<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quote Of The Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/06/19/quote-of-the-day-77/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/19/quote-of-the-day-77/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/19/quote-of-the-day-77/comment-page-1/#comment-489163</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15265#comment-489163</guid>
		<description>Yes, Michigan did not elect this nutjob, thank god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Michigan did not elect this nutjob, thank god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/19/quote-of-the-day-77/comment-page-1/#comment-489093</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15265#comment-489093</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m no lawyer, but I don&#039;t think that fine would stand up too well in court.  Better than even chance that a judge would declare anything beyond &quot;counting people&quot; as optional.  Is there any precedent out there that indicates otherwise?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m no lawyer, but I don&#8217;t think that fine would stand up too well in court.  Better than even chance that a judge would declare anything beyond &#8220;counting people&#8221; as optional.  Is there any precedent out there that indicates otherwise?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/19/quote-of-the-day-77/comment-page-1/#comment-488996</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15265#comment-488996</guid>
		<description>Yeah you messed up your M states :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah you messed up your M states :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TerenceC</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/19/quote-of-the-day-77/comment-page-1/#comment-488985</link>
		<dc:creator>TerenceC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15265#comment-488985</guid>
		<description>Bachman os a clown and has no business in national politics. However, your post states she is a representative of Michigan which is wrong, she represents the 6th Congressional District of Minnesotta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bachman os a clown and has no business in national politics. However, your post states she is a representative of Michigan which is wrong, she represents the 6th Congressional District of Minnesotta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
