<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Has Chance to Curtail McCain-Feingold</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/supreme-court-has-chance-to-curtail-mccain-feingold/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/supreme-court-has-chance-to-curtail-mccain-feingold/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/supreme-court-has-chance-to-curtail-mccain-feingold/comment-page-1/#comment-438420</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14158#comment-438420</guid>
		<description>If it gets struck down, I seriously doubt any of us would really miss it.

The thing with a movie like this one is that its very unlikely to make up very many minds. For all the resources, angst, and anger that go in to them , they mostly end up being preaching to the faithful.

Seriously, who is going to watch a lengthy one-sided screed against someone like Hillary Clinton but someone who is already a hater?

I don&#039;t doubt that much of McC-F was well-intentioned, but I don&#039;t think it hit the mark, and I really don&#039;t like imagining where this could be headed. I imagine armies of the opposing faithful patrolling youtube and initiating lawsuits. Yikes!

Put me firmly in the &quot;more speech&quot; camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it gets struck down, I seriously doubt any of us would really miss it.</p>
<p>The thing with a movie like this one is that its very unlikely to make up very many minds. For all the resources, angst, and anger that go in to them , they mostly end up being preaching to the faithful.</p>
<p>Seriously, who is going to watch a lengthy one-sided screed against someone like Hillary Clinton but someone who is already a hater?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t doubt that much of McC-F was well-intentioned, but I don&#8217;t think it hit the mark, and I really don&#8217;t like imagining where this could be headed. I imagine armies of the opposing faithful patrolling youtube and initiating lawsuits. Yikes!</p>
<p>Put me firmly in the &#8220;more speech&#8221; camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/supreme-court-has-chance-to-curtail-mccain-feingold/comment-page-1/#comment-438409</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14158#comment-438409</guid>
		<description>Yeah...those nasty, evil corporations!!  Screw them!!  All hail MoveOn.org, ACORN, George Soros, etc!!

Perhaps, if the media would do their jobs, these fringe groups (on either side) would not have the influence that they currently have.

If the media were truly unbiased and objective - meaning, they actually investigated matters, asked hard questions, impartially vetted candidates (instead of being cheerleaders) and reported facts (instead of opinions disguised as facts)....MAYBE then the people would be able to decide for themselves.  Then, the hacks from either side would marginalized and irrelevant.

It&#039;s a sad state of affairs when &quot;journalists&quot; are no more than &quot;novelists&quot; with short attention spans....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230;those nasty, evil corporations!!  Screw them!!  All hail MoveOn.org, ACORN, George Soros, etc!!</p>
<p>Perhaps, if the media would do their jobs, these fringe groups (on either side) would not have the influence that they currently have.</p>
<p>If the media were truly unbiased and objective &#8211; meaning, they actually investigated matters, asked hard questions, impartially vetted candidates (instead of being cheerleaders) and reported facts (instead of opinions disguised as facts)&#8230;.MAYBE then the people would be able to decide for themselves.  Then, the hacks from either side would marginalized and irrelevant.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a sad state of affairs when &#8220;journalists&#8221; are no more than &#8220;novelists&#8221; with short attention spans&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/03/24/supreme-court-has-chance-to-curtail-mccain-feingold/comment-page-1/#comment-438385</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14158#comment-438385</guid>
		<description>Absolutely. Nothing is more important than making certain that corporations can spend any amount of money they want on any form of political &quot;speech&quot; and be able to hide their identities behind groups like Citizens United. You did realize that is the goal of the lawyers representing Citizens United, didn&#039;t you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely. Nothing is more important than making certain that corporations can spend any amount of money they want on any form of political &#8220;speech&#8221; and be able to hide their identities behind groups like Citizens United. You did realize that is the goal of the lawyers representing Citizens United, didn&#8217;t you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

