<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Short List Revealed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:39:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obama&#8217;s Short Listâ€”Who Owes the Most Back Taxes? &#171; Cynical Synapse</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-464510</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama&#8217;s Short Listâ€”Who Owes the Most Back Taxes? &#171; Cynical Synapse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14803#comment-464510</guid>
		<description>[...] much speculation as to who President Obama will likely nominate to replace retiring Justice Souter, Donklephant commented on this short list from First [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] much speculation as to who President Obama will likely nominate to replace retiring Justice Souter, Donklephant commented on this short list from First [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Word</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-462807</link>
		<dc:creator>the Word</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 14:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14803#comment-462807</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m old enough to remember Sandra Day O&#039;Connor being criticized as unqualified. (If I remember correctly, 2 years or less) and then of course, Clarence. 

I&#039;ve been watching The American Experience and I think that there could be one hell of a case for a Native American. I think they&#039;d have a strong case that we have never followed the law in regards to our contracts with them. I think we have plenty of pro-Life Catholics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m old enough to remember Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor being criticized as unqualified. (If I remember correctly, 2 years or less) and then of course, Clarence. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been watching The American Experience and I think that there could be one hell of a case for a Native American. I think they&#8217;d have a strong case that we have never followed the law in regards to our contracts with them. I think we have plenty of pro-Life Catholics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-462796</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 13:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14803#comment-462796</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Gardner Makes Gender Political&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Oh yes. Let&#039;s dismiss all male candidates. Perhaps we ought to dismiss all white folks entirely. Anything less than a two-fer would be grossly inadequate. Ideally, we need a three-four, or even a four-fer.

Let&#039;s forget about judicial excellence as manifested in the writings and rulings of a judge. Of course, we can pay lip service to the importance of that, as long as we carefully insist that it&#039;s not as important as symbolism to cheer identity-based interest groups. If we look carefully enough, I am confident that we can find a handicapped lesbian female judge somewhere. Hopefully one with both Latino and African-American heritage.

Such a person would be the ideal choice. Unless they were pro-life. But hey, no litmus tests or anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Gardner Makes Gender Political</p></blockquote>
<p>Oh yes. Let&#8217;s dismiss all male candidates. Perhaps we ought to dismiss all white folks entirely. Anything less than a two-fer would be grossly inadequate. Ideally, we need a three-four, or even a four-fer.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s forget about judicial excellence as manifested in the writings and rulings of a judge. Of course, we can pay lip service to the importance of that, as long as we carefully insist that it&#8217;s not as important as symbolism to cheer identity-based interest groups. If we look carefully enough, I am confident that we can find a handicapped lesbian female judge somewhere. Hopefully one with both Latino and African-American heritage.</p>
<p>Such a person would be the ideal choice. Unless they were pro-life. But hey, no litmus tests or anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silent Cal</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-462773</link>
		<dc:creator>Silent Cal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 10:54:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14803#comment-462773</guid>
		<description>Is Granholm&#039;s Canadian birth that big of a stumbling block? There have been foreign-born Justices before, including Frankfurter, whom the left adores to this day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Granholm&#8217;s Canadian birth that big of a stumbling block? There have been foreign-born Justices before, including Frankfurter, whom the left adores to this day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mule Breath</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/05/11/supreme-court-short-list-revealed/comment-page-1/#comment-462746</link>
		<dc:creator>Mule Breath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 02:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=14803#comment-462746</guid>
		<description>Kagen will be on the Supreme Court before Obama leaves office, but my money is still on Sotomayor. Failing that, Wood is the next best choice. 

I&#039;m estimating that Obama will have three apointments (possibly four) to the Court before leaving office, so all the choices will have ample opportunity for consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kagen will be on the Supreme Court before Obama leaves office, but my money is still on Sotomayor. Failing that, Wood is the next best choice. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m estimating that Obama will have three apointments (possibly four) to the Court before leaving office, so all the choices will have ample opportunity for consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
