Top 3 Biden Quotes This Week

By Jennn Fusion | Related entries in Biden, Quotes

“I am not unaware of the controversies swirling around this dinner, swirling around the speed — or lack thereof — that we’re moving on issues that are of great importance to you and, quite frankly, to me and to the president and to millions of Americans…. More importantly , I want thank you for being a critical — critical — voice for keeping the nation focused on the unfinished business of true equality for all of our people; and I know and this administration knows that we have so much more to do. I promise you, I promise you, with your help we’ll get there in this administration.”
(6/25/09, LGBT Leadership Council fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee)

Joe Biden said he had specifically requested to speak at the LGBT Leadership Council fundraiser and that his wife, Jill, is also interested in voicing her opinion on the issue. To a crowd of 180 people who paid $1,000 – $30,400 per plate to hear him speak, Biden gave a heart-felt message that the Administration is committed to making equality for gays and lesbians a priority during this term. Even though many were pleased with Biden’s message, there were hordes of protestors outside who were not pleased with the 265 gays and lesbians discharged from the military since Obama’s inauguration, which they say is a failure to follow through with campaign promises.

Read what Biden had to say about the Recovery Act & Violence Against Women here.


This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 1st, 2009 and is filed under Biden, Quotes. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Top 3 Biden Quotes This Week”

  1. kranky kritter Says:

    This is the sort of conundrum that 2-party politics inevitably produces in America, aint it?

    As an average bear, I have the luxury of noticing this:

    •members of various minority special interest groups have little real viable political choice but to pick between the 2 finalists

    • these special interests cannot reasonably expect that if their candidate wins, he or she will bake the bread to the letter of their recipe, or even close to that letter. And you won’t get the whole loaf, either.

    • So, you can either like half-loaves, quarter loaves, eighth-loaves, and sympathetic nods (whose value is a mileage issue), or you can lump them. You don’t actually get to bake your bread, just eat what is ultimately delivered. If you are very good and circumstances allow, you may get to help decide, let’s say, how many grains of salt go into the dough. Your input may not be heeded when it comes to yeast, flour, water, temperature, and so on.

    Now, I’ll cheerfully acknowledge that the fine details of these points are quite debatable. Nevertheless, I maintain that at the end of the day they are basically true. Presidents and their supporting cast of congresscritters are elected via uneasy and in fact somewhat temporary coalitions of various interest groups.

    Personally, I have little doubt where President Obama’s sympathies lie. I think he’s a modern guy who believes that life is just way too short for us to waste time wringing our hands about how granting full tolerance to gay and lesbian lifestyles might conceivably harm our culture as a hole. History so far sems to have demonstrated that as Americans they deserve all the same civil rights and civil protections and access to civil institutions that heterosexuals have.

    I believe that he also knows that he does not have the luxury to act on such beliefs to the extent that they could adversely affect his ability to keep together coalitions needed to make progress on other issues that he also feels are important. Measured against one’s ideals, such positioning may seem quite unsatisfactory, unsavory even. But it’s how powerful adults in politics manage to get things done here and there, pushing various balls a hair closer to goals that they think are worthwhile.

    That’s how we got “don’t ask, don’t tell” in the first place. This is a policy that is any idealist’s nightmare. In my mind it’s a Bill Clinton signature approach, and compared to the previous policy, it represented an improvement. It was a quarter loaf that displeased every faction.

    Now, along comes Obama, anointed as by far the greatest true hope for progressives of the last half-century. Well, sorry folks, but anyone who really let themselves believe that Barack Obama was going to turn water into wine was always going to end up sorely disappointed. This is not a fantasy nor a hollywood scripted movie. It’s 21st century politics. Not beanbag.

    So be grown-up and unsurprised if the only adjustment is to something like don’t ask, TRY not to tell.

  2. ExiledIndependent Says:

    I expect some academically inspired legal solution, such as a military tribunal established to determine if one’s gayness negatively impacts their or their comrades’ ability to perform as a soldier.

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: