<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Overwhelmingly Passes National Service Expansion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442782</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442782</guid>
		<description>Well, we all like bright lines and clear categories when we can find them. But in the modern world, there are plenty of &quot;volunteers&quot; who do things for altruistic and or personal reasons for very little compensation. So I think it&#039;s a bit of an overstatement to say it drains &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; relevant content out of it.

For example, our soldiers comprise what many like to refer to as a volunteer army. Would you say this drains out all the relevant content? That our soldiers receive room, board, and low wages diminishes their sacrifices by very little, wouldn&#039;t you agree? 

Since we are far more likely to see MORE low compensation/stipend level volunteerism in the future, I think we&#039;re better off thinking of it in terms of &quot;pollluted altrusism&quot; than pining for a bright line between categories. I think that ship has largely sailed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we all like bright lines and clear categories when we can find them. But in the modern world, there are plenty of &#8220;volunteers&#8221; who do things for altruistic and or personal reasons for very little compensation. So I think it&#8217;s a bit of an overstatement to say it drains <i>all</i> relevant content out of it.</p>
<p>For example, our soldiers comprise what many like to refer to as a volunteer army. Would you say this drains out all the relevant content? That our soldiers receive room, board, and low wages diminishes their sacrifices by very little, wouldn&#8217;t you agree? </p>
<p>Since we are far more likely to see MORE low compensation/stipend level volunteerism in the future, I think we&#8217;re better off thinking of it in terms of &#8220;pollluted altrusism&#8221; than pining for a bright line between categories. I think that ship has largely sailed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442776</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 17:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442776</guid>
		<description>Justin, it&#039;s thinking like &quot;measly $6 billion&quot; that has us in the financial situation our country is in.  Can you honestly say that $6 billion wouldn&#039;t be better spent elsewhere, or not spent at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin, it&#8217;s thinking like &#8220;measly $6 billion&#8221; that has us in the financial situation our country is in.  Can you honestly say that $6 billion wouldn&#8217;t be better spent elsewhere, or not spent at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442766</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442766</guid>
		<description>KK, that&#039;s exactly right. If you&#039;re paid, you aren&#039;t a volunteer in the sense of that term applicable to charities and public service. If, alternatively, we expand the definition of &quot;volunteer&quot; by substituting another sense of the term - &lt;i&gt;having agreed&lt;/i&gt; to perform a given task - then we&#039;ve drained all the relevant content out of it (&lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; job is a &quot;volunteer&quot; job if all that is meant is that the person taking it chose to do so).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KK, that&#8217;s exactly right. If you&#8217;re paid, you aren&#8217;t a volunteer in the sense of that term applicable to charities and public service. If, alternatively, we expand the definition of &#8220;volunteer&#8221; by substituting another sense of the term &#8211; <i>having agreed</i> to perform a given task &#8211; then we&#8217;ve drained all the relevant content out of it (<i>any</i> job is a &#8220;volunteer&#8221; job if all that is meant is that the person taking it chose to do so).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442761</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442761</guid>
		<description>This expansion of &lt;i&gt;paid volunteerism&lt;/i&gt; is worth questioning. It pollutes altruism.

I don&#039;t quarrel with the theory as much as I do with its execution. How long has Americorps been around? What are its major accomplishments that it can point to? What areas of need has it targeted with the resources that it has consumed and thereby diminished these problems?

 I&#039;m really asking. Can supporters point to something more than things like building character and participating in programs? Is there any data that suggests that Americorps efforts have led to a measurable and substantial mitigation of any problem it has sought to resolve?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This expansion of <i>paid volunteerism</i> is worth questioning. It pollutes altruism.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t quarrel with the theory as much as I do with its execution. How long has Americorps been around? What are its major accomplishments that it can point to? What areas of need has it targeted with the resources that it has consumed and thereby diminished these problems?</p>
<p> I&#8217;m really asking. Can supporters point to something more than things like building character and participating in programs? Is there any data that suggests that Americorps efforts have led to a measurable and substantial mitigation of any problem it has sought to resolve?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442759</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442759</guid>
		<description>Adam, Hitler also sunk money into shovel-ready infrastructure projects like the autobahns, too; is that also evidence that a President who sinks money into a shovel-ready infrastructure projects is secretly scheming to make himself fuhrer?

And isn&#039;t the &quot;illegal war&quot; nonsense a little passe at this point? It was always nonsense, but at least when Bush was in office, I understood the tiresome partisan imperative that led to its rote recitation. Now he isn&#039;t even in office, yet we&#039;re still hearing it? What do you think you&#039;re getting out of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, Hitler also sunk money into shovel-ready infrastructure projects like the autobahns, too; is that also evidence that a President who sinks money into a shovel-ready infrastructure projects is secretly scheming to make himself fuhrer?</p>
<p>And isn&#8217;t the &#8220;illegal war&#8221; nonsense a little passe at this point? It was always nonsense, but at least when Bush was in office, I understood the tiresome partisan imperative that led to its rote recitation. Now he isn&#8217;t even in office, yet we&#8217;re still hearing it? What do you think you&#8217;re getting out of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442754</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442754</guid>
		<description>Modern America is showing the patterns of pre WWII Germany. I am not exaggerating a bit. Look at the facts; The inflation in Germany before WWII was an extremely strong factor in setting the stage for the Wilhelm government to fall and Hitler to rise to power. The economic condtion of hyperinflation had political and social implications in pre-WWII Germany. Which America is talking more and more about the same scenario, where Obama&#039;s great &#039;Change&#039; will take over the world. As he says, &quot;Think not of yourself as a citizen of America, rather think of yourself as a citizen of the world.&quot; Two; Hitler&#039;s youth, don&#039;t you think is necessary to have the hearts and minds of the young people of America if you want to take control of the world?  As Hitler did before in creating his Nazi Youth, Obama will do the same, both have different names but are the SAME concept and SAME tactics used by government. Three; Americas own blitzkrieg invasions, illegal wars, toppling of governments, and nation building. READ, CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN, this is happening more everyday, and until you start being afraid for the future and actually start reading and researching history and how todays events reflect yesterdays lessons, the public will be at arms with each other, not with the real culprits who sit on the wealth of nations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Modern America is showing the patterns of pre WWII Germany. I am not exaggerating a bit. Look at the facts; The inflation in Germany before WWII was an extremely strong factor in setting the stage for the Wilhelm government to fall and Hitler to rise to power. The economic condtion of hyperinflation had political and social implications in pre-WWII Germany. Which America is talking more and more about the same scenario, where Obama&#8217;s great &#8216;Change&#8217; will take over the world. As he says, &#8220;Think not of yourself as a citizen of America, rather think of yourself as a citizen of the world.&#8221; Two; Hitler&#8217;s youth, don&#8217;t you think is necessary to have the hearts and minds of the young people of America if you want to take control of the world?  As Hitler did before in creating his Nazi Youth, Obama will do the same, both have different names but are the SAME concept and SAME tactics used by government. Three; Americas own blitzkrieg invasions, illegal wars, toppling of governments, and nation building. READ, CONFESSIONS OF AN ECONOMIC HITMAN, this is happening more everyday, and until you start being afraid for the future and actually start reading and researching history and how todays events reflect yesterdays lessons, the public will be at arms with each other, not with the real culprits who sit on the wealth of nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442748</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442748</guid>
		<description>Jacob Says: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Simon is obviously conservative- how close to the center depends on who youâ€™re comparing it against.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Precisely my point. I&#039;m not in the center, and I know it; Justin isn&#039;t either, however, and I don&#039;t think that he does know it. There&#039;s nothing wrong with being a liberal, but it becomes seriously grating to hear someone on that side acting as though anyone to their &quot;right&quot; is way out in the wings.

It&#039;s an ego fallacy: &quot;I am a reasonable person, and reasonable person must be moderates, ergo I must be a moderate.&quot; Doesn&#039;t hold. There are reasonable people on the right; there are reasonable people on the left; there are also unreasonable people in the center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob Says: </p>
<blockquote><p>Simon is obviously conservative- how close to the center depends on who youâ€™re comparing it against.</p></blockquote>
<p>Precisely my point. I&#8217;m not in the center, and I know it; Justin isn&#8217;t either, however, and I don&#8217;t think that he does know it. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with being a liberal, but it becomes seriously grating to hear someone on that side acting as though anyone to their &#8220;right&#8221; is way out in the wings.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an ego fallacy: &#8220;I am a reasonable person, and reasonable person must be moderates, ergo I must be a moderate.&#8221; Doesn&#8217;t hold. There are reasonable people on the right; there are reasonable people on the left; there are also unreasonable people in the center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442746</guid>
		<description>What I don&#039;t understand is how Simon get&#039;s to decide what the center is as opposed to what he thinks the center is. Isn&#039;t it all really relative? But Simon is obviously conservative- how close to the center depends on who you&#039;re comparing it against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I don&#8217;t understand is how Simon get&#8217;s to decide what the center is as opposed to what he thinks the center is. Isn&#8217;t it all really relative? But Simon is obviously conservative- how close to the center depends on who you&#8217;re comparing it against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loviatar</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442743</link>
		<dc:creator>Loviatar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442743</guid>
		<description>JMG,

&lt;i&gt;Why are your framing this as a left vs. right debate? And making cryptic insults at Justin?&lt;/i&gt;

Because he is a Republican/Conservative. It is as simple as that, there is no rhyme or reason to the party/movement actions right now. To the dead end believers its all about attack, attack, attack.

They&#039;ve lost any inclination to be constructive and I for one want them to continue along on this track as they will also lose any hope of returning to power any time soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JMG,</p>
<p><i>Why are your framing this as a left vs. right debate? And making cryptic insults at Justin?</i></p>
<p>Because he is a Republican/Conservative. It is as simple as that, there is no rhyme or reason to the party/movement actions right now. To the dead end believers its all about attack, attack, attack.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve lost any inclination to be constructive and I for one want them to continue along on this track as they will also lose any hope of returning to power any time soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JMG</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442733</link>
		<dc:creator>JMG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 13:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442733</guid>
		<description>Simon,

It&#039;s an expansion of the AmeriCorps program.  One that costs us $182 per volunteer, and probably gains us a lot more.  It&#039;s good economies of scale and helps people find a way help their country.   Why are your framing this as a left vs. right debate? And making cryptic insults at Justin?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an expansion of the AmeriCorps program.  One that costs us $182 per volunteer, and probably gains us a lot more.  It&#8217;s good economies of scale and helps people find a way help their country.   Why are your framing this as a left vs. right debate? And making cryptic insults at Justin?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/04/06/senate-passes-national-service-expansion-overwhelmingly/comment-page-1/#comment-442595</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 03:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14356#comment-442595</guid>
		<description>The fact that you buy into the framing of this as being about &quot;volunteering&quot; tells even a casual reader a great deal about you, Justin...

Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with being on the left, of course. The problem is when those on the left start thinking their position represents the center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that you buy into the framing of this as being about &#8220;volunteering&#8221; tells even a casual reader a great deal about you, Justin&#8230;</p>
<p>Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with being on the left, of course. The problem is when those on the left start thinking their position represents the center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

