<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More On Pajamas Media Business Model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TBogg &#187; Amway of the Intertubes</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-562401</link>
		<dc:creator>TBogg &#187; Amway of the Intertubes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-562401</guid>
		<description>[...] at Donklephant has some interesting thoughts on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Donklephant has some interesting thoughts on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Licht</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-436062</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Licht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-436062</guid>
		<description>Did Joe the Plumber Kill Pajamas Media?

Have CSI examine the evidence at http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/did-joe-the-plumber-kill-pajamas-media/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Joe the Plumber Kill Pajamas Media?</p>
<p>Have CSI examine the evidence at <a href="http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/did-joe-the-plumber-kill-pajamas-media/" >http://notionscapital.wordpress.com/2009/02/02/did-joe-the-plumber-kill-pajamas-media/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ding, Dong, The Witch Is Dead!</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-436044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ding, Dong, The Witch Is Dead!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-436044</guid>
		<description>[...] clever number-cruncher over at Donklephant says Pajamas Media&#8217;s business model was hamstrung by the fact that it was, and I&#8217;m [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] clever number-cruncher over at Donklephant says Pajamas Media&#8217;s business model was hamstrung by the fact that it was, and I&#8217;m [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twilight of the Clods &#171; The Opinion Mill</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-436022</link>
		<dc:creator>Twilight of the Clods &#171; The Opinion Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-436022</guid>
		<description>[...] blogger ranks is chortling about the woes of the wingnut web: Dignity Pants Media is switching from one losing business model to another, losier model (i.e., expecting people to pay for something they didn&#8217;t even want when it was free); and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogger ranks is chortling about the woes of the wingnut web: Dignity Pants Media is switching from one losing business model to another, losier model (i.e., expecting people to pay for something they didn&#8217;t even want when it was free); and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Lindeskog</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-436010</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Lindeskog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-436010</guid>
		<description>Justin Gardner,

I belong to the long tail of the PJ network. I used an excerpt from your post in my latest post, Pajamas Media and Blogads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin Gardner,</p>
<p>I belong to the long tail of the PJ network. I used an excerpt from your post in my latest post, Pajamas Media and Blogads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Strummer</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-436009</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Strummer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-436009</guid>
		<description>I think $2 per 1000 ad impressions for Instapundit maybe what they paid him, but not what they could possibly claim to get from an advertiser.  In other words, it&#039;s clear they weren&#039;t making any profit, and losing a lot of the equity they&#039;d gotten from the venture capitalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think $2 per 1000 ad impressions for Instapundit maybe what they paid him, but not what they could possibly claim to get from an advertiser.  In other words, it&#8217;s clear they weren&#8217;t making any profit, and losing a lot of the equity they&#8217;d gotten from the venture capitalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Tim Channel</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-435995</link>
		<dc:creator>The Tim Channel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-435995</guid>
		<description>Little too much like watching sausage being made for my tastes.  I don&#039;t question your math as I have not researched ad rates vis-a-vis traffic, but it&#039;s all rather pointless.

At the end of the day we&#039;re left wondering, &quot;Is this just another of the many Republican rip-offs and con games we&#039;ve all come to expect?&quot;  Well, some of us are left wondering.  I&#039;m pretty sure that whenever there&#039;s a Republican involved, there is likely some form of criminality or sexual licentiousness afoot.  It&#039;s how they roll.

Enjoy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little too much like watching sausage being made for my tastes.  I don&#8217;t question your math as I have not researched ad rates vis-a-vis traffic, but it&#8217;s all rather pointless.</p>
<p>At the end of the day we&#8217;re left wondering, &#8220;Is this just another of the many Republican rip-offs and con games we&#8217;ve all come to expect?&#8221;  Well, some of us are left wondering.  I&#8217;m pretty sure that whenever there&#8217;s a Republican involved, there is likely some form of criminality or sexual licentiousness afoot.  It&#8217;s how they roll.</p>
<p>Enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/02/more-on-pajamas-media-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-435986</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13140#comment-435986</guid>
		<description>They took venture money. 

$200,000 annual profit is totally unacceptable to a VC. They are not looking for a sustainable business model. They&#039;re not looking to build a community.

They want a home run.

If the PJM board of directors got shown this kind of result, there is no doubt in my mind what happened next. &quot;Where&#039;s the growth model? Where&#039;s the revolution in online media you promised us?&quot;

And most importantly, &quot;What&#039;s our exit strategy?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They took venture money. </p>
<p>$200,000 annual profit is totally unacceptable to a VC. They are not looking for a sustainable business model. They&#8217;re not looking to build a community.</p>
<p>They want a home run.</p>
<p>If the PJM board of directors got shown this kind of result, there is no doubt in my mind what happened next. &#8220;Where&#8217;s the growth model? Where&#8217;s the revolution in online media you promised us?&#8221;</p>
<p>And most importantly, &#8220;What&#8217;s our exit strategy?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

