<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jon Stewart Destroys Birthers Movement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/</link>
	<description>Big Teeth. Huge Ass. Surprisingly Reasonable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:03:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-526455</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:29:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-526455</guid>
		<description>Justin please tell me you&#039;re banning these last two =]

Sorry I don&#039;t really have more to contribute. Maybe an apology from the state of California for Orly. Sorry guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin please tell me you&#8217;re banning these last two =]</p>
<p>Sorry I don&#8217;t really have more to contribute. Maybe an apology from the state of California for Orly. Sorry guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-526319</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-526319</guid>
		<description>A simple question. IF Obaba is the real deal (true American) why has he and his ilk spent over a million dollars in court battles NOT to produce his
birth certificate? We&#039;re talking about the Constitution, NOT racism. The issue is why he refuses.. especially in view of his pledge to get our votes that his would be the most open and transparent government in U.S. history!

The document provided to date is now officialy a fake and the person who perpetrated it on the interned has admitted this. NO above comment mentioned THIS.

Where&#039;s the beef?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A simple question. IF Obaba is the real deal (true American) why has he and his ilk spent over a million dollars in court battles NOT to produce his<br />
birth certificate? We&#8217;re talking about the Constitution, NOT racism. The issue is why he refuses.. especially in view of his pledge to get our votes that his would be the most open and transparent government in U.S. history!</p>
<p>The document provided to date is now officialy a fake and the person who perpetrated it on the interned has admitted this. NO above comment mentioned THIS.</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the beef?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan from ohio</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-526293</link>
		<dc:creator>dan from ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-526293</guid>
		<description>I wondwer why Obama [on his first day as President] signed an Executive Order sealing his records from public scrutnity?His elementary,college,passport and birth certificate are now sealed,wonder why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wondwer why Obama [on his first day as President] signed an Executive Order sealing his records from public scrutnity?His elementary,college,passport and birth certificate are now sealed,wonder why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solomon Kleinsmith</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-523309</link>
		<dc:creator>Solomon Kleinsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-523309</guid>
		<description>I think what they are trying to yank out of you micheal is a comment somewhere in the neighborhood of:

&quot;If you polled certain segments of the black population (say... over 40 and lower on the economic spectrum) on those same 13 descriptors, they would answer much in the same way as white southerners who are also lower on the economic spectrum.&quot;

That about right guys?

My response would be that you&#039;re both right... but whats your point? These are known factors. The only thing I would say is that if either of you think that your tribe (con or lib) is less judgmental than the other, you&#039;ve got the blinders on. All ideologies come with a set of perceptual filters and different sets of traits that they judge people on.

The racist types are attracted more to the right because the conservative worldview is easier to twist in a way that includes other races as &#039;alien&#039;, and therefore, to one degree or another, bad. But the various breeds of radicals (anarchists, extreme environmentalists, antiglobalists, communists, etc) tend to be attracted to liberalism because of its knee jerk reaction to side with whoever the perceived &#039;little guy&#039; is (hence how its a negative label - for liberals - to put the word &#039;big&#039; in front of anything). Really just depends on who we consider &#039;US&#039; or &#039;THEM&#039;..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what they are trying to yank out of you micheal is a comment somewhere in the neighborhood of:</p>
<p>&#8220;If you polled certain segments of the black population (say&#8230; over 40 and lower on the economic spectrum) on those same 13 descriptors, they would answer much in the same way as white southerners who are also lower on the economic spectrum.&#8221;</p>
<p>That about right guys?</p>
<p>My response would be that you&#8217;re both right&#8230; but whats your point? These are known factors. The only thing I would say is that if either of you think that your tribe (con or lib) is less judgmental than the other, you&#8217;ve got the blinders on. All ideologies come with a set of perceptual filters and different sets of traits that they judge people on.</p>
<p>The racist types are attracted more to the right because the conservative worldview is easier to twist in a way that includes other races as &#8216;alien&#8217;, and therefore, to one degree or another, bad. But the various breeds of radicals (anarchists, extreme environmentalists, antiglobalists, communists, etc) tend to be attracted to liberalism because of its knee jerk reaction to side with whoever the perceived &#8216;little guy&#8217; is (hence how its a negative label &#8211; for liberals &#8211; to put the word &#8216;big&#8217; in front of anything). Really just depends on who we consider &#8216;US&#8217; or &#8216;THEM&#8217;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-523255</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 22:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-523255</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Fair enough. In your opinion, do the exit polls from the presidential election indicate significant race-based voting if viewed according to ethnicity? For example, are there any disproportionately large or small percentages of a given ethnicity voting for one candidate or another?&lt;/i&gt;
McCain had to win white folks. He got no love from blacks, and he got beat in the Latino community. If he does that AND loses whites he&#039;s only got 30% of the vote.

I will agree that if blacks always voted 90% for a black candidate that would racist. But they don&#039;t they go for Democrats by 90 points every time. For obvious reasons most of the time those Dems are black, but even in cases where it&#039;s a choice between a white De and a black Republican they go for the Democrat. That&#039;s why Michael Steele and Alan Keyes have won a single election between them, despite being well-financed and well-known.

Blacks support Dems in overwhelming numbers because they agree with the Dems in overwhelming numbers. They tend to be very dovish, economically liberal, and are relatively unsympathetic to law enforcement. Even relatively conservative black folks like Condi Rice and Colin Powell support Affirmative Action. I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to find out they both support hate-crimes legislation too.

BTW Tully I clicked on MR&#039;s link He&#039;s referring to a jpg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Fair enough. In your opinion, do the exit polls from the presidential election indicate significant race-based voting if viewed according to ethnicity? For example, are there any disproportionately large or small percentages of a given ethnicity voting for one candidate or another?</i><br />
McCain had to win white folks. He got no love from blacks, and he got beat in the Latino community. If he does that AND loses whites he&#8217;s only got 30% of the vote.</p>
<p>I will agree that if blacks always voted 90% for a black candidate that would racist. But they don&#8217;t they go for Democrats by 90 points every time. For obvious reasons most of the time those Dems are black, but even in cases where it&#8217;s a choice between a white De and a black Republican they go for the Democrat. That&#8217;s why Michael Steele and Alan Keyes have won a single election between them, despite being well-financed and well-known.</p>
<p>Blacks support Dems in overwhelming numbers because they agree with the Dems in overwhelming numbers. They tend to be very dovish, economically liberal, and are relatively unsympathetic to law enforcement. Even relatively conservative black folks like Condi Rice and Colin Powell support Affirmative Action. I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to find out they both support hate-crimes legislation too.</p>
<p>BTW Tully I clicked on MR&#8217;s link He&#8217;s referring to a jpg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-523214</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-523214</guid>
		<description>Exile:

Of course there were different groupings.  Blacks voted overwhelmingly for Obama.  Hispanics voted heavily for Obama.  Whites overall (I&#039;m going from memory) split.  Women of all races for Obama.  White southerners for McCain.  White mountain states for McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exile:</p>
<p>Of course there were different groupings.  Blacks voted overwhelmingly for Obama.  Hispanics voted heavily for Obama.  Whites overall (I&#8217;m going from memory) split.  Women of all races for Obama.  White southerners for McCain.  White mountain states for McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-523089</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-523089</guid>
		<description>Fair enough.  In your opinion, do the exit polls from the presidential election indicate significant race-based voting if viewed according to ethnicity?  For example, are there any disproportionately large or small percentages of a given ethnicity voting for one candidate or another?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough.  In your opinion, do the exit polls from the presidential election indicate significant race-based voting if viewed according to ethnicity?  For example, are there any disproportionately large or small percentages of a given ethnicity voting for one candidate or another?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522903</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522903</guid>
		<description>Exile:
I didn&#039;t understand your question.  Which is why I wrote &quot;in what context?&quot;  That&#039;s not an evasion, it&#039;s a request for you to clarify your question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exile:<br />
I didn&#8217;t understand your question.  Which is why I wrote &#8220;in what context?&#8221;  That&#8217;s not an evasion, it&#8217;s a request for you to clarify your question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522775</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522775</guid>
		<description>Wow, MR, you are doggedly avoiding my question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, MR, you are doggedly avoiding my question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522594</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:12:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522594</guid>
		<description>Exile:

So that you don&#039;t waste time denying that Limbaugh&#039;s a racist:

&lt;i&gt; I mean, letâ€™s face it, we didnâ€™t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. Iâ€™m not saying we should bring it back; Iâ€™m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.

You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.

 Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?

The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.&lt;/i&gt;

Feel free to deny that he speaks for the party, but that will be followed by the parade of groveling Republicans apologizing for offending Rush.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exile:</p>
<p>So that you don&#8217;t waste time denying that Limbaugh&#8217;s a racist:</p>
<p><i> I mean, letâ€™s face it, we didnâ€™t have slavery in this country for over 100 years because it was a bad thing. Quite the opposite: slavery built the South. Iâ€™m not saying we should bring it back; Iâ€™m just saying it had its merits. For one thing, the streets were safer after dark.</p>
<p>You know who deserves a posthumous Medal of Honor? James Earl Ray [the confessed assassin of Martin Luther King]. We miss you, James. Godspeed.</p>
<p> Have you ever noticed how all composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?</p>
<p>The NAACP should have riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice robberies.</i></p>
<p>Feel free to deny that he speaks for the party, but that will be followed by the parade of groveling Republicans apologizing for offending Rush.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522593</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 03:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522593</guid>
		<description>Exiled:

In what context?

I&#039;m not &quot;continuing to push the race thing.&quot;  I&#039;ve stated my belief that the birthers are racists.  I&#039;ve stated the fact -- acknowledged by anyone who knows anything about the last 40 years of American politics -- that the GOP has exploited race for electoral profit.

In fact it&#039;s the birthers who are pushing the race thing.  Portions of the GOP -- including the semi-official spokesman, Rush Limbaugh -- are pushing the race thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exiled:</p>
<p>In what context?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not &#8220;continuing to push the race thing.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve stated my belief that the birthers are racists.  I&#8217;ve stated the fact &#8212; acknowledged by anyone who knows anything about the last 40 years of American politics &#8212; that the GOP has exploited race for electoral profit.</p>
<p>In fact it&#8217;s the birthers who are pushing the race thing.  Portions of the GOP &#8212; including the semi-official spokesman, Rush Limbaugh &#8212; are pushing the race thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ExiledIndependent</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522591</link>
		<dc:creator>ExiledIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522591</guid>
		<description>MR, if you&#039;re going to continue to push the race thing, would love take on the presidential exit polls, by race.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MR, if you&#8217;re going to continue to push the race thing, would love take on the presidential exit polls, by race.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522585</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522585</guid>
		<description>Here, Tully, I&#039;l make it easy.  Respondents were asked to consider a list of adjectives to describe blacks.  &quot;Friendly, determined, law-abiding, hard-working, intelligent at school, smart at everyday things&quot; and so on.

Responses are then broken down by &quot;All whites,&quot; &quot;White Democrats,&quot; &quot;White Independents&quot; and &quot;White Republican.&quot;

There are 13 adjectives.  In all 13 Republicans were more negative toward blacks than were democrats.  

13 out of 13.  100% of the time the Republicans took a more negative view of blacks than did Democrats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, Tully, I&#8217;l make it easy.  Respondents were asked to consider a list of adjectives to describe blacks.  &#8220;Friendly, determined, law-abiding, hard-working, intelligent at school, smart at everyday things&#8221; and so on.</p>
<p>Responses are then broken down by &#8220;All whites,&#8221; &#8220;White Democrats,&#8221; &#8220;White Independents&#8221; and &#8220;White Republican.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are 13 adjectives.  In all 13 Republicans were more negative toward blacks than were democrats.  </p>
<p>13 out of 13.  100% of the time the Republicans took a more negative view of blacks than did Democrats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522569</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 02:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522569</guid>
		<description>Tully:

Dude, check your browser.  Did it not open the big giant sidebar window that showed question after question on racial attitudes divided by &quot;white democrats&quot; and &quot;white repubs&quot; and &quot;white independents?&quot;

Don&#039;t call me a liar because your window didn&#039;t open or you didn&#039;t scroll down.  

The rest of your response is empty posturing and straw men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tully:</p>
<p>Dude, check your browser.  Did it not open the big giant sidebar window that showed question after question on racial attitudes divided by &#8220;white democrats&#8221; and &#8220;white repubs&#8221; and &#8220;white independents?&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t call me a liar because your window didn&#8217;t open or you didn&#8217;t scroll down.  </p>
<p>The rest of your response is empty posturing and straw men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmf</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-2/#comment-522515</link>
		<dc:creator>dmf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522515</guid>
		<description>all Rs aren&#039;t racist, sure. some of my &lt;i&gt;best friends &lt;/i&gt;are Rs...  :)

however, on the whole, they sure as hell wheel and deal in it. why do you think st. ronnie kicked off his prez campaign in &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Burning&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;philadelphia, mississippi&lt;/a&gt;?

as a subtle wink to the white racists. don&#039;t take my word for it. &lt;a href=&quot;067400728X&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;take merle and earl black&#039;s&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all Rs aren&#8217;t racist, sure. some of my <i>best friends </i>are Rs&#8230;  :)</p>
<p>however, on the whole, they sure as hell wheel and deal in it. why do you think st. ronnie kicked off his prez campaign in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Burning" >philadelphia, mississippi</a>?</p>
<p>as a subtle wink to the white racists. don&#8217;t take my word for it. <a href="067400728X" >take merle and earl black&#8217;s</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solomon Kleinsmith</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-522510</link>
		<dc:creator>Solomon Kleinsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 01:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522510</guid>
		<description>Well... as I could care less about the conversation above...

The question posed above is why this &#039;story&#039; doesn&#039;t go away.

That&#039;s a simple one. I don&#039;t care if its racism, political beliefs, cultural differences or he just talks funny... people believe what they want to believe, especially when it involves something negative about someone they despise. Remember the falsified documents Dan Rather and company didn&#039;t do due diligence in researching over at CBS? Do you know how many people still believe that recounts showed that Gore won Florida in 2000? Throw in those people who still think that 9/11 was an inside job... oh, and we can&#039;t forget the New World Order folks, and the Bilgeberger Group, or whatever insane stuff they babble on about.

Notice how the vast majority of the people who believe these things are those who already hate the person implicated? Its the way we&#039;re wired... we&#039;re pack/tribe animals. We naturally throw up nearly impossible psychological walls to believing good things about those we view as against our tribe, and see things &#039;between the lines&#039; of people who disagree with us... and find things that we couldn&#039;t possibly actually know, but are sure they are true.

... like Tully claiming my argument for taxing the consumption of certain unhealthy things to pay for health care reforms as being a moral argument. He couldn&#039;t just disagree with me, he had to actually make it personal... because that is what people do when they get riled up... they turn things that MIGHT be true, into things that ARE true, whether they have proof or not.

Its really just a amplified version of why its so hard to change someone&#039;s mind once belief comes into play. Beliefs put a filter on the world. Sometimes that ends up being useful, sometimes it... well... makes you believe crazy things like the president is the Manchurian Candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; as I could care less about the conversation above&#8230;</p>
<p>The question posed above is why this &#8216;story&#8217; doesn&#8217;t go away.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a simple one. I don&#8217;t care if its racism, political beliefs, cultural differences or he just talks funny&#8230; people believe what they want to believe, especially when it involves something negative about someone they despise. Remember the falsified documents Dan Rather and company didn&#8217;t do due diligence in researching over at CBS? Do you know how many people still believe that recounts showed that Gore won Florida in 2000? Throw in those people who still think that 9/11 was an inside job&#8230; oh, and we can&#8217;t forget the New World Order folks, and the Bilgeberger Group, or whatever insane stuff they babble on about.</p>
<p>Notice how the vast majority of the people who believe these things are those who already hate the person implicated? Its the way we&#8217;re wired&#8230; we&#8217;re pack/tribe animals. We naturally throw up nearly impossible psychological walls to believing good things about those we view as against our tribe, and see things &#8216;between the lines&#8217; of people who disagree with us&#8230; and find things that we couldn&#8217;t possibly actually know, but are sure they are true.</p>
<p>&#8230; like Tully claiming my argument for taxing the consumption of certain unhealthy things to pay for health care reforms as being a moral argument. He couldn&#8217;t just disagree with me, he had to actually make it personal&#8230; because that is what people do when they get riled up&#8230; they turn things that MIGHT be true, into things that ARE true, whether they have proof or not.</p>
<p>Its really just a amplified version of why its so hard to change someone&#8217;s mind once belief comes into play. Beliefs put a filter on the world. Sometimes that ends up being useful, sometimes it&#8230; well&#8230; makes you believe crazy things like the president is the Manchurian Candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-522466</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522466</guid>
		<description>If you don&#039;t think they&#039;re racist, you need to work on some critical thinking skills.  You think people would be obsessing over &quot;John Smith&quot;&#039;s BC?  Absolutely not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re racist, you need to work on some critical thinking skills.  You think people would be obsessing over &#8220;John Smith&#8221;&#8216;s BC?  Absolutely not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-522425</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522425</guid>
		<description>Orly Taitz sounds like Arnold Schwarzenegger and acts like Sarah Palin. Oh well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orly Taitz sounds like Arnold Schwarzenegger and acts like Sarah Palin. Oh well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Benjamin</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-522423</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Benjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522423</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Now, if you went through the attitudes of all Democrats towards white people, do you think that you might find something similar going on? Would that not imply anti-white racism? I ask because itâ€™s been a long time since I heard the phrase â€œrich Republicansâ€ used without the word â€œwhiteâ€ in the middle of it. Iâ€™m told thatâ€™s not racism, or that itâ€™s justifiable racism, or even that itâ€™s good racism.&lt;/i&gt;

I sincerely doubt any poll of â€œmost democratsâ€ would demonstrate most of them associated whites with bad things. Most Democrats are white. And the black ones donâ€™t exactly go easy on themselves. 

Rich whites probably. But thatâ€™s not racist so much as classist.

As for the debate on whether more racists are Republican than Dem Iâ€™d have to say yes. 

Thereâ€™s no direct polling data on this issue, but the circumstantial evidence is pretty hard to refute.

1) Most Americans are white, therefore most American Racists are probably white.

2) The Republican party is almost 100% white. The only Black GOP Congressman quit after Bush killed a pork-defense program in his district, and still hasnâ€™t returned to politics. It should be noted that he was theoretically an important person in the House hierarchy, and the Crusader Artillery system was the sole casualty of Bush defense cuts. IMO J. C. Watts got elected, they gave him a fancy title, and then totally ignored him. Kind of like whatâ€™s happening to Steel right now.

3) People who study white racism find itâ€™s strongly correlated with right-wing activism. The Council of Conservative Citizens is explicitly racist, but it frequently manages to dupe non-racist Republicans into supporting it because the rest of itâ€™s platform is right-wing. The John Birchers ainâ€™t leftist, either. The only possibly Democratically aligned racist groups the Southern Poverty Law Center watches are neo-pagan skinheads (probably nonpartisan, or National Socialists), and black separatists. The latter are probably Dems or go for a third-party, but given that blacks only make up 14% of the country itâ€™s unlikely they are a majority of the racists.

Note that the folks who do the most to whitewash the history of racism in this country tend to be GOP. Haley Barbourâ€™s Christmas list includes at least one person who wants to honor Nathan Bedford Forrest with a statue, and his staff actually addressed the card to â€œWizardess.â€

4) Republican states never elect black guys to high office. The two blacks elected to Governorâ€™s seats were elected in Virginia (GOP-leaning), and Massachusetts. MA and IL are the only states to have elected blacks to the US Senate.

This is despite the fact that more than a quarter of the talent pool in LA, MS, and AL is black. Admittedly Louisiana elected a nonwhite to the Governorâ€™s chair recently, but itâ€™s still pretty surprising that IL (15% black), and MA (5% black) both found black guys smart enough for high office before Louisiana (32% black) did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Now, if you went through the attitudes of all Democrats towards white people, do you think that you might find something similar going on? Would that not imply anti-white racism? I ask because itâ€™s been a long time since I heard the phrase â€œrich Republicansâ€ used without the word â€œwhiteâ€ in the middle of it. Iâ€™m told thatâ€™s not racism, or that itâ€™s justifiable racism, or even that itâ€™s good racism.</i></p>
<p>I sincerely doubt any poll of â€œmost democratsâ€ would demonstrate most of them associated whites with bad things. Most Democrats are white. And the black ones donâ€™t exactly go easy on themselves. </p>
<p>Rich whites probably. But thatâ€™s not racist so much as classist.</p>
<p>As for the debate on whether more racists are Republican than Dem Iâ€™d have to say yes. </p>
<p>Thereâ€™s no direct polling data on this issue, but the circumstantial evidence is pretty hard to refute.</p>
<p>1) Most Americans are white, therefore most American Racists are probably white.</p>
<p>2) The Republican party is almost 100% white. The only Black GOP Congressman quit after Bush killed a pork-defense program in his district, and still hasnâ€™t returned to politics. It should be noted that he was theoretically an important person in the House hierarchy, and the Crusader Artillery system was the sole casualty of Bush defense cuts. IMO J. C. Watts got elected, they gave him a fancy title, and then totally ignored him. Kind of like whatâ€™s happening to Steel right now.</p>
<p>3) People who study white racism find itâ€™s strongly correlated with right-wing activism. The Council of Conservative Citizens is explicitly racist, but it frequently manages to dupe non-racist Republicans into supporting it because the rest of itâ€™s platform is right-wing. The John Birchers ainâ€™t leftist, either. The only possibly Democratically aligned racist groups the Southern Poverty Law Center watches are neo-pagan skinheads (probably nonpartisan, or National Socialists), and black separatists. The latter are probably Dems or go for a third-party, but given that blacks only make up 14% of the country itâ€™s unlikely they are a majority of the racists.</p>
<p>Note that the folks who do the most to whitewash the history of racism in this country tend to be GOP. Haley Barbourâ€™s Christmas list includes at least one person who wants to honor Nathan Bedford Forrest with a statue, and his staff actually addressed the card to â€œWizardess.â€</p>
<p>4) Republican states never elect black guys to high office. The two blacks elected to Governorâ€™s seats were elected in Virginia (GOP-leaning), and Massachusetts. MA and IL are the only states to have elected blacks to the US Senate.</p>
<p>This is despite the fact that more than a quarter of the talent pool in LA, MS, and AL is black. Admittedly Louisiana elected a nonwhite to the Governorâ€™s chair recently, but itâ€™s still pretty surprising that IL (15% black), and MA (5% black) both found black guys smart enough for high office before Louisiana (32% black) did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donklephant.com/2009/07/23/jon-stewart-destroys-birthers-movement/comment-page-1/#comment-522271</link>
		<dc:creator>michael reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donklephant.com/?p=15793#comment-522271</guid>
		<description>Exiled:

The birther bill has 9 co-sponsors.  

7 are from the former Confederacy: Texas, Tennessee and Virginia.

1 is from Indiana, a virtual southern state.  That would be famous mental case Dan Burton.  He of the melon-shooting fame.

And 1, God help me, is my own idiot Congressman from Orange County, CA.

Amazingly -- amazingly I say -- none from New England.  Or the midwest.  Or the northeast.  Mostly old white southerners.  From overwhelmingly white districts.  Almost all from &lt;i&gt;rural&lt;/i&gt; white districts.

So I guess white conservatives from all-white rural southern districts are just really, really into documentation.  And it&#039;s just coincidence that their interest was piqued on the occasion of our first black president.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exiled:</p>
<p>The birther bill has 9 co-sponsors.  </p>
<p>7 are from the former Confederacy: Texas, Tennessee and Virginia.</p>
<p>1 is from Indiana, a virtual southern state.  That would be famous mental case Dan Burton.  He of the melon-shooting fame.</p>
<p>And 1, God help me, is my own idiot Congressman from Orange County, CA.</p>
<p>Amazingly &#8212; amazingly I say &#8212; none from New England.  Or the midwest.  Or the northeast.  Mostly old white southerners.  From overwhelmingly white districts.  Almost all from <i>rural</i> white districts.</p>
<p>So I guess white conservatives from all-white rural southern districts are just really, really into documentation.  And it&#8217;s just coincidence that their interest was piqued on the occasion of our first black president.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

