Apologies From The Editor

By Justin Gardner | Related entries in Blogging

Hi all,

Earlier today a post entitled “The Rules Of Zionism” was published on the site by a new contributor. Upon reading it I felt the tone was entirely inappropriate, so I immediately took it down. Also, at mw’s request, I took his one-sided post down too.

So why did this happen?

On Donklephant, my policy with contributors has always been very hands off. Reason being is I’ve set up a platform to welcome a variety of voices to post and I trust that everybody will respect the spirit of the site. Given that, I don’t read posts from contributors before they’re posted. Generally this has worked and I’ve rarely had to take the actions I took this morning.

That doesn’t mean it won’t happen again in the future, but I wanted all of you to know how things work behind the scenes to offer more of an explanation as to why it was posted.

One last note, I took down all of the new contributor’s posts and he won’t be blogging here anymore since his tone obviously doesn’t line up with the spirit of the site.

Please feel free to ask questions in the comments.


This entry was posted on Monday, August 3rd, 2009 and is filed under Blogging. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “Apologies From The Editor”

  1. gerryf Says:

    I saw those posts fairly soon after they went up, and all I could think was, “Oh my, this is not going to turn out well.”

    That kind of stream of conscious, ramble-on take on an issue–especially an issue as contentious as the Middle East tension–rarely reads as intended.

    I am sure that the contributer saw nothing wrong in it and was simply trying to post an alternative view that is not regularly expressed, but it was done in such a ham-handed way it just screamed “danger.”

    And it is a shame, too, because the Middle East conflict is almost always told with a certain bias, when in truth there is plenty of culpability to go around not just among the main players, but among the nations that support the players.

    I think that Obama is actually taking a broader view of the Middle East than his predecessors–and that is a key first step in eventually solving the issues there.

    But I don’t hold out much hope, I am afraid.

    (interesting, my captcha is MOUTH SUBTLY—-the original contributer sure did open his and not use it–that is so weird how some of them have such relevency to the topic)

  2. cy Says:

    I guess I can start reading Donklephant again. Oh, what a long 4 hours it was. :)

  3. michael reynolds Says:

    Gerry:

    I think the one thing neither Jew nor Muslim would appreciate is “ham-handed” treatment.

  4. Terry Says:

    Thanks Justin. I do hope you can find a contributor who takes a more Islamic-leaning position on issues – it’s a voice that needs to be heard.

    What makes Donklephant so special to me is that regardless of what side of an issue the writer falls on, it’s with an open and great respect for opposite viewpoints. I look forward to that continuing here -

  5. Justin Gardner Says:

    Terry,

    I honestly don’t mind somebody who is more sympathetic to the plight of Muslims. Even I have written on this blog that Israelis need to wake up if they want things to change with the Palestinians. But there’s a significant difference between a viewpoint like that and what was posted.

    Sincerely, I wish David the best, but his views just don’t belong on this site.

  6. Jimmy the Dhimmi Says:

    Not only did that contributor represent the views of a significant number of Americans, it was representitive of nearly the entire Islamic world. Why supress it? This blog has an excellent repultation for providing a wide spectra of political views. Nobody will hold it against Donklephant, especially when you saw MW spring up almost instanlty to rebut it.

  7. Jay Says:

    I agree to a point Jimmy, but I feel that posts like that will lead to partisan hackery and thoughtless name-calling that can be easily found on other sites. I appreciate other point of views, but that was simply over the top. Thanks for taking care of it Justin.

    And gerryf, my Captcha is “tor foord”. WTH does that mean? lol.

  8. Justin Gardner Says:

    Jimmy,

    To mw’s point, he didn’t post that because he believed it. He posted it as a reactionary counterpoint to the other post…which is why he was okay with it being taken down.

    Essentially, there are limits and that one went well over the line of the civility we strive to maintain here. You don’t accuse Israel of undertaking ethnic cleansing and call settlers scheming thieves on this blog. It simply isn’t done.

  9. SusanWOB Says:

    Just an FYI: The Hohol posts are still in Donklephant’s RSS feed, feed://feeds.feedburner.com/donklephant/CFBW

Leave a Reply


NOTE TO COMMENTERS:


You must ALWAYS fill in the two word CAPTCHA below to submit a comment. And if this is your first time commenting on Donklephant, it will be held in a moderation queue for approval. Please don't resubmit the same comment a couple times. We'll get around to moderating it soon enough.


Also, sometimes even if you've commented before, it may still get placed in a moderation queue and/or sent to the spam folder. If it's just in moderation queue, it'll be published, but it may be deleted if it lands in the spam folder. My apologies if this happens but there are some keywords that push it into the spam folder.


One last note, we will not tolerate comments that disparage people based on age, sex, handicap, race, color, sexual orientation, national origin or ancestry. We reserve the right to delete these comments and ban the people who make them from ever commenting here again.


Thanks for understanding and have a pleasurable commenting experience.


Related Posts: