<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote Of The Day &#8211; On Bank Nationalization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/02/18/quote-of-the-day-on-bank-nationalization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/18/quote-of-the-day-on-bank-nationalization/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snarkless J. Harden</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/18/quote-of-the-day-on-bank-nationalization/comment-page-1/#comment-436693</link>
		<dc:creator>Snarkless J. Harden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13631#comment-436693</guid>
		<description>QUOTE OF THE DAY:

&quot;When business in the United States underwent a mild contraction...the Federal Reserve created more paper reserves in the hope of forestalling any pssible bank reserve shortage.  The &quot;Fed&quot; succeeded;...but it nearly destroyed the economies of the world, in the process.  The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the economy spilled over into the stock market--triggering a fantastic speculative boom.  Belatedly, Federal Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess reserves and finally succeeded in breaking the boom.  But it was too late:...the speculative imbalances had become so overwhelming that the attempt precipitated a sharp retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business confidence.  As a result, the American economy collapsed.&quot; -- Alan Greenspan, &quot;Gold and Economic Freedom&quot;, The Objectivist, 1966.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QUOTE OF THE DAY:</p>
<p>&#8220;When business in the United States underwent a mild contraction&#8230;the Federal Reserve created more paper reserves in the hope of forestalling any pssible bank reserve shortage.  The &#8220;Fed&#8221; succeeded;&#8230;but it nearly destroyed the economies of the world, in the process.  The excess credit which the Fed pumped into the economy spilled over into the stock market&#8211;triggering a fantastic speculative boom.  Belatedly, Federal Reserve officials attempted to sop up the excess reserves and finally succeeded in breaking the boom.  But it was too late:&#8230;the speculative imbalances had become so overwhelming that the attempt precipitated a sharp retrenching and a consequent demoralizing of business confidence.  As a result, the American economy collapsed.&#8221; &#8212; Alan Greenspan, &#8220;Gold and Economic Freedom&#8221;, The Objectivist, 1966.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/02/18/quote-of-the-day-on-bank-nationalization/comment-page-1/#comment-436679</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=13631#comment-436679</guid>
		<description>If the banks aren&#039;t acting with the top priority of establishing a new equilibrium for the economy, due to what makes sense for the banks themselves, then this alternative has to be strongly considered.

It&#039;s useful and instructive to all of us that some folks are approaching this in what I would call a non-ideological fashion. I&#039;m tempted to call it promising and encouraging, But let&#039;s face it, if even a few well known Republicans are seriously considering such an approach, that speaks to how poorly the system is functioning under current circumstances. So while it&#039;s encouraging from the perspective of meeting current challenges, it&#039;s not very encouraging from the perspective of gauging how big those challenges are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the banks aren&#8217;t acting with the top priority of establishing a new equilibrium for the economy, due to what makes sense for the banks themselves, then this alternative has to be strongly considered.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s useful and instructive to all of us that some folks are approaching this in what I would call a non-ideological fashion. I&#8217;m tempted to call it promising and encouraging, But let&#8217;s face it, if even a few well known Republicans are seriously considering such an approach, that speaks to how poorly the system is functioning under current circumstances. So while it&#8217;s encouraging from the perspective of meeting current challenges, it&#8217;s not very encouraging from the perspective of gauging how big those challenges are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

