No doubt you’ll be hearing A LOT about this decision…
Although Sotomayor has not had a case dealing directly with abortion rights, she wrote the opinion in Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, 304 F.3d 183 (2d Cir. 2002), a challenge to the â€œMexico City Policy,â€ which prohibited foreign organizations receiving U.S. funds from performing or supporting abortions. An abortion rights group (along with its attorneys) brought claimed that the policy violated its First Amendment, due process, and equal protection rights.
Relying on the Second Circuitâ€™s earlier decision in Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Agency for International Development, which dealt with a virtually identical claim, Sotomayorâ€™s opinion rejected the groupâ€™s First Amendment claim on the merits. Turning to the plaintiffsâ€™ due process claim, Sotomayor held that they lacked standing because they alleged only a harm to foreign organizations, rather than themselves.
Sotomayor held that the plaintiffs did have standing with regard to their equal protection claim, but she ultimately held that the claim failed under rational basis review because the government â€œis free to favor the anti-abortion position over the pro-choice positionâ€ with public funds.
This could actually diffuse the only real hot button issue Republicans have, although one can’t help but think they’ll be asking a lot of questions about privacy rights, etc.
More as it develops…
This entry was posted on Tuesday, May 26th, 2009 and is filed under Barack, Law, Obama, Republicans, Supreme Court. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.