<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart On Obama&#8217;s Lack Of Transparency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:41:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Stewart on Obama&#8217;s lack of&#160;transparency &#124; MNpublius.com</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-496102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Stewart on Obama&#8217;s lack of&#160;transparency &#124; MNpublius.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-496102</guid>
		<description>[...] Donklephant.       June 29, 2009, 3:00 pm &#124; Category: Misc. National Politics &#124; Tags: Barack [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Donklephant.       June 29, 2009, 3:00 pm | Category: Misc. National Politics | Tags: Barack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim S</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-495125</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-495125</guid>
		<description>Completely Off-topic

Tully,

   I can&#039;t find your e-mail. Do you still follow KDL? If you see this and still have my e-mail drop me a note. Or do you already know the news from this morning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely Off-topic</p>
<p>Tully,</p>
<p>   I can&#8217;t find your e-mail. Do you still follow KDL? If you see this and still have my e-mail drop me a note. Or do you already know the news from this morning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletch</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-494308</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-494308</guid>
		<description>Tully-

&lt;i&gt;And I strongly suspect it wonâ€™t clear the Senate.&lt;/i&gt;

I am less optimistic than you...It won&#039;t &quot;clear&quot; in present form, but we &lt;b&gt;will&lt;/b&gt; have a Federal &quot;climate program&quot;- resulting in a decline in  America&#039;s GDP.

For every molecule of CO2 that the US doesn&#039;t emit-- China will emit an extra 2, and India will emit 1.5- and they will thank us for trashing our own economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tully-</p>
<p><i>And I strongly suspect it wonâ€™t clear the Senate.</i></p>
<p>I am less optimistic than you&#8230;It won&#8217;t &#8220;clear&#8221; in present form, but we <b>will</b> have a Federal &#8220;climate program&#8221;- resulting in a decline in  America&#8217;s GDP.</p>
<p>For every molecule of CO2 that the US doesn&#8217;t emit&#8211; China will emit an extra 2, and India will emit 1.5- and they will thank us for trashing our own economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-494235</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-494235</guid>
		<description>Fletch, much as I hate not to add it to the list, the Sunlight B4 Signing pledge doesn&#039;t kick in until it clears Senate and reconciliation. And I strongly suspect it won&#039;t clear the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fletch, much as I hate not to add it to the list, the Sunlight B4 Signing pledge doesn&#8217;t kick in until it clears Senate and reconciliation. And I strongly suspect it won&#8217;t clear the Senate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletch</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-494220</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-494220</guid>
		<description>Tully-

&lt;i&gt;The â€œSunlight Before Signingâ€ pledge has been pretty much ignored. It was broken with the first bill Obama signed.&lt;/i&gt;

How about Waxman-Markey getting a three hundred page amendment at 3 AM- and passing in the House on the same day?

Yes we can!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tully-</p>
<p><i>The â€œSunlight Before Signingâ€ pledge has been pretty much ignored. It was broken with the first bill Obama signed.</i></p>
<p>How about Waxman-Markey getting a three hundred page amendment at 3 AM- and passing in the House on the same day?</p>
<p>Yes we can!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-493968</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-493968</guid>
		<description>Lack of transparency just increased some more. 

The &quot;Sunlight Before Signing&quot; pledge has been pretty much ignored. It was broken with the first bill Obama signed. And the promise to loosen FOIA rules has likewise been ignored. And who are the &quot;powers that be&quot; that stomped flat Conyer&#039;s promised investigation of ACORN? What leverage did they use? What about the (apparently illegal) IG firings and forced resignations? The dropping of the poll-thuggery charges against the club-weilding Black Panthers in Philly? And let&#039;s not forget the Potemkin Press events.

Standard fare: Demonize the incumbent for doing certain things, then get into office and do them yourself. Or demonize the incumbent for doing things they &lt;i&gt;didn&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; actually  do, then get into office and do them yourself. 

&quot;The most transparent administration in history.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lack of transparency just increased some more. </p>
<p>The &#8220;Sunlight Before Signing&#8221; pledge has been pretty much ignored. It was broken with the first bill Obama signed. And the promise to loosen FOIA rules has likewise been ignored. And who are the &#8220;powers that be&#8221; that stomped flat Conyer&#8217;s promised investigation of ACORN? What leverage did they use? What about the (apparently illegal) IG firings and forced resignations? The dropping of the poll-thuggery charges against the club-weilding Black Panthers in Philly? And let&#8217;s not forget the Potemkin Press events.</p>
<p>Standard fare: Demonize the incumbent for doing certain things, then get into office and do them yourself. Or demonize the incumbent for doing things they <i>didn&#8217;t</i> actually  do, then get into office and do them yourself. </p>
<p>&#8220;The most transparent administration in history.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy the Dhimmi</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-493905</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy the Dhimmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-493905</guid>
		<description>My guess is that after Obama was briefed by the CIA and other intelligence agencies when he became President, he began to realize that this whole being commander-in-chief thing was a bit more complicated than he thought it would be.

Now President Obama is looking to sign an executive order authorizing the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090626/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_guantanamo_detainees&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;indefinite detention of terror suspects without trial.&lt;/a&gt;  Does Obama owe an apology to his voters, or ever to President Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My guess is that after Obama was briefed by the CIA and other intelligence agencies when he became President, he began to realize that this whole being commander-in-chief thing was a bit more complicated than he thought it would be.</p>
<p>Now President Obama is looking to sign an executive order authorizing the <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090626/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_guantanamo_detainees" rel="nofollow">indefinite detention of terror suspects without trial.</a>  Does Obama owe an apology to his voters, or ever to President Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Arvak</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/06/26/jon-stewart-on-obamas-lack-of-transparency/comment-page-1/#comment-493831</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Arvak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15367#comment-493831</guid>
		<description>Hm.  I don&#039;t think that criticizing the Bush administration for not being liberal and then criticizing the Obama administration only for not being liberal ENOUGH really counts as &quot;giving it to both sides&quot;, especially when half the piece is just recycling old Dick Cheney material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm.  I don&#8217;t think that criticizing the Bush administration for not being liberal and then criticizing the Obama administration only for not being liberal ENOUGH really counts as &#8220;giving it to both sides&#8221;, especially when half the piece is just recycling old Dick Cheney material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
