Comments on: Quote Of The Day – Stimulus Impact http://donklephant.com/2009/06/29/quote-of-the-day-stimulus-impact/ Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:28 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Drawnlines_Blog http://donklephant.com/2009/06/29/quote-of-the-day-stimulus-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-496607 Drawnlines_Blog Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:23:46 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=15387#comment-496607 Ridiculous Obamanomics. The White House's own estimates said that with or without the damn stimulus we'd be in the same place on the unemployment scale five years out. So why couldn't we just keep our grandchildren's money in their piggy banks instead of in China?! This of course is not to mention that the White House urged us to pass the stimulus on the promise that swift, bold action would keep unemployment below 8 percent. Here we are at 9.4 percent and rising! But wait, there's more! If you order right now, we'll send you not one but TWO stimulus packages. Your order will ultimately come complete with stagflation if you order within the next three years. Welcome back, Carter!!! Ridiculous Obamanomics. The White House’s own estimates said that with or without the damn stimulus we’d be in the same place on the unemployment scale five years out. So why couldn’t we just keep our grandchildren’s money in their piggy banks instead of in China?!

This of course is not to mention that the White House urged us to pass the stimulus on the promise that swift, bold action would keep unemployment below 8 percent. Here we are at 9.4 percent and rising!

But wait, there’s more! If you order right now, we’ll send you not one but TWO stimulus packages. Your order will ultimately come complete with stagflation if you order within the next three years.

Welcome back, Carter!!!

]]> By: Azhrie139 http://donklephant.com/2009/06/29/quote-of-the-day-stimulus-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-496028 Azhrie139 Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:43:05 +0000 http://donklephant.com/?p=15387#comment-496028 No offense, but this post seems like it is just phoning it in. First, little original content. Second, statement of the obvious which actually isn't relevant to the prior supposition. That is this: "If things don’t pick up in 2010, Dems better get ready for some losses in the midterms." Followed by this: "the money was always going to ramp up in the second half of 2009 and into 2010." Basically, your conclusion while true is really pretty irrelevant to the rest of the post content. No offense, but this post seems like it is just phoning it in. First, little original content. Second, statement of the obvious which actually isn’t relevant to the prior supposition.
That is this:
“If things don’t pick up in 2010, Dems better get ready for some losses in the midterms.”
Followed by this:
“the money was always going to ramp up in the second half of 2009 and into 2010.”

Basically, your conclusion while true is really pretty irrelevant to the rest of the post content.

]]>