<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama&#8217;s Weekly Address For 2/7/09</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/02/08/obamas-weekly-address-for-2709/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/08/obamas-weekly-address-for-2709/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:33:07 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/08/obamas-weekly-address-for-2709/comment-page-1/#comment-436302</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13351#comment-436302</guid>
		<description>Porkulus!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porkulus!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reba Gutin-Hassett</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/08/obamas-weekly-address-for-2709/comment-page-1/#comment-436276</link>
		<dc:creator>Reba Gutin-Hassett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 01:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13351#comment-436276</guid>
		<description>42% in tax cuts is not stimulus. Cutting funds for States &amp; Cities in such need is a recipe for failure. President Obama go back to your original plan, let the Republicans filibuster. The American people should see them for the obstructionists that they are. They have no interest in compromising at this time and don&#039;t appreciate your attempt at bipartisanship. If the stimulus bill that passes is structured to create jobs &amp; takes the burden off the American people that are suffering, the Republicans in Congress will reach across the aisle towards you. I heard a speech you made last week in which you criticized the policies of tax cuts over the last eight years. How can you support this bill before Congress as it stands? You said stimulus means spending not cutting! You should be listening to the best economist who are calling for an even larger stimulus package instead of the politicians that worked with George Bush to bring us to the point of disaster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>42% in tax cuts is not stimulus. Cutting funds for States &amp; Cities in such need is a recipe for failure. President Obama go back to your original plan, let the Republicans filibuster. The American people should see them for the obstructionists that they are. They have no interest in compromising at this time and don&#8217;t appreciate your attempt at bipartisanship. If the stimulus bill that passes is structured to create jobs &amp; takes the burden off the American people that are suffering, the Republicans in Congress will reach across the aisle towards you. I heard a speech you made last week in which you criticized the policies of tax cuts over the last eight years. How can you support this bill before Congress as it stands? You said stimulus means spending not cutting! You should be listening to the best economist who are calling for an even larger stimulus package instead of the politicians that worked with George Bush to bring us to the point of disaster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody Beers</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/08/obamas-weekly-address-for-2709/comment-page-1/#comment-436274</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody Beers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13351#comment-436274</guid>
		<description>Thanks for maintaining hope in the midst of opposition.  
There are probably things that could still be cut out, but we surely don&#039;t need more tax cuts.  What we most need is whatever can quickly give jobs to those who have lost theirs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for maintaining hope in the midst of opposition.<br />
There are probably things that could still be cut out, but we surely don&#8217;t need more tax cuts.  What we most need is whatever can quickly give jobs to those who have lost theirs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
