#8230;at least in my dictionary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/comment-page-1/#comment-435666</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13036#comment-435666</guid>
		<description>I know Updike at least as much for his essays. A giant for sure, even if I couldn&#039;t get through one of his Rabbit books recently, as it seemed quite dated.

You bring up a question of great interest to me. What literature/books/fictional art of the current generation will stand the test of time? There&#039;s a traditional schism between literature and pop fiction, and generally the snobbish academy  looks askance at popular success. But the greatest artists transcend this schism and manage to do both. 

Will the academy of critics and college professors be able to preserve their status as gatekeepers of the alleged canon into this century, or will this deteriorate more and more? As one with a BA in English and and MA in critical thinking, I wonder. Working in publishing, I&#039;ve often encountered works that recieve academy approval yet are just dreadfully precious, pretentious stuff that fails to transcend concept and exercise and provide genuine artful insight. My opinionis that audience matters. It must. The most important insight of any art lacks utility if that insight can not be communicated well enough for more than a handful to grasp.

With the now common transition of entertaining fiction writing into film, I think it&#039;s likely that someone like Stephen King is going to stand some sort of test of time, even if the future members of the snob academy relegate him to 2nd tier status for working in both pop and in horror, as with Poe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know Updike at least as much for his essays. A giant for sure, even if I couldn&#8217;t get through one of his Rabbit books recently, as it seemed quite dated.</p>
<p>You bring up a question of great interest to me. What literature/books/fictional art of the current generation will stand the test of time? There&#8217;s a traditional schism between literature and pop fiction, and generally the snobbish academy  looks askance at popular success. But the greatest artists transcend this schism and manage to do both. </p>
<p>Will the academy of critics and college professors be able to preserve their status as gatekeepers of the alleged canon into this century, or will this deteriorate more and more? As one with a BA in English and and MA in critical thinking, I wonder. Working in publishing, I&#8217;ve often encountered works that recieve academy approval yet are just dreadfully precious, pretentious stuff that fails to transcend concept and exercise and provide genuine artful insight. My opinionis that audience matters. It must. The most important insight of any art lacks utility if that insight can not be communicated well enough for more than a handful to grasp.</p>
<p>With the now common transition of entertaining fiction writing into film, I think it&#8217;s likely that someone like Stephen King is going to stand some sort of test of time, even if the future members of the snob academy relegate him to 2nd tier status for working in both pop and in horror, as with Poe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/01/27/rip-john-updike/comment-page-1/#comment-435663</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13036#comment-435663</guid>
		<description>Sad to see such a great talent pass.  And in the defense of Mr. King, he&#039;s won several literary awards and has acted as editor on several very serious literary efforts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to see such a great talent pass.  And in the defense of Mr. King, he&#8217;s won several literary awards and has acted as editor on several very serious literary efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

