<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Happened Last Fall To Our Banking System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UNDO: The Kanjorski Catastrophe</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-436550</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; UNDO: The Kanjorski Catastrophe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13442#comment-436550</guid>
		<description>[...] recent days some misinformation was widely circulated on the &#8216;tubes, (including this blog) regarding the circumstances of the banking system crisis last fall. The information in question is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent days some misinformation was widely circulated on the &#8216;tubes, (including this blog) regarding the circumstances of the banking system crisis last fall. The information in question is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-436415</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13442#comment-436415</guid>
		<description>Gerry, I just don&#039;t see it as either or, do or don&#039;t. The current dynamic is the one under which the current bill gets IMproved before it gets A-proved.

I know there are SOME folks who have said and are saying we ought not to do anything. I&#039;m not one of them, and I don&#039;t think this contingent is the majority.

At the end of all this, a bill will get passed, and it will primarily reflect the approach of democrats, which is understandable, and maybe even acceptable if the alternative is to watch the ship sink. That doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t be regrettable in many aspects, including aspects which could have been avoided with a little more focus, a little more common sense, and a little bit less haste.

I continue to believe that much of what is in this bill does a very poor job of altering current conditions to foster new growth. For example, if a new government program grants 2 billion dollars to encourage lets say high speed rail, after the 2 billion is spent, have conditions progressed to the point where something happens that doesn&#039;t involve the government poring even more money into the effort?stopping small

Contrast that with the 15k tax credit for qualified home purchasers, which I believe is currently in the bill. That&#039;s going to improve the RE market by reducing the stock of homes held by banks and increase the number of people with sound mortgages of houses they bought at a price that reflects current valuation.

As regards TARP, I think it&#039;s a mistake to do as you do in conflating the guarantee of money market accounts with the rushed bill as a whole. Like I said before, I don&#039;t recall anyone saying the money market guarantee was a mistake. It stopped the run on funds. It may not have even cost us anything, or anything much. Once the run stopped, values stabilized. Handing out giant piles of money to struggling banks who now can&#039;t account for that money is a horse of another color entirely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerry, I just don&#8217;t see it as either or, do or don&#8217;t. The current dynamic is the one under which the current bill gets IMproved before it gets A-proved.</p>
<p>I know there are SOME folks who have said and are saying we ought not to do anything. I&#8217;m not one of them, and I don&#8217;t think this contingent is the majority.</p>
<p>At the end of all this, a bill will get passed, and it will primarily reflect the approach of democrats, which is understandable, and maybe even acceptable if the alternative is to watch the ship sink. That doesn&#8217;t mean it won&#8217;t be regrettable in many aspects, including aspects which could have been avoided with a little more focus, a little more common sense, and a little bit less haste.</p>
<p>I continue to believe that much of what is in this bill does a very poor job of altering current conditions to foster new growth. For example, if a new government program grants 2 billion dollars to encourage lets say high speed rail, after the 2 billion is spent, have conditions progressed to the point where something happens that doesn&#8217;t involve the government poring even more money into the effort?stopping small</p>
<p>Contrast that with the 15k tax credit for qualified home purchasers, which I believe is currently in the bill. That&#8217;s going to improve the RE market by reducing the stock of homes held by banks and increase the number of people with sound mortgages of houses they bought at a price that reflects current valuation.</p>
<p>As regards TARP, I think it&#8217;s a mistake to do as you do in conflating the guarantee of money market accounts with the rushed bill as a whole. Like I said before, I don&#8217;t recall anyone saying the money market guarantee was a mistake. It stopped the run on funds. It may not have even cost us anything, or anything much. Once the run stopped, values stabilized. Handing out giant piles of money to struggling banks who now can&#8217;t account for that money is a horse of another color entirely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why The Geithner Plan Makes Sense</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-436402</link>
		<dc:creator>Donklephant &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why The Geithner Plan Makes Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13442#comment-436402</guid>
		<description>[...] And to that point, I hope you realize that gauging &#8220;Wall Street&#8217;s reaction&#8221; to Geithner&#8217;s plan is the height of cluelessness (yes, I&#8217;m talking to you Matt Drudge) given that, well&#8230;you know&#8230;Wall Street nearly caused a complete worldwide financial meltdown. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And to that point, I hope you realize that gauging &#8220;Wall Street&#8217;s reaction&#8221; to Geithner&#8217;s plan is the height of cluelessness (yes, I&#8217;m talking to you Matt Drudge) given that, well&#8230;you know&#8230;Wall Street nearly caused a complete worldwide financial meltdown. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gerryf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-436397</link>
		<dc:creator>gerryf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13442#comment-436397</guid>
		<description>Kranky,

Hard to knock a guy who works in a Meatloaf reference like that...

Well, what is it gonna be? You can either let the free market work, or not.

While no one is knocking the Feds move in September NOW, there were indeed people bashing it THEN. Let the free market work! They yelled.

You are seeing it now in hindsight and not seeing things as they were then--I cannot say you were critical then, but there were a lot of people.  

Now, there are a lot of people critical of TARP NOW, (me too) but there were very few critical then. Obviously, a lot of what we&#039;ve seen done with TARP funds is something we can be critical of, but even I who was critical of it from the beginning cannot say with certainty that passing it was the wrong thing to do--it congress had not approved it and Bush signed it, the end result might have been far worse.

And now we have the Stimulus Bill--here&#039;s the only package that people have actually spent some time working and people are bashing it based on a relatively small portion of programs deemed as unneeded (meanwhile, the Senate compromise stripped out a lot of things I think were important).

We&#039;ve got the GOP wind machine trying to whip people into a frenzy, we&#039;ve got free marketeers saying let the market work (never mind there is no free market except in the minds of free marketeers), we&#039;ve got executives laying people off all over the place, and we&#039;ve got the markets in a tizzy with all the uncertainty.

Granted, I am in favor of the stimulus plan--even those things that people are trying to argue are not stimulus, but all I can think of when I hear people saying let&#039;s not do anything is, &quot;Nero played while Rome burned.....didn&#039;t he?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kranky,</p>
<p>Hard to knock a guy who works in a Meatloaf reference like that&#8230;</p>
<p>Well, what is it gonna be? You can either let the free market work, or not.</p>
<p>While no one is knocking the Feds move in September NOW, there were indeed people bashing it THEN. Let the free market work! They yelled.</p>
<p>You are seeing it now in hindsight and not seeing things as they were then&#8211;I cannot say you were critical then, but there were a lot of people.  </p>
<p>Now, there are a lot of people critical of TARP NOW, (me too) but there were very few critical then. Obviously, a lot of what we&#8217;ve seen done with TARP funds is something we can be critical of, but even I who was critical of it from the beginning cannot say with certainty that passing it was the wrong thing to do&#8211;it congress had not approved it and Bush signed it, the end result might have been far worse.</p>
<p>And now we have the Stimulus Bill&#8211;here&#8217;s the only package that people have actually spent some time working and people are bashing it based on a relatively small portion of programs deemed as unneeded (meanwhile, the Senate compromise stripped out a lot of things I think were important).</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve got the GOP wind machine trying to whip people into a frenzy, we&#8217;ve got free marketeers saying let the market work (never mind there is no free market except in the minds of free marketeers), we&#8217;ve got executives laying people off all over the place, and we&#8217;ve got the markets in a tizzy with all the uncertainty.</p>
<p>Granted, I am in favor of the stimulus plan&#8211;even those things that people are trying to argue are not stimulus, but all I can think of when I hear people saying let&#8217;s not do anything is, &#8220;Nero played while Rome burned&#8230;..didn&#8217;t he?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Crossed Pond &#187; The Run on the Banks that Almost Was?</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-436372</link>
		<dc:creator>The Crossed Pond &#187; The Run on the Banks that Almost Was?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13442#comment-436372</guid>
		<description>[...] says one congressman, via Donklephant:  I was there when the secretary and the chairman of the Federal Reserve came those days and talked [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] says one congressman, via Donklephant:  I was there when the secretary and the chairman of the Federal Reserve came those days and talked [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/10/what-happened-last-fall-to-our-banking-system/comment-page-1/#comment-436370</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13442#comment-436370</guid>
		<description>Your back-patting rant speaks specifically to one particular policy move, the guarantee of money market accounts against a run on them by worried account holders. That made a ton of sense. 

I don&#039;t recall anyone saying that was a bad move. Anyone who has seen &lt;i&gt;It&#039;s a Wonderful Life&lt;/i&gt; with Jimmy Stewart gets this.

This policy move on money market accounts simply does not speak AT ALL to the issue of how large the current stimulus bill ought to be, or what things ought to and ought not to be included. I repeat: NOT AT ALL. 

You argument lacks any logical coherence. One obvious and sensible policy component among many things quickly undertaken during the past crisis was indeed wise. But this action does not show that current proposed actions are equally wise, or even wise at all.

I am fine with the simple contention that congress and our President ought to act &lt;i&gt;with all deliberate speed.&lt;/i&gt; That means that they should move as quickly as they can without letting speed overwhelm the need for judgement.  This really ought to be a trivial insight, Justin. The only judgement you seem capable of making is that you are scared witless. That makes you a lousy captain. Scared? OK. Scared witless? Not ok.

You&#039;re singing the female vocal lead in &quot;Paradise by the Dashboard Light&quot;: &quot;I gotta know right now, do you love me, will you love me forever....&quot;

That casts future generations in the role of praying for the end of time to hurry up and arrive. Becuase that&#039;s roundabout when we&#039;ll pay off our debt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your back-patting rant speaks specifically to one particular policy move, the guarantee of money market accounts against a run on them by worried account holders. That made a ton of sense. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t recall anyone saying that was a bad move. Anyone who has seen <i>It&#8217;s a Wonderful Life</i> with Jimmy Stewart gets this.</p>
<p>This policy move on money market accounts simply does not speak AT ALL to the issue of how large the current stimulus bill ought to be, or what things ought to and ought not to be included. I repeat: NOT AT ALL. </p>
<p>You argument lacks any logical coherence. One obvious and sensible policy component among many things quickly undertaken during the past crisis was indeed wise. But this action does not show that current proposed actions are equally wise, or even wise at all.</p>
<p>I am fine with the simple contention that congress and our President ought to act <i>with all deliberate speed.</i> That means that they should move as quickly as they can without letting speed overwhelm the need for judgement.  This really ought to be a trivial insight, Justin. The only judgement you seem capable of making is that you are scared witless. That makes you a lousy captain. Scared? OK. Scared witless? Not ok.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re singing the female vocal lead in &#8220;Paradise by the Dashboard Light&#8221;: &#8220;I gotta know right now, do you love me, will you love me forever&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>That casts future generations in the role of praying for the end of time to hurry up and arrive. Becuase that&#8217;s roundabout when we&#8217;ll pay off our debt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

