<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems Divided On Second Stimulus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/07/08/dems-divided-on-second-stimulus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/08/dems-divided-on-second-stimulus/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:05:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tully</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/08/dems-divided-on-second-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-505990</link>
		<dc:creator>Tully</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15514#comment-505990</guid>
		<description>The first &quot;stimulus&quot; was little but pent-up pork and state/local gov&#039;t welfare in the first place, so I&#039;m less than startled that it was less than effective. We&#039;re still in &quot;pushing on a rope&quot; territory, and propping up state /local gov&#039;t budgets and second-tier pork projects that couldn&#039;t make cost-effectivenss criteria the first dozen times they were proposed stimulates little. More &quot;stimulus&quot; along those lines won&#039;t help. Until business investment turns back up we remain screwed, and it won&#039;t turn back up until there&#039;s a reasonable expectation in the business community that investments will provide real returns. In the meantime, all that gov&#039;t borrowing is crowding out private investment. Hey ho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first &#8220;stimulus&#8221; was little but pent-up pork and state/local gov&#8217;t welfare in the first place, so I&#8217;m less than startled that it was less than effective. We&#8217;re still in &#8220;pushing on a rope&#8221; territory, and propping up state /local gov&#8217;t budgets and second-tier pork projects that couldn&#8217;t make cost-effectivenss criteria the first dozen times they were proposed stimulates little. More &#8220;stimulus&#8221; along those lines won&#8217;t help. Until business investment turns back up we remain screwed, and it won&#8217;t turn back up until there&#8217;s a reasonable expectation in the business community that investments will provide real returns. In the meantime, all that gov&#8217;t borrowing is crowding out private investment. Hey ho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kranky kritter</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/08/dems-divided-on-second-stimulus/comment-page-1/#comment-505325</link>
		<dc:creator>kranky kritter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15514#comment-505325</guid>
		<description>If they aren&#039;t &quot;getting their story straight&quot; that means there are two stories. Which means that a substantial subset of democrats understands that the gross overspending of the last 2 budgets (Bush&#039;s last and Obama&#039;s first) has jeopardized the dollar, and that further overspending at the astonishing rates of the last 2 budgets is probably untenable.

IOW, presumably some democrats understand that spending at the levels of the last 2 budgets must stop, and must quickly trend back down at least to historical levels. That&#039;s great news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If they aren&#8217;t &#8220;getting their story straight&#8221; that means there are two stories. Which means that a substantial subset of democrats understands that the gross overspending of the last 2 budgets (Bush&#8217;s last and Obama&#8217;s first) has jeopardized the dollar, and that further overspending at the astonishing rates of the last 2 budgets is probably untenable.</p>
<p>IOW, presumably some democrats understand that spending at the levels of the last 2 budgets must stop, and must quickly trend back down at least to historical levels. That&#8217;s great news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
